Critical Thinking - Checkpoint - Argument Credibility

In: Other Topics

Submitted By hpeist77
Words 1085
Pages 5
CheckPoint - Argument Credibility
Locate a link to an online video or print news story from your favorite online news source. Your choice of source may range from a major news network to a small opinion magazine, but should not include YouTube or Google VideoTM video search.
Select a story in which claims are made, and note the story title and source name. If you cannot obtain a direct link to a video, write a summary of the video’s key points and provide a link to the Web site where you found the clip.

Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response:

 What claims are being made?
 Do the claims conflict with your personal observations?
 What background information do you have about the claims?
 What is the expertise of the author, if any?
 Is the author biased and untrustworthy, or unbiased and trustworthy?

The article I chose is, Greece Nears the Precipice, Raising Fear by Landon Thomas Jr., Published: September 19, 2011 - NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/business/global/as-greece-struggles-the-world-imagines-a-default.html?ref=economy I chose this article for its argumentative but explanatory explanation on the topic of Greece’s debt problems. This article describes the recent economic troubles in Greece and possibilities of default on government debt. The article claims that if Greece does not act upon its debt and default larger problems can arise in their economy as well as other parts of Europe. The article states, "My view is that it is very much in Greece’s interest to default now, as there is no prospect that it can repay its debt,” said Desmond Lachman, a former I.M.F. economist at the American Enterprise Institute. “If it is inevitable that an insolvent Greece is going to have to restructure, it would be better for Greece to do it now.” This is a powerful closing at…...

Similar Documents

Critical Thinking

...What Is Critical Thinking CRT/205 Our decisions reflect our conclusions in life. So it is best that we make sure we have the right conclusions so we do not make bad decisions. We can do this through critical thinking. Beliefs come from conclusions that we have made. When we have concluded something is the way it is, we believe it. And when we tell someone this belief it is known as a claim. A claim can be true or false. So if I tell someone the tv is broken and is no good it is true for that moment but the tv may still be good. Someone else could reattach a loose wire and the tv would be back as good as new. Another thing in critical thinking are issues. Issues are basically another word for questions. When thinking or in an argument there are usually issues. Everytime you question if something is true or if it’s the best option, this is an issue. Issues are good in critical thinking to help you get the conclusion you need on a topic. When we give ourselves reason to except a claim we have produced an argument. The reason for accepting a claim is called a premise. And an argument is where the premise is intended to prvide a reason for accepting the conclusion. So if I am thinking about buying a car, the issue I have is should I buy one and can I afford it. I tell myself I make x amount of money and I am responsible so I should get the car. Now I have an argument. But if I sit back and think into more detail I may find that buying this car may not be exactly what I......

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Psy 265 Checkpoint Critical Thinking and Sexual Decision Making

... I try to maintain the view of a skeptic as a constant guard against making poor decisions about sexual activity. I consider this a critical thinking tool that allows me to better analyze the situation from both side of the issue. What will happen if I do this? What will happen if I don't do that? I also try to hold my own center without letting any ones else's views sway my opinion. In out society, peer pressure is always a strong factor in making sexual decisions. It is important to learn how to ignore peer pressure when making decision that are crucial to a decision that involves sexual activity. Getting a sexually transmitted disease is a critical aspect of that decision and having a baby is another one. Asking whether I am putting myself at risk for one of those thing happening is something to consider when making those type of decision. Can I this person be HIV positive? These can be life threatening decision that must and have to be made. The critical thinking process is very appropriate for both male and female when considering sexual decision. Most young people are very impulsive when it comes to making sexual decision. They are inclined to act on the spur of the moment without even thinking about what there impulsive behavior can lead to in the long run. They do not apply critical thinking to this emotionally charged situation. I would not engage in sex with someone who I did not know or someone who I was not familiar with on a long term...

Words: 358 - Pages: 2

Critical Thinking

...Critical thinking is about being skeptical or questioning about statements, propositions, information or norms. Introduction In critical thinking, one is challenged to question the thoughts, statements and information put forth by others. In order to exercise healthy critical thinking, one must be able to differentiate between a claim and an argument. A claim is a statement of thought put forth by the other individual, group of people or organization. On the other hand, an argument is a wholesome debate involving at least two opposing parties, either individuals, group of people or organizations. A claim asserted, can lead to an argument. In this paper, we will analyze arguments in an academic essay and how best to support those arguments. Published research To support an argument, one can strongly back up the assertions made with factual findings especially ones from scientific studies, published researches or validated printings. According to Shields (2010), in her book Essay Writing: A Student’s Guide, one can gather information by reading textbooks and assigned readings. From there, one can establish the back-up needed to prove the credibility of the arguments put forth. Experimental findings Besides that, arguments can also be supported using one’s own findings from the scientific experiments or sociology studies that he has conducted. In his book Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide, Redman (2006) suggests that one should use outcomes of......

