Anti-Trust Laws

In: Business and Management

Submitted By tystans
Words 1174
Pages 5

A Competitive America
Tonya Y. Stansberry
DeVry University Abstract
American businesses are based on free trade in a Capitalist system. In its simplest form this means that each business is free to compete with the next. That the entrepreneur is free to risk and open a business whether it is for social gain or profit. Businesses openly compete for the business of the client or customer because they need the income. Businesses have been competing among one another since the industrialization of the United States of America. There have not always rules and regulations to govern fair and equitable trade and business practices. However, with competition came regulation for business and trade. A Competitive America
As Americans we love to compete. Therefore it is no wonder that the United States economy is based on competition. Promoting competition is accepted as the best way to promote consumer well-being. America’s anti-trust laws have been in place for more than 100 years, since the Industrialization of America protecting the consumer’s rights. However, more countries have passed anti-trust laws in the past 20 years. America’s anti-trust laws were passed to focus on anti-competitive practices.
Americans have long loved free market system and the competition that it fosters. Competition among businesses has been regulated by anti-trust acts recently; however they help to maintain a fair and equitable system where the small business is able to compete with the big business. The anti-trust laws enable the consumer to purchase a quality product at an affordable price due to the competitive market that it sets in place between the businesses. Anti-trust laws are needed to continually handle the companies that would be dishonest in business practices if not for regulations and rules.…...

Similar Documents

Anti Trust Laws

...antitrust laws. Antitrust laws enable a free market to thrive and flourish without the fear of monopolization. Monopolization in itself isn’t a bad thing. There are naturally occurring monopolies like public utilities and when a firm is the only producer of a particular good or service. This single firm or company because the scale of economies is so large that they can supply the entire market at a lower cost than any other competing firm could. Monopolies become a problem when a firm or corporation is the only producer selling a particular good or service, this monopoly wills tend to produce fewer products at a high price. This meanwhile is not productive of a free market. The antitrust laws that are in place today came about from the Sherman Act of 1890. This act was created when the public grew resentfully of the trusts that emerged in the 1870’s and 1880’s. The Sherman Act states that “Every contract, combination in the form of a trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among several states, or with foreign nations is declared to be illegal.” This surprising short sentence is the cornerstone for our antitrust laws today. The Sherman Act basically outlawed restraints of trade, meaning anything that would restrain the flow of free trade. This gave a firm foundation for new and current business to enter into the market place; there would be no fear that they would be pushed out of the market either by price-fixing or collusion. These antitrust......

Words: 718 - Pages: 3

Anti-Trust Laws

...Abstract Anti-trust laws were created to stop businesses that are to big from blocking the competition and abusing their power over other businesses. Example 1 Why would the drug maker want to stymie generic competition? Explain. There is one major reason that any pharmaceutical company would attempt to stymie generic competition of any loss of their revenues’. Generic brands of drugs are normally provides the exact same level of benefits just at a much lower cost. The drug makers would defiantly lose millions of dollars by allowing a generic copy of their drug to be sold. The second reason would be the cost of making the drug along with advertising and marketing it as well would cost thousands of dollars. Along with the cost of researching, design, manufacturing, and compliances that goes with the federal regulations. This would mean more money out for the company. They would need to pay for any competition that would hinder any potential success of their product. With all this we also need to consider that the fact of a company’s success would to keep the investors willing to resource their projects, studies and the funding for all those developments. The company wants to make the investors happy so that they wouldn’t lose them, if they don’t maintain a certain level of profitability to keep them happy. Without the investors they would go belly up. What types of legal barriers to market entry exist? When a pharmaceutical has more marketing power they...

Words: 1015 - Pages: 5

Anti Stuffing Laws

...Midterm 10.20.12 Anti-Stuffing and Net Operating Loss Anti-Stuffing is actually something that I have been whiteness to on a few occasions with an old business partner that I had a acquired. Unfortunately the partnership did not succeed, so I am going to share my love for business and what I had found out about Anti-Stuffing, but not limited to Net Operating Loss companies and how this affects them. Before 1986, the history of capital gain tax came back to one court ruling. This case was General Utilities and Operating Company v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935), which resulted in the General Utilities doctrine. Under this doctrine companies could distribute their corporate properties or stock to shareholders without having to pay a capital gains tax at the corporate level. Before this doctrine was repealed courts did not take into account the built in tax liability when determining the value of a company. As a result of this companies were finding ways around these taxes and saving themselves a fair amount of money. In 1986 the Tax Reform Act was passed making it much harder on companies trying to liquidate. It stated that if a company tries to liquidate it must identify its gains or losses at the time of sale, as if it were being sold on the open market. Under this act any such sale will be taxable. This gave us a double-edged sword, as a result of this act. Their two options both would result in losses for the company buying the stock. The first is......

