Ceo Compensation

In: Business and Management

Submitted By najaf3
Words 735
Pages 3
CEO Compensation
Thoughts on the current state of executive compensation practices in the US:
Current state of Executive compensation within the US differs from different compensation practices within the forms it takes, laws and regulation it's subject to, its dramatic rise over the past 3 decades and wide go criticism leveled against it. Within the past 3 decades in America government compensation or pay has up dramatically on the far side what is often explained by changes in firm size, performance, and trade classification. It’s the very best within the world in each absolute term and relative to median earnings within the America. It has been criticized not solely as excessive, however conjointly for "rewarding failure" as well as large drops available value. Observers dissent on what proportion of the increase in and nature of this compensation may be a natural result of competition for scarce business talent benefiting investor price, and the way abundant is that the work of manipulation and self-dealing by management unrelated to produce, demand, or reward for performance.
While our government compensation attorneys perceive the elaborate, technical aspects of government compensation legal problems and governing laws, they tend to conjointly perceive market practices and trends. They tend to facilitate our purchasers establish and perceive the key legal risks in a very industrial context so they will build familiar business selections. They tend to closely monitor key legal developments and proactively reach bent our purchasers to stay them up to hurry on latest developments. Their team works along, sharing concepts and experiences, so they are able to deliver to their purchaser’s inventive concepts and sensible solutions to their government compensation legal challenges.
Most of the personal sector economy within the U. S. is formed by such corporations…...

Similar Documents

Case Analysis About Ceo Compensation

...CEO Compensation The most visible and highly paid person in most corporations is the chief executive officer (CEO).  CEO compensation is particularly important to firms for three reasons.  First, the compensation package is likely to be important in attracting and retaining good CEOs.  Second, the form of the pay contract is likely to help determine whether the CEO focuses on value maximization or some other objective.  Third, employees throughout the organization carefully follow their CEO’s pay.  Important morale problems can occur when employees think that the CEO is overpaid.  For instance, employees complain bitterly when they are asked to take pay cuts because the company is in trouble, yet at the same time the CEO gets a big raise.             Controversy over CEO pay has increased substantially in recent years.  One charge is that the level of CEO pay is too high.  CEO pay is so huge that people don’t believe they deserve it.  It is easy to pint to many ECOS who report compensation in the millions of dollars (reported compensation figures typically include salary and bonus payments, as well as gains from the exercise of stock options).  Consider the following two examples.  Investors were outraged when E Trade Group Inc. disclosed it had paid out a $77 million compensation package for CEO Christos M. Cotsakos in 2001- a year in which the financial-services company lost $242 million.  When Cotsakos pledged later to return $21 million, the complaints hardly......

Words: 512 - Pages: 3

Ceo Compensation

...who is required to remain on call at home, or who is allowed to leave a message where he/she can be reached, is not working (in most cases) while on call. Additional constraints on the employee's freedom could require this time to be compensated. This would have to be proven as occurred by law (Wage and Hour Division, 2008). Analysis: Skidmore was required by his employer, Swift Co., to be “on call.” The “on call” situation allowed him to be anywhere he wished to be. When called, however, he had to be there within an hour. This was called “waiting time.” Overall, during most weeks, his actual hours exceeded the 40 hour workweek. Skidmore requested overtime pay, but was not paid. Swift argued that Skidmore was not entitled to such compensation. Whether “waiting time” is “working time” depends on the particular case and is a question of facts to be resolved by the trial court. The FLSA requires the payment of time and one-half of an employee’s regular rate of pay for each hour worked in excess of 40 hours in any workweek (Module 5, 2013). Being that Skidmore was allowed to be anywhere he wished to be while on-call, not being given the overtime pay was not unfair to him. He was just on-call by his employer but was not required to remain on call at his place of residence. He was able to go anywhere he pleased, as long as he could be reached if something within the company actually took place. The work arrangement should be revisited and provisions should be made to assist......