Words: 464 - Pages: 2

Critical Thinking

...Critical Thinking: Leadership-Development Programs University of Maryland University College Introduction Critical thinking is a process by which a thinker can improve the quality of their thinking through a process. It involves a series of process, that actively and skillfully conceptualizing, evaluating, applying, and analyzing information to reach an answer or a conclusion. This allows the reader to process the information received to come to a reasonable conclusion based on a reasoned process. This process involve the utilization of the ten step methodology presented in Browne and Keeley’s book called “Asking the Right Questions”. These steps are used to achieve a clearer understanding of the issues being evaluated. In this paper, I will be using Browne and Keeley’s ten step methodology presented in “Asking the right questions” to analyze the memo title “Leadership Development Program” writing by Mr. Anil Ravaswami to Ms. Cynthia Castle (CEO of Cliffside Holding Company of Massapequa CHCM). I will be analyzing the memo by going through each steps of the critical thinking model. This is to show my level of understanding of the intended messages being conveyed by Mr. A. Ravaswami’s memo. Critical Thinking: Leadership-Development Programs In Browne and Keeley’s book “Asking the Right Question”, Browne and Keeley discuss what the characteristics of an active reader or listener is. Browne and Keeley indicated that an active reader or listener is one who possesses......

Words: 1806 - Pages: 8

Critical Thinking

...Critical Thinking and Language Essay Benjamin Antillon PHL/251 Dr. Lentz June 23, 2009 Prior to moving to Las Vegas all I would hear is “Las Vegas is hot as hell”. Who really knows how hot hell really is? As far as we know hell could be a comfortable seventy-two degrees and fully stocked with bible thumping Christians vying for my acceptance to Christianity. Who knows but the omnipotent rock star or god or ala (take your pick), whichever one sends the biggest shivers down your spine and lets you spill your guts to redemption. As far as hell goes I’ll let you know when I get there, but as for the Las Vegas heat goes it’s hot, but manageable as a Las Vegas stripper in heat. How does language empower or limit thoughts Language can empower or limit our expressions and thoughts. Metaphors are an implied comparison between an object or an action, but not literal. Metaphors can enrich perception and understanding by bringing clarity and understanding to the language in order to better help others understand your perspectives. Metaphors although can help the clarity of ones thoughts or perspectives, it can also limit ones understanding. Language reveals or demonstrates a particular society, thus a metaphor in one society may have a completely other meaning in another. It is this that can limit the power of metaphors and lead to a translation of murkiness. An example of this is when your telling a story and you are describing a car in your metaphor, your......

Words: 796 - Pages: 4

Argument Paper/Critical Thinking

...is a problem that needs to be addressed and some sort of action is a must. This is where the debate of the needle exchange program, or NEP’s (community-based initiatives that allow intravenous (IV) drug users to exchange used syringes for clean, sterile ones in an effort to stem the spread of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B, C and other blood-borne pathogens) enter the conversation.( Past/Future - Needle Exchange | The Age Of Aids | FRONTLINE | PBS.) The NEP is a program that is always met with large amounts of opposition by the public, as well as government apprehension. Considering the recent increases in heroin addiction, many cities all over the world have reluctantly started their own form of a Needle Exchange Program. There are many valid arguments opposing the needle exchange program, but with heroin use spiking higher and quicker than ever before and NEP’s not only lowering the spread of disease but overdose deaths as well, and that people are more likely to change their lives after their encounters with NEP’s, it is imperative that the Needle Exchange Program continue to be funded by the United States Government. In the 1970s and 80’s, Heroin, which was the DOC (drug of choice) among celebrities and inner-city addicts alike but its popularity declined in the 1980s as the HIV/AIDS crisis brought worries of infection-carrying needles and therefore the crack, a cheap substitute for the, “addict on a budget,” but now experts say, heroin is officially back. (NyTimes.com, 1994)...