Words: 1507 - Pages: 7

Anti Trust Policy in the Modern Economy: Microsoft Anti-Trust Case

...Anti-trust Policy in the Modern Economy Microsoft's Anti-trust Case Mark Hinman UCCS Baud 5590 Anti-trust Policy in the Modern Economy Microsoft's Anti-trust Case This paper's intention is to discuss the role of anti-trust legislation in the modern economy. To accomplish this, we will be reviewing the United States Government's anti-trust case against Microsoft that began nearly twenty-two years ago. To begin we will look at the history leading up to the filing, the government's argument, Microsoft's argument, and the outcome of the case. We will also look at the intent of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Specifically, how does the Sherman Anti-Trust Act protect consumers? Finally, we will discuss whether the anti-trust legislation actually accomplishes what it is intended to do, with respect to the technology industry. Microsoft has been under constant scrutiny since June 1990 when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched a probe into the possible collusion between Microsoft and IBM. Three years later, the FTC handed over their investigation to the U.S. Department of Justice. After years of accusations for monopolizing and engaging in anti-competitive acts, Microsoft finally, on May 18, 1998, received a suit for violation of federal anti-trust laws.[i] The suit alleges that Microsoft is in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, and seeks to prohibit Microsoft from selling certain products and engaging in certain......

Words: 2315 - Pages: 10

Google Anti Trust Laws

...familiar with antitrust laws and how they play an important factor on successfully running a business. Antitrust laws seek to make businesses compete fairly. They have a serious effect on business practices and the organization of U.S. Industry. Recently in the news many articles have highlighted the topic that Google (The world’s largest Internet search engine) has been violating antitrust laws on how they are handling some ad sales. Just earlier this year (approximately four month ago) the FTC wrapped on an investigation concluding that the search giant had not manipulated its web search results to hurt rivals (US Department of Justice, 2013). Currently in the news Google is being accused of hiding links to rival shopping. This includes travel and other websites to help protect its ad revenues. The companies coming forth explain that Google isn’t practicing ethically and are only looking to benefit their company only. Google has stepped in and is currently trying to convince the European antitrust investigation to wrap up the antitrust probe (US Department of Justice, 2013). Google has offered to change some of their search pages to give more space to rivals in order to satisfy their concerns and just alleviate the whole issue (US Department of Justice, 2013). To my understanding this ordeal falls under the Sherman Act, which was passed by congress July 2, 1890 (Wikipedia, 2013). The Act provides: "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or......

Words: 479 - Pages: 2

Anti-Trust Law and Monopoly; Restraint of Trade

...Anti-Trust Law and Monopoly; Restraint of Trade Anti-trust laws encourage competition by “leveling the playing field”. These laws are intended to prevent large companies who have already established themselves from using their size and leverage to prevent competitors from entering their markets. The Sherman Act addresses unfair strategies in two different ways: Section 1 forbids restraint of trade and Section 2 forbids the misuse of monopoly power. Section 1 requires two or more persons conspiring together for a violation, so the essence of the illegal activity is “the act of joining together”. Section 2 refers to “every person”, so the conduct of a single person can result in a violation of Section 2. Any agreement between firms that results in reduced competition in the marketplace is restraint of trade. When there are very few firms in a market and a firm with an extreme amount of market power can affect the market price of its own product that firm has monopoly power. The Sherman Act applies only to restraints that have a significant impact on interstate commerce; it also extends to U.S. nationals abroad. The Clayton Act deals with specific practices not covered by the Sherman Act that reduce competition or lead to monopoly power. However, they only violate the Act if they are found to substantially lessen competition or create monopoly power. The price discrimination section 2 of the Clayton Act makes it illegal to injure buyers through unfair pricing and......

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Anti Superstition Law

...ANTI SUPERSTITION AND BLACK MAGIC ACT Anti Superstition And Black Magic Act B.A.L.L.B(Hons) Roll No-36 ABSTRACT Superstition is a belief that is not backed by scientific evidence. It is irrational faith in something without a proper explanation. Superstitions are rampant in India and have claimed many lives over the years. The Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Bill 2013 is the first of its kind in India and was passed on 18th December, 2013. The bill was first drafted by social activist and rationalist Narendra Dabholkar in 2003. The bill faced heavy criticism and cost Dabholkar his life. He was shot dead by unknown assailants in August, 2013, nearly 4 months before the bill was passed. The Anti- Superstition Act is the first of its kind in the country and has been dealing with superstition effectively since its implementation last year. Other states such as Karnataka and Assam are also contemplating an Anti -Superstition Bill. This article provides the meaning and causes of superstition. It also discusses the history of the anti- superstition act in Maharashtra, its scope, limitations and subject matter KEYWORDS Superstition, Maharashtra, anti- superstition bill, Narendra Dabholkar, black magic, blind faith, Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti (MANS) ......