Words: 977 - Pages: 4

Compensation

...HRM598: Compensation Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………3 Phase I ………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Phase II …………………………………………………………………………………………7 Phase III ……………………………………………………………………………………….24 Phase IV ……………………………………………………………………………………….52 References ……………………………………………………………………………………..56 Team Project: Designing a Compensation Plan for Eco Pillow Inc. Executive Summary Eco Pillow Inc. located in New Rochelle, New York manufactures recycled and recyclable plastic pillows for the healthcare industry with a strong commitment to provide quality eco-friendly products that are not only safe for consumers but the environment as well. Eco Pillow is a company that produces and distributes these products to a primary client base of hospitals in a local New York metro demographic in order to form long-lasting relationships with their cliental. Through innovation and product development the company can offer the healthcare community a specialty designed product and meet the demands for a safe and environmentally friendly product that is well-known current and future goals of the healthcare industry. Eco Pillow Inc. provides this compensation plan to formulate the cost associated with the employee base and essentially the human resources plan for staffing and maintaining the company, aimed at fulfilling each of the positions needed for business achievement. This plan will provide a......

Words: 6918 - Pages: 28

Ceo Pay, Compensation Websites and Managerial Implications of Compensation

...Compensation Final: Three Essays Mr. Music MGT 320 April 27, 2011 1) Essay Question # 2: Issues of CEO pay that managers need to understand. CEO Pay Overview It seems as though no matter how bad the economy gets or how poorly a company performs, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) (and other top executives) always come out in the best possible position, especially with compensation. Besides lavish compensation packages and best possible amenities, the CEO’s generally enjoy large severance packages or “golden parachutes”. Severance packages are basically contractual deals between the CEO and the corporation that in case the CEO is terminated for some reason or leaves the company, he/she is entitled to a specific sum of money on departure. Golden parachute is a term used to describe rich severance pay packages which in addition offer cash bonuses, stock options and benefits – essentially a complete and wealthy severance pay package. (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2009) The purpose of these packages was logical for industries prone to mergers, acquisitions or failure – it would protect the CEO in case the company experiences any of the above. Nevertheless it increased the moral hazard problem and the principal-agent problem within organizations. Basically the rationale has a fallacy where it protects the CEO and his/her pay if the company should fail, merge or be acquired but it doesn’t protect the company if the CEO performs badly and decides to bail out when the company is......

Words: 4626 - Pages: 19

Ceo Compensation in the Pharmaceutical Industry

...implemented, particularly for executives. In this paper, we are going to discuss the incentives of four different CEO from Pharmaceutical Industry. Pfizer Merck & Co Bristol-Myers Squibb Vertex 2012 Revenue $59B $47B $21B $1.5B 2011 Revenue $65B $48B $19B $1.0B CEO Read Frazier Andreotti Leiden Base $1.75M $1.5M $1.6M $1.0M Annual Incentive $3.4M $2.5M $3.8M $2.1M Annual LT Incentive (Stock and Stock Options) $12.9M $7.1M $10.9M $2.5M Perks/Other $175k $0.06M $808k $0.01M Vested/Exercised Shares $5.6M Approx. Total $25M $11.1M $17.2M $5.7M According to the Proxy statements, both Pfizer and Mereck have approximately 90% of their compensation as variable, based on company performance. The large discontinuity between the two companies is mostly due to the vested or exercised shares of Pfizer’s Ian Read. Excluding this amount, the companies’ compensation plans are generally aligned with their comparable sizes and company performance. Pfizer offered the largest incentive-based payout to it’s CEO in 2012, justified by the company exceeding two of three performance metrics despite key patent losses and the leadership Read showed throughout the year. Merck ranked their CEO performance as high in a tough environment, but due to a low internal scorecard results and shareholder return rankings Frazier was awarded a lower amount of variable compensation than in 2011. Overall, both of these industry leaders seem to have incentive programs aligned with company and......