Words: 1788 - Pages: 8

Critical Thinking

...Critical Thinking Student Name Institution Affiliation Critical Thinking Critical thinking is where all biases and preconceptions are put aside when analyzing an issue (Bowell & Kemp, 2002). Decision-making is a cognitive activity that is either rational or irrational. It is influenced by individual characteristics such as experience and personality (Horvath, 2011). In this case study, there is a need for a step by step analysis of how things unfolded as this is a very fragile situation. Rushing to make a decision before conducting proper investigations and consultations with affected parties may affect the smooth running of the organization resulting in massive losses. What are the Facts? Bob is a fresh graduate who has just joined the company. He has no job experience and, therefore, the probability of making mistakes is very high. Mostly, the knowledge learners get in school is not enough to equip them with skills required in industries. Having this in mind, I, being the lead supervisor, will have to come up with ways to handle Bob, a junior supervisor with no work setting experience. Maybe I gave Bob a huge responsibility of developing a work schedule, something he has never done. I should have guided him through that process to come up with the most relevant work schedule. Two setups were made. One was made by Bob. This set-up could have led to work delay, so Coot, a very experienced worker decided to come with a more relevant work schedule. Coot’s set-up......

Words: 2435 - Pages: 10

Critical Thinking

...following: Define critical thinking. Critical thinking is defined as making reasoned judgments that are logical and well thought out. It is a way of thinking in which you don't accept all arguments and conclusions you are exposed to but rather have an attitude involving questioning such arguments and conclusions. Critical thinking can be divided into three core skills: Curiosity- The desire to learn more information. Skepticism- Having a healthy questioning attitude about new information. Humanity- The ability to admit that your ideas or opinions are wrong, when faced with new convincing evidence. * Discuss how the following terms relate to critical thinking: bias, issues, arguments, and relativism * Bias: A bias is based on emotional distortional cognition and decision making due to emotional reasoning. Being bias blocks a person from critically thinking on making decisions. * Issues: A question, when critically thinking a person has to ask a series of questions to come up with the rite solution. * Arguments: Arguments are closely related to critical thinking because arguments is the reasoning behind critical thinking arguments is a key component to critically thinking. * Relativism: Has no absolute truth or validity, having only relative, subjective value according to differences in perception and consideration. * Describe a decision or argument you recently made which was influenced by bias Reviewing Ch. 1 of Critical Thinking, share what......

Words: 531 - Pages: 3

Critical Thinking

...* This assignment will showcase your ability to recognize and examine argument structure.  Please be sure to follow all of the assignment guidelines, which your instructor will give to you in class or listed below.

 * In this week's assignment, we are going to take a look at a couple of arguments related to an immensely controversial idea in our society, the idea of same-sex marriage. At the end of Chapter Six you will find two different opinions, Justice Margaret Marshall’s majority opinion on Goodridge v. Department of Public Health  and Matthew Spalding’s “A Defining Moment for Marriage and Self-Government.  While many of you may have strong opinions on one side or the other of this debate, this week we're asking you to set your own opinions aside, and see if we can begin to identify the different parts of the argument.

Directions: Specifically, read through these two articles and choose ONE of them. Then, for your chosen article, identify the various parts of the argument as they are described in chapter six of your text. Explain how the various parts work together to prove an overall claim. Again, you are NOT asked in this assignment to give your opinion on same-sex marriage or your stance on the issue, but to describe the argument being made and explain how those different parts work together.

PLEASE NOTE: This assignment is not asking for a summary of the articles nor your perspective on this issue. Instead, in this assignment and many others, you will......

Words: 966 - Pages: 4

Critical Thinking

...ABSTRACT: This report explores critical discourse analysis as a theory in rhetoric discourse and speech act and pragmatics. The framework of analysis includes the mixture of my own ideas and theory of various experts such and Aristotle, Tuan Van Dijk, H.P Grice and Robert Dilts. As critical discourse analysis is a very flexible term of social linguistic study and it allows one to go with the own ideas, here I have chosen suitable analytical tool of experts to analyze the two different discourse, one is verbal discourse ( Tryst with Destiny) and second is written discourse ( Toyoda’s statement 2013) and at the end comparison of both discourse. Key words: critical discourse analysis, rhetoric discourse, speech act, pragmatics, social linguistic, tryst with destiny, Toyoda’s statement 2013. INTRODUCTION Critical discourse analysis (CDA) comprises three inter-related processes of analysis which are linked up with three inter-related dimensions of discourse. Three inter-related process of analysis. 1) Text analysis (description) 2) Processing analysis ( interpretation) 3) Social analysis ( explanation) Three inter-related dimensions of CDA. 1) Discourse structure (systematically and explicitly described structure at all level) 2) Social structure (in the context of society) 3) Cognitive structure ( mental cognitive interface) The three dimensions of CDA is coherently related with each other to make up a substantial discourse where mental......

Words: 1862 - Pages: 8

Critical Thinking

...Critical Thinking The term critical thinking refers to the thought processes used to evaluate information and the practice of using such conclusions to guide behavior. The process of critical thinking is associated with accuracy, logic, depