Are Software Patents Evil?

In: Computers and Technology

Submitted By salam
Words 4445
Pages 18
A few weeks ago I found to my surprise that I'd been granted four patents. This was all the more surprising because I'd only applied for three. The patents aren't mine, of course. They were assigned to Viaweb, and became Yahoo's when they bought us. But the news set me thinking about the question of software patents generally.

Patents are a hard problem. I've had to advise most of the startups we've funded about them, and despite years of experience I'm still not always sure I'm giving the right advice.

One thing I do feel pretty certain of is that if you're against software patents, you're against patents in general. Gradually our machines consist more and more of software. Things that used to be done with levers and cams and gears are now done with loops and trees and closures. There's nothing special about physical embodiments of control systems that should make them patentable, and the software equivalent not.

Unfortunately, patent law is inconsistent on this point. Patent law in most countries says that algorithms aren't patentable. This rule is left over from a time when "algorithm" meant something like the Sieve of Eratosthenes. In 1800, people could not see as readily as we can that a great many patents on mechanical objects were really patents on the algorithms they embodied.

Patent lawyers still have to pretend that's what they're doing when they patent algorithms. You must not use the word "algorithm" in the title of a patent application, just as you must not use the word "essays" in the title of a book. If you want to patent an algorithm, you have to frame it as a computer system executing that algorithm. Then it's mechanical; phew. The default euphemism for algorithm is "system and method." Try a patent search for that phrase and see how many results you get.

Since software patents are no different from hardware patents, people who say…...

Similar Documents

Patent

...INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY(IP)-This refers to the creations of mind: invetions, literary and artistic works and symbols, names, images and designs used in commerce and trade. IP is divided into two categories- 1-Industrial Property-which includes inventions (Patents, Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications of source) 2-Copyright-which includes literary and artistic works such as novels, poems and plays, films, musical works, artistic works such as drawings, paintings, photographs and sculptures and architectural designs. WHAT ARE IPR’s? Intellectual Property Rights are the rights given to people over the creations of their minds. With rights in hand, through the exploitation of IP, the individuals or the business organizations earn profits either through manufacturing or licensing and which is a reward for their innovative efforts. It also acts as a stimulus to R&D efforts. NEED FOR IPR’S: Michael Porter in his work on “Competitive Advantage” stated that differentiation is a key to business competitiveness. This can achieved through product, experience, technology or way the things are performed and exhibited to satisfy the customers. However, all this amounts to the knowledge which, in today’s highly dynamic and competitive business environment is the key source of competitive strength to the organizations. The need of IPR can be felt because any invention is the intellectual catpital of a firm or an individual which needs to be captured,......

Words: 2571 - Pages: 11

Evil

...The Problem of Evil William Lane Craig Examines both the logical and probabilistic arguments against God from suffering and evil. The problem of evil is certainly the greatest obstacle to belief in the existence of God. When I ponder both the extent and depth of suffering in the world, whether due to man’s inhumanity to man or to natural disasters, then I must confess that I find it hard to believe that God exists. No doubt many of you have felt the same way. Perhaps we should all become atheists. But that’s a pretty big step to take. How can we be sure that God does not exist? Perhaps there’s a reason why God permits all the evil in the world. Perhaps it somehow all fits into the grand scheme of things, which we can only dimly discern, if at all. How do we know? As a Christian theist, I’m persuaded that the problem of evil, terrible as it is, does not in the end constitute a disproof of the existence of God. On the contrary, in fact, I think that Christian theism is man’s last best hope of solving the problem of evil. In order to explain why I feel this way, it will be helpful to draw some distinctions to keep our thinking clear. First, we must distinguish between the intellectual problem of evil and the emotional problem of evil. The intellectual problem of evil concerns how to give a rational explanation of how God and evil can co-exist. The emotional problem of evil concerns how to dissolve people’s emotional dislike of a God who would permit......

Words: 3493 - Pages: 14

Copyright and Patents

...Studies……………………………………………………............................................48 CASE I, Software Pirates in India Beware.............................................................50 CASE II, Rowling’s brush with India, 2007............................................................51 CASE III, Yahoo Sued by Indian Music Company, 2008…………….……….....54 Questionnaire for Survey ……………………………………………………………..…...56 Analysis of Survey…………………………………………………………………….….....58 Conclusion………………………………...............................................................................60 Bibliography............................................................................................................................61 The Copyright Act Introduction: Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights:   Intellectual property (IP) rights are the rights awarded by society to individuals or organizations principally over creative works: inventions, literary and artistic works, and symbols, names, images, and designs used in commerce. They give the creator the right to prevent others from making unauthorized use of their property for a limited period. IP is categorized as Industrial Property (functional commercial innovations), and Artistic and Literary Property (cultural creations). Current technological developments are blurring, to some extent, this distinction, and some hybrid sui generis systems are emerging.   Industrial Property:   Patents: A patent is an exclusive right awarded......

Words: 16139 - Pages: 65

Software Copyrights and Patents

...Software Copyright and Patents Introduction The escalating speed of the advancement in the software industry has put many parties in a competitive race to come up with new softwares for commercial purposes. This digital arms race contributed to a rapid increase in software patents from a mere 45 average patents a week in year 1985 to an average 1200 patents a week in year 2012 (Patent Metrics, 2013). Intrigued by such large numbers of software patents, multiple studies have been carried out by scholars to investigate the impact of software patents to the software industry. The studies sparked an ongoing debate on whether software copyrights and patents are beneficial or detrimental for the software industry. This paper touches lightly on the methodology of software copyrights and patents under the current standards of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It then explores the benefits of copyrights and patents in the software industry and lay out the drawbacks of software patenting. Finally, this paper provides a possible four-point solution to the problems concerning software patents. Methodology of Software Copyrights and Patents According to WIPO, copyright is defined as something that “provides exclusive legal rights to a creator to publish, print, perform or materialise an original work and authorize others to do the same” (2002). In the context of software copyright, a software is subject to copyright as soon as it is documented in a verifiable......

Words: 3386 - Pages: 14

Evil Twin

...Evil Twin Wi-Fi Attacks NT1110: Computer Structure and Logic October 23, 2013 Abstract What is the “Evil Twin”? Evil Twin is a type of Wi-Fi attack, it is a home-made wireless access point that masquerades as a legitimate hot spot with a very strong signal in efforts to gather personal or corporate information. With this, the overall goal of this report is to educate the public on how to protect themselves. Additionally in this disadvantages and advantages will be discussed along with the effects on consumers and the future. According to Dr. Phil Nobles, a wireless Internet and cybercrime expert at Cranfield University, said: this is how the evil twin works. "So-called 'evil twin' hotspots present a hidden danger for Web users. In essence, users think they've logged on to a wireless hotspot connection when in fact they've been tricked to connect to the attacker's unauthorized base station. The latter jams the connection to a legitimate base station by sending a stronger signal within close proximity to the wireless client -- thereby turning itself into an 'evil twin. Cybercriminals don't have to be that clever to carry out such an attack. Because wireless networks are based on radio signals they can be easily detected by unauthorized users tuning into the same frequency." The Disadvantage of Evil Twins The Evil Twins a Menace to Wireless Security > Mobile, (by Jack M German Tech News World 06/04/09). Once the......

Words: 1288 - Pages: 6

Impairment of a Patent

...Every so often, the value of an asset can suddenly decline. An example of this would be losing a patent lawsuit. “In such cases the asset is said to be impaired and the accounting treatment depends on the type of asset and the accounting standards in use” (Financial Education, 2007). Patents are intangible asset that “gives their owners exclusive rights to use or manufature of a particular product” (Walther, 2010, ch. 11). The patent cost is “amortized over its useful life which should not exceed its legal life of 20 years” (Walther, 2010, ch.11). The impairment of a patent denotes that the owner of the asset (patent) “no longer expects to be able to generate returns of cash from the asset sufficient to recapture its recorded net book value” (Walther, 2010, ch. 11). FASB 30-35-11, states that as a result of an impairment loss, the loss should be “presented in the income statement in the same manner as other impairment losses” (FASB, 30-35-11). An impairment loss is recorded on the income statement and the intangible asset is reduced on the books of the company. FASB 30-35-14 goes on to explain that an impairment loss should be “recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value” (FASB, 30-35-14). Once this loss is recognized, “the adjusted carrying amount of the intangible asset should be its new accounting basis” (FASB, 30-35-19). References (2007). Financial Education. Retrieved February 6, 2011......

Words: 303 - Pages: 2

Death of Patent

...the downloading of the existing designs and print guns on their own. So long as was has the knowledge of printing and assembling through 3D you are good to go, however there have been claims that the technology is not that easy because as much as it is easy to print the gun you cannot do the same with the ammunition that will be used in the gun. 3D guns are a big threat both to security and the implementation of patent rights. The security will be affected much in countries where acquiring a gun is not easy like England, hence people will take the advantage to print their own guns to use them however they please. The congress man Rep Steve Israel is against the printing of the 3D plastic guns and of the view that they should be banned because they cannot be detected by easily as other metal detectors posing a huge security risk. This is not easy because banning the guns will not help much as long as the 3D printers are still in existence. Many analysts claim that this will only interfere with the business of 3D printers which are lawfully in existence and also have patent, trademark and copyright protection rights. Apart form being unlawful, it lacks vision and cannot be argued in a court of law, hence need to amend the intellectual property laws to fit in the advancing technology being witnessed in 3D printing and scanning that can easily be accessed by virtually everybody ( Hart & Clark. 2014). Technology is advancing everyday and very soon the 3D technology will be in a......

Words: 5711 - Pages: 23

Patents

...11 February 2015 Intellectual property: Case study PATENTS First, I would make my own research about if there are already existing products that may be similar to my invention. If I would be very sure of the novelty of the product, I would go to the National patent office in Latvia, fill in the legal documents and register for the patent grant. However, already at this point I would meet the first risk – the procedure what to demand from the lawyers. Knowing the specific matters about the Patent office of Latvia, I would consult about what should be done to gain the maximum information and protection from registering the patent. Due the fact that prior arts are a global matter, the issue should be demanded to be researched prom the lawyer’s side so that in future less problems can arise. It is important to remember that the application form would clearly form the problem that has been solved, public’s interest in finding a solution of this problem and the novelty of the solution itself. Also point out that the product will be used in any kind of industries (for example, security service/ life guards in mountains etc.). It is very important to educate the reader about the matter of the patent due the fact that misinterpretation could lead to the failure of the registration, for example, if the application focuses on the design approach of the scarf rather than the unusual manner or procedure etc., it may accrue that application is rejected as being identified as an......

Words: 403 - Pages: 2

Disadvantages of Software Patents

...Disadvantages of software Patents 1. Furthering Monopoly Software patents let companies such as Oracle buy up patents on technology created by others and then launch lawsuit after lawsuit as a way to generate revenue. This is what it means to be a "patent troll," and it's of course motivated by the huge sums that have been awarded by the courts in the past. It also puts the advantage squarely in the hands of the industry's monoliths, which are the ones with deep enough pockets to acquire and assert all that intellectual property. 2. Hindering Innovation By their very definition, patents reduce the sharing of new ideas. In the software industry--which relies on just that kind of diffusion to spur further innovation--that's particularly destructive. Software patents frequently have very broad or vague boundaries, making it highly unclear where the patented piece of a program begins and ends. Frequently, software patents cover what can be considered the equivalent of a sequence of notes in a piece of music; imagine if that were to happen in the music world! It has also been historically very difficult for patent offices to judge patent quality, or to realize when a patent application is too broad or covers something trivial. 3. Cost and Time Patents are extremely expensive, and the examination process takes a very long time. Not only are the costs extremely high to determine if a particular piece of software infringes any issued patents--thereby reducing the funds......

Words: 1547 - Pages: 7

Patent Trolls

...Patent Trolls Patent Trolls as defined by Investopedia is a term used to describe companies or people that misuse patents as a business strategy. These patents are bought by Non-Practicing Entity’s (NPE) who buy these patents from bankrupt companies and auctions and have no intentions of developing it. Their business strategy is to do some research and file lawsuits against infringing companies. These Patent trollers cost the US Company billions of dollars each year. They disrupt the productivities of many companies and affect the whole idea of creativity and innovation in the United States. Patent trolling cost the companies $29 Billion in 2011 in direct costs and up to $80 Billion in other ancillary costs. Add to that the incalculable costs in terms of productivity and disruption of innovation and entrepreneurship. Among the ones that are most affected by this are the small and start-up companies. To give a comparison, the terrorist attack of 9/11 had an economic impact of $123 Billion whereas, patent troll lawsuits amounted to $500 Billion in lost wealth to defendants. The next question that needs to be answered is why there is a rise in this sort of unethical business. This business has a very low start-up cost which usually requires buying out junk patents or acquiring patents from bankrupt companies. This business also has a very low overhead cost Furthermore, the cost of running these sort of businesses are......

Words: 631 - Pages: 3

Zen Patent

...SHI SUBJECT: THE BEST WAY TO LEVERAGE THE ZEN PATENT ------------------------------------------------- DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 2016 This is to propose that Creative should exit the hardware business and MP3 market and take immediate seek settlement from Apple. This is the best way to protect Creative’s business and innovations as they would be able to avoid an endless and costly legal battle with Apple and leverage the Zen patent effectively. There are several potential tactical options that Creative has toward the patent infringement issue against Apple. To begin with, an option would be to give up their patent and try to compete with Apple. Considering the growth that Apple has and their leading market position, this is probably the worst option for Creative. Plus, the superior user experience that the Zen patent brings in this fast growing MP3 market will undoubtedly drive spectacular revenue for Creative and thus there is no reason for Creative to give up the patent. Secondly Creative could sue to seek an injunction from allowing Apple to make their product. It is a really good option when people want to get rid of a potential competitor for a long time. In this case, Apple would not be able to manufacture its iPod when Creative litigate their claims. But would Apple give up on this attractive MP3 market just because of this? The answer is no without doubt. What they would do is to redesign their software, improve their iTunes whatever they need to......

Words: 720 - Pages: 3

Malware: Evil Software

...Malware: Evil Software Malicious software, or Malware for short, is designed to access computer systems secretly without the owner’s knowledge or consent. Malware is a general term used by professionals in the computer industry to describe a variety of hostile, invasive, or aggravating software programs. Software is considered to be malware based on the suspected intentions of the designer rather than any particular features the software may or may not have. Malware, also known as computer containment, has grown to include computer viruses, worms, Trojan horses, spyware, dishonest adware, crimeware, and other malicious and unwanted software programs. Symantec published in 2008 that “the release rate of malicious codes and other unwanted programs may be exceeding that of legitimate software applications”. According to F-Secure, “As much malware was produced during 2007 as in the previous 20 years altogether.” Malware has become the most common pathway on the Internet for criminals to access users: especially through e-mail and the World Wide Web. The frequency of malware use for organized Internet crime, along with the inability of anti-malware protection products to protect against the incessant stream of newly produced malware, has encouraged a new mind-frame for business owners who operate on the Internet. Business owners acknowledge that a large percent of Internet customers will always be infected for one reason or another, and they need to continue doing......

Words: 1653 - Pages: 7

Software Patents

...Software Patents Controversy over software patents has been around since the inception of commercial software. The main issue lies in the fact that some software producers want legislation that allows them to be granted exclusive rights to algorithms, data structures or other snippets of code implemented in their commercial productions, while other people argue that software patents stint software production and have many other negative effects. Due to the increasing size of the software industry, and in turn the rising number of software patents being applied for and granted, the number of problems arising from this issue is only getting worse; clearly our patent system is broken. Both advocates and opponents of software patents make convincing arguments, but because of my own personal experiences and opinions, as well as the opinions of other patent objectors, I believe patents like Amazon's US5960411 online ordering system patent should not be granted. People that oppose software patents are at an advantage in that there are many examples that make a compelling argument for them. It is no subtle fact that claims are made that software patents impede research and development of software. These claims can be quantified in studies like those in Adam Jaffe's Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress. In these studies, Jaffe shows that many companies are stopped from working on projects because they find......

Words: 1699 - Pages: 7

The Patent Pledge

...realized recently that we may be able to solve part of the patent problem without waiting for the government. I've never been 100% sure whether patents help or hinder technological progress. When I was a kid I thought they helped. I thought they protected inventors from having their ideas stolen by big companies. Maybe that was truer in the past, when more things were physical. But regardless of whether patents are in general a good thing, there do seem to be bad ways of using them. And since bad uses of patents seem to be increasing, there is an increasing call for patent reform. The problem with patent reform is that it has to go through the government. That tends to be slow. But recently I realized we can also attack the problem downstream. As well as pinching off the stream of patents at the point where they're issued, we may in some cases be able to pinch it off at the point where they're used. One way of using patents that clearly does not encourage innovation is when established companies with bad products use patents to suppress small competitors with good products. This is the type of abuse we may be able to decrease without having to go through the government. The way to do it is to get the companies that are above pulling this sort of trick to pledge publicly not to. Then the ones that won't make such a pledge will be very conspicuous. Potential employees won't want to work for them. And investors, too, will be able to see that they're the sort of......

Words: 593 - Pages: 3

Viagra Patent

...has applied for FDA approval to market Revatio for use in children; an FDA decision is expected in May. Federal law provides for such extensions of exclusivity as an incentive for drug makers to test products that may be helpful to children. During exclusivity periods, competing generic copies are generally prohibited from entering the market. The FDA granted the six-month pediatric extension for sildenafil on Feb. 9, according to the FDA website. The patent extension applies to any drug containing sildenafil, even Viagra, which is only approved for use by men with erectile dysfunction and not for use by children. As a result, the U.S. period of exclusivity for Viagra would extend by six months until April 2020, said Pfizer spokeswoman Victoria Davis. That is based on a patent due to expire in 2019, which covers sildenafil's use to treat ED. This patent was upheld by a federal judge last year, though Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (TEVA), which challenged the patent's validity, has appealed that decision. The basic patent for sildenafil was due to expire in March 2012. The pediatric exclusivity period now extends to September....

Words: 254 - Pages: 2