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Ceo Compensation Study

...请查阅国内外相关文献,对高管薪酬影响因素方面的文献做简要评述(500-1000 字) 。 评述的主要内容包括: 文献中主要从哪些角度研究了高管薪酬问题?(2) 影响高管薪 (1) 酬的主要因素有哪些?(3) 现有文献中有关高管薪酬决定因素的研究中,已经比较一致 的观点有哪些?尚存争议的观点有哪些? 2. 统计分析各个一级行业(SIC)在各个年度上的平均 CEO_compen,并作简要分析; 3. 在每个年度上,分别根据营业收入 (Sale)、负债率、ROA 和 Salegr 将样本分成两组: High 和 Low 组。 统计基于不同指标分组后两组公司的 CEO_compen 的平均值; 计 (1) (2) 算两组均值差异,并采用 t-test 检验均值差异是否显著。 (提示:t-test 可以使用 ttest 命 令,亦可使用外部命令 ttable2 或 ttestplus 等) 。表格形式如下: 分组指标 Sale Leverage ROA Salegr High Mean1 Mean1 Mean1 Mean1 Low Mean2 Mean2 Mean2 Mean2 difference Mean1-Mean2 Mean1-Mean2 Mean1-Mean2 Mean1-Mean2 t-value*** 4. 设定线性回归模型, 被解释变量为 CEO_compen (在第二次作业中已经定义了这个变量)。 (1) 解释变量可以根据你查阅的文献自行设定,说明你选择的变量反映了哪些方面的影 响(如经营业绩、资本结构、资产结构、行业特征、年度特征、公司治理、经理人个人 特征等)?(2) 对于选入的每个解释变量都要给出变量的定义、计算方法以及所参考的 主要文献。(3) 样本的筛选过程和离群值的处理方法需要详细说明。 提示:建议设定如下模型形式: CEO _ compenit  a  1 X it  s  t   it (1) 其中,CEO_compenit 表示公司 i 在第 t 年的高管薪酬,X 为一系列你认为可能影响高管 薪酬的解释变量, s 表示 S–1 个行业虚拟变量(基于上次作业中定义的一级行业分类变量 SIC 产生) t 表示 T–1 个年度虚拟变量吗,  it 为干扰项。 , 5. 基本统计量的呈现。呈现模型中涉及的所有变量的基本统计量(Mean, SD, median, min, max, N) ,并将结果输出整理到 word 文档中,并作简要分析。提示:建议使用 tabstat 命令进行统计,进而配合使用 logout 命令输出到 Excel 中,稍作整理后贴入 Word。 1    6. 变量的相关系数矩阵。 使用 pwcorr 或 pwcorr_a 命令计算文中核心变量的相关系数矩阵。 要求:小数点后统一保留三位有效数字;分别用***, **, * 标注 1%, 5%, 10%显著水平。 7. 回归分析 1。以回归模型 (1) 为基础,请呈现如下三种设定下下的回归结果: (1) 模型中仅包含 X;即仅考虑一般意义上的解释变量; (2) 模型中同时包含 X 和 s ;即进一步考虑行业虚拟变量,或曰行业特征; (3) 模型中同时包含 X, s 和 t ;即同时考虑行业特征和年度特征; 请简要分析你的结果。 (要求:采用 esttab 命令呈现上述三列结果,整理为 word 表格;系数估计值保留小数 点后三位; 括号中写 t 值, 保留小数点后两位, 标准误的计算采用异方差稳健性标准误;......

Words: 316 - Pages: 2

Ceo Compensation

...The Debate over CEO Compensation Analyzing Managerial Decisions: The Debate over CEO Compensation 1. Do you think the fact that most American CEOs are paid so much more than rank-and-file employees suggests CEOs are overpaid? Explain. I do not believe that just because American CEOs are paid much more than rank-and-file employees suggest that they are overpaid. Many CEOs whose salaries and compensation packages are discussed in the news are the CEOs from the largest American corporations and likely do not represent the average American CEO. Also, many times when CEO payouts are discussed in the news it is not a one year payout but instead a multi-year payout. Plus, many companies need to pay high salaries and incentives to attract successful CEOs from other companies. This alone drives the overall salary and compensation packages for CEOs but does not necessary point to them being overpaid. 2. Japanese CEOs generally receive much lower levels of compensation than CEOs in the United States. Does this imply that U.S. CEOs are overpaid? I do not believe that just because Japanese CEOs receive much lower salaries than United States CEOs implies that they are overpaid. I worked for Honda and one item that I learned in the past years is that there are large differences between the American and Japanese cultures. The Japanese very much frown upon employees that leave their companies. Japanese employees barely ever transfer companies unlike American...

Words: 944 - Pages: 4

Compensation

...MGT6033: COMPENSATION & BENEFITS MANAGEMENT ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- COURSEWORK / ASSIGNMENT I ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Prepared By: Lim Chee Seong (IC: 661007-08-6109) ------------------------------------------------- (Student ID: PACE 024747) ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Lecturer: Dr. Perema Kumari S Ponnampalam ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- a) Compensation management as one of the important link to the human resource management, has greatly affects the competency of an organisation or the corporate. Hence, the decision made by an organisation how to compensate its labours must be objectively and reasonably for the contribution from its labours in order to facilitate the corporate development and at the same time ensure the satisfaction of employee with monetary compensations......

Words: 2740 - Pages: 11

Ceo Compensation

...Shareholders Watchdog, Inc. 777 Wall Street New York, NY 10005 December 7, 2011 RE: Is CEO Compensation Fair? Dear employee, Accompanying this letter is our completed report that discusses the issue of the fairness of current CEO compensation. Although there are two sides of this argument, recent legislation and regulations for reform tend to support those who believe it is unfair. We have evaluated the current standards of CEO compensation and examined why both sides think they should prevail. There are some advantages that strongly support CEO’s huge salaries, including the following: * Provides incentives and motivates the CEO to obtain or surpass corporate objectives * Retains key-value leaders for the long-term, resulting in consistent corporate success * Creates a strong CEO confidence for him/her to reinvest in the corporation (bonds) Our overall research indicates that CEO compensation does not reflect actual performance in most cases. Many CEO’s are grossly over compensated (including stock options, bonuses, hedge funds, and other benefits). The “Golden Parachute” guarantee adds insult to injury. Based on our research, conducted from the UNLV Library periodicals database and online sources, we recommend the following: * Require corporations to adhere to sections 951, 953, 955 and 956 of the Dodd-Frank Bill * Maintain a collective (“Esprit de corps”) work force environment for all employees * Consult third party......

Words: 10991 - Pages: 44

Compensation

...incentive plans are rewards that recognize the executive’s progress toward fulfilling competitive strategy goals. Short term incentive compensation programs usually apply to group of select executives in a company. The plan applies to more than one executive because of the synergy that comes from the efforts and expertise of executives has an influence on corporate performance. There is a board of directors that determine the amount of the short term incentive award that will be given to each executive and it all depends on their ranking in the company and their compensation level. The CEO will receive a larger performance award than an executive who is the CFO or the Vice President because their position is at a lower level in the structure of the company. Some of the things that can affect an executives short term incentives are changes in profits, changes in value of stock and reduction in costs. Stock compensation or deferred compensation is an agreement between an employee and the organization to pay an employee at a future date. According to our text book this is a hallmark of an executive compensation package. Deferred compensation creates a sense of ownership that aligns the interests of the executive with those of the owners or shareholders of the organization for long term purposes. The amount of this long term incentive varies for every CEO. It also provides tax advantages; if they defer payments until they retire their payments will have a lower taxation. The......

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Compensation

...MGMT 6332 Compensation Final Exam 1. What are the behaviors that compensation ought to enforce? The first behavior compensation ought to enforce is that it must be attractive in order to recruit and hire high quality employees. Another behavior compensation ought to enforce is to make sure it is used in order to retain those high quality employees they recruited. It should also help to develop employee knowledge and skills and help to motivate the employees to perform to their highest ability while on the job (Milkovich, 2014, pg. 208-213). 2. Explain how personality characteristics can influence an employee's preference for rewards. Candidates are looking for jobs with reward systems that fit with their personalities. People that are more concerned with material things will be more concerned with the salary of a job, and people that have low self-esteem will most likely choose a larger organization that does not pay based on performance. On the other hand, those talented, outgoing, go-getter type personalities that like to take risks are more likely to choose an organization that pays for performance. Lastly, there are also people who are more individualists who would prefer to be in an organization where pay is based on individual performance rather than on group performance (Milkovich, 2014, pg. 317). 3. What are the four standards managers need to focus on when designing a pay-for performance system? There are four standards managers need to focus on wen......

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5

Ceo Compensation

...I think that people consider CEO compensation to be unfair because they simply see a large compensation. However, when determining if CEO compensation is fair I think there is more to be considered. People unaffiliated with the company are not going to have an unbiased opinion. Therefore, we need to look to those affiliated with the company of interest. Research shows that 93% of companies in the Russell 3000 index approved of their CEO's pay. (Feloni 2014) Also, we should consider that only 20% of CEO compensation is base pay, the rest is based on the performance of the company. Therefore, the majority of their compensation is contingent on working hard to see their company succeed. A paper by Kaplan and Joshua Rauh of Stanford found that the highest paid CEO’s also generated higher stock returns. “The highest-paid CEOs in terms of realized pay—the top 20% out of 1,700 firms—generated three-year stock returns that were 60% higher than those of other firms in their industries.” (Sumo and Weitzman 2013) It should also be noted that the increase of current CEO’s compensation packages are reflecting US stock highs. Finally, CEO’s are appointed. They have to climb the corporate ladder and have adequate qualifications. Therefore, it is not accurate or fair to compare their compensation to an average worker’s compensation. If you compare a CEO’s pay with other high –earning professionals their pay is reasonable. Steven Neil Kaplan, Neubauer Family Distinguished......