Words: 4298 - Pages: 18

Law of Trust

...70 AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE .............. 72 GENERAL PROVISIONS ....................................................... 72 POLICIES ON BORDER CHECKS, ASYLUM ANDIMMIGRATION ............................................. 74 JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CIVIL MATTERS ............... 77 JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ...... 78 POLICE COOPERATION ....................................................... 83 TRANSPORT ........................................................................... 85 COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION ANDAPPROXIMATION OF LAWS ........................................ 87 RULES ON COMPETITION .................................................. 87 RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS ........................... 87 AIDS GRANTED BY STATES ................................................ 90 TAX PROVISIONS .................................................................. 92 APPROXIMATION OF LAWS ................................................ 93 ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY .............................. 96 ECONOMIC POLICY ............................................................. 96 MONETARY POLICY ........................................................... 101 INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS ......................................... 104 PROVISIONS SPECIFIC TO MEMBER STATES WHOSECURRENCY IS THE EURO ................................... 105 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS ........................................... 106 EMPLOYMENT......

Words: 176192 - Pages: 705

Anti Trust and the Consumer

...Anti-Trust Laws and the Consumer Anti-trust laws protect the consumer from unfair and deceptive trade practices. These laws were created to protect business owners, consumers and economic efficiency. In an open and free market, businesses must provide quality products and services to consumers as well as truthful representation of their goods and services. Misrepresentation results in inferior products and artificially inflated prices for the consumer and is at times accomplished through unlawful collusion between competitors. A fair and open market where businesses compete in a non-monopolistic environment brings economic efficiency as businesses are encouraged to find more efficient methods of production stay in the market. Inefficient firms that fail to understand consumer needs, eventually lose in the market. If open market competition was nonexistent, cartels and monopolies would be free to distort the allocation of society’s resources for economic profit in the long run. This would result in economic loss to consumers as well as competitive harm to the economy. In the United States, the basic federal antitrust laws are: The Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act (1914) and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. The Sherman Act prohibits the restraint of trade and the creation of monopolies and is an important part of economic legislation in the United States. The Sherman Act prohibits any agreement among competitors to fix prices, rig bids or engage in......

Words: 3108 - Pages: 13

Anti Corruption Law

...Company Law Cons Even though the Hong Kong Bribery Law acts effectively in anti-corruption compared to the mainland bribery law, there are still some loopholes, especially when compared to the UK Bribery Act and the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Similar to the effectives of the Bribery Law, the defects of the HK bribery law also covers equality, enforceability, recourse efficiency and law as a reflection of community standards and expectation four aspects, and each will be discussed with relevant cases. 1. Equality 2.1 Foreign bribes With the prevalence of overseas corruption, most of the countries have set specific regulation against foreign bribes. For example, both the UK Bribery Act and the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) make it an offence to bribe foreign officials. Under the Bribery Act a “foreign public official “ is defined more narrowly than under the FCPA but sill includes (1) anyone who holds a foreign legislative or judicial position; (2) individuals who exercise a public function for a foreign country, territory, public agency or public enterprise o; or (3) any official or agent of a public organization. On the other hand, the Hong Kong Bribery Law does not specifically cover the foreign bribes, which results in the controversial judgment on the case HKSAR v. Krieger . In this case, the defendants, the officers of a Hong Kong subsidiary of the Swire Group of Companies were accused of conspiring with a Macau businessman to......

Words: 1641 - Pages: 7

Anti-Trust Claims

...Antitrust Claims Antitrust represents an uneasy compromise between laissez faire and interventionist visions of public policy. It recognizes the need for governmental involvement in the economy beyond the protection of property rights; yet it rejects overt control of market outcomes. The appropriate degree of governmental involvement for antitrust policy remains a contentious issue. Laissez faire and interventionist economic theories have competed for influence in antitrust decision making ever since the enactment of the Sherman Act of 1890. Antitrust laws were adopted by Congress to outlaw or restrict business practices considered to be monopolizing or which restrain interstate commerce. The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 declared every contract, combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce between states of foreign countries to be illegal. Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, was amended by the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, prohibits discrimination among customers through pricing and disallows mergers, acquisitions or takeovers of one firm by another if the effect will substantially lessen competition. The Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice enforces for the federal government, but private lawsuits to halt antitrust activities have become popular, particularly since attorneys fees are awarded to the winning party. This act is seen to be a legal specialty that has kept a few industries honest. The world’s largest media company and......