Words: 368 - Pages: 2

Ceo Compensation

...| CEO Compensation | | | | Jade Duan | 5/12/2012 | | INTRODUCTION Over the past a few decades, executive pay has risen dramatically in the United States. As of 1960, the average CEO at a large corporation made approximately $190,000 (equivalent to approximately $1.3 million today). The 1990s saw one of the greatest wealth transfers in history, as CEO pay skyrocketed. S&P companies CEO pay went from 1993 average of $3.7 to $17.4 million in 2000 [1]. In 2010 the highest paid CEO was Viacom's Philippe P. Dauman at $84.5 million in 9 months [2]. Motorola CEO, Sanjay Jha, pay package rose to $47 million in 2011, almost four times of his 2010 pay about $13 million [3]. As CEO compensation continues to soar while workers’ pay stalls, today, the average CEO makes 411 times more than the average worker (Figure 1). The explosion in executive pay has become controversial and criticized. The idea that stock options and other alleged pay-for-performance are driven by economics has also been questioned. Figure 1. Ratio of average CEO Pay to average production worker compensation in America Observers differ as to whether this rise is a natural and beneficial result of competition for scarce business talent that can add greatly to stockholder value in large companies, or a socially harmful phenomenon brought about by social and political changes that have given executives greater control over their own pay. "Today the idea that huge paychecks are part of a......

Words: 5460 - Pages: 22

Case Study: the Debate over Ceo Compensation

...CASE STUDY: The Debate over CEO Compensation The most visible and highly paid person in most corporations is the chief executive officer (CEO). CEO compensation is particularly important to firms for three reasons. First, the compensation package is likely to be important in attracting and retaining good CEOs. Second, the form of the pay contract is likely to help determine whether the CEO focuses on value maximization or some other objective. Third, employees throughout the organization carefully follow their CEO’s pay. Important morale problems can occur when employees think that the CEO is overpaid. For instance, employees complain bitterly when they are asked to take pay cuts because the company is in trouble, yet at the same time the CEO gets a big raise. Controversy over CEO pay has increased substantially in recent years. One charge is that the level of CEO pay is too high. CEO pay is so huge that people don’t believe they deserve it. It is easy to pint to many ECOS who report compensation in the millions of dollars (reported compensation figures typically include salary and bonus payments, as well as gains from the exercise of stock options). Consider the following two examples. Investors were outraged when E Trade Group Inc. disclosed it had paid out a $77 million compensation package for CEO Christos M. Cotsakos in 2001- a year in which the financial-services company lost $242 million. When Cotsakos pledged later to return $21 million, the......

Words: 517 - Pages: 3

Determinants of Ceo Compensation in Banking Industry

...DETERMINANTS OF CEO COMPENSATION: EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIAN BANKING INDUSTRY CHONG KOK CHIEK (AC082799) MUHAMMAD AZWAN BIN MOHD ARIFFIN (AC082868) SITI SUHANNA BINTI ABDUL GHANI (AC083010) BACHELOR OF ACCOUNTING (HONS.) COLLEGE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING UNIVERSITI TENAGA NASIONAL 2012 DECLARATION We hereby declare that this project is our original work except for quotations and citations which have been duly acknowledged and that it has not been previously and/or concurrently submitted for any other degree at Universiti Tenaga Nasional and/or other institutions. CHONG KOK CHIEK AC 082799 MUHAMMAD AZWAN MOHD ARIFFIN AC 082868 SITI SUHANNA ABDUL GHANI AC 083010 Date of submission: 13th August 2012 i ACKNOWLEGDEMENT We would like to express our sincere gratitude to our project supervisor, Mr. Wan Mohammad Taufik bin Wan Abdullah, lecturer of Department of Accounting of Universiti Tenaga Nasional, for his valuable advices and continuous guidance throughout the research process. Mr. Taufik spent a lot of time enlightening us on various issues, giving us a comprehensive view in the academic aspect via our meetings within his busy working schedule. It is our pleasure to have him as our project supervisor. Without his unconditional support and care, our project could not be finished effectively. He let us try different approaches with confidence in the process, assisting us to solve a lot of problems especially at the time when we......

Words: 15228 - Pages: 61