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Anti-Divorce Law in the Philippines to be expected that the country will continuously have a robust during 2015. CRBE Philippines also doesn't see any sign of slowdown in the real estate business until 2016 mainly because a lot of companies are expanding. Despite of the increases in rental rates across all business districts, good news still remains that investors are willing to pay for the quality and value that they can get in the Philippines. Since Real Estate business is one of the most emerging industries in the country, many firms compete in this field. The top three real estate companies in the Philippines are Ayala Land, Inc., SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and Megaworld Corporation. C, R Megaworld Corporation was founded by Andrew Tan and incorporated under Philippine law on August 24, 1989. It is a subsidiary of Alliance Global Group, Inc. and it has a market capitalization of 134.8 billion pesos. It has a ticker symbol of MEG in the Philippine Stock Exchange. Megaworld Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, develops, markets, and leases real estate properties in the Philippines. The company’s real estate portfolio comprises residential condominium units, subdivision lots, and townhouses. It also leases office and retail spaces; manages hotel operations; and provides project design, construction, and property management services, as well as engages in cinema, business process outsourcing, educational, facilities provider, and maintenance activities. The company initially established a reputation......

Words: 779 - Pages: 4

Anti-Trust Laws

...Antitrust Laws & Their Effects Jamar Averyhart Dr. Law Trine University In order to have a free economy you must have a competitive market place. A market that is open and stimulates the economy. This gives consumers whether they are organizations or just regular citizens the opportunity to purchase consumer goods at a relatively low price. As opposed to other economies that are not open markets, and that have one firm dominating the market place. Which drives up the price of consumer goods and make them unreasonably high. This is where antitrust laws come into play ("The Antitrust Laws," 2015). What are antitrust laws? Antitrust laws keep organizations from creating monopolies in industries, or colluding to drive up the price of items. If two major firms i.e. Apple and Microsoft were to merge. They control a large majority of the marketplace in the computer industry. This merger would lead to a shift in the price of computer and computer technology. It would create unequal competition and drive many other firms out of business. With the resources and consumer base that both companies have they would be able to dictate the prices in the industry and not have to rely on consumer demand and market trends. The first ever antitrust law was passed in 1890 which was the Sherman Act ("The Antitrust Laws," 2015). The Sherman Act made it illegal to try to form a monopoly, have a monopoly, or plan to have one. ("The Antitrust Laws," 2015) With the Sherman Act violating......

Words: 2079 - Pages: 9

Anti Trust Laws

...collects the most money. In business, this is illegal and antitrust laws are what mandates and controls corporate America’s ability to create monopolies. This attempts to keep a fair playing field among competitors in similar businesses (Ftc Guide To Antitrust Laws, 2008). With the current health care debate issues concerning anti trust laws are also an issue for concern. A major facet of President Obama’s health care reform is for those within the health care community from providers to drug companies to commit on some level to keeping down cost. According to the New York Times, “Any agreement among competitors with regard to prices or price increases — even if they set a maximum — would raise legal concerns” (Pear, 2006) Anti-trust laws are imperative to keep the market competitive regardless of the type of business one runs. However, especially in terms of medical care it is important that issues, such as price gouging do not take place because of the large number of people who struggle with health care cost. Unfair business practices are always a point within business constantly under monitoring and creating changes because of said monitoring. Health care is essential to the everyday lives of the American people, from those who can afford to pay cash for their medical services to those who use public assistance, and everyone in between. If any area of business needs to stay abreast of issues concerning anti trust laws and monopoly health care is number one because of......

Words: 1043 - Pages: 5

Anti Trust Claims

...Antitrust Claims Antitrust laws were put in place to preserve competition as the rule of trade. Microsoft was accused of violating antitrust laws, and engaging in anti-competitive behavior by illegally using its Windows operating system monopoly. Netscape contended that Microsoft’s anticompetitive practices caused anti-trust injury by violating the Sherman Act. The Sherman Act The Sherman ACT of 1890 prohibits every contract, combination, or conspiracy that restrains trade, or any attempted or actual monopolization or conspiracy or combination to monopolize. While the Sherman Act does not ban all forms of trade, it does stop those that are considered unreasonable. Fixing prices, rigging bids, and dividing markets are all considered violations of the Sherman Act (Anonymous, 2012). It is not illegal for a company to have a monopoly in their industry. However, if the organization attempts to hold their monopoly status through ventures that exclude other companies from having a hold in the market, then the Sherman Act comes into play. Microsoft As most of the world is aware, Microsoft is a monopoly. AOL Time Warner accused Microsoft of engaging in illegal practices to maintain this monopoly (Well & McMillan, 2003). The alleged anticompetitive practices pertained to their Windows operating system. The suit claimed Microsoft held its position as a monopoly in the personal computer operating trade by unlawful exclusionary conduct (Ohlhausen, 2008). In layman’s......

Words: 495 - Pages: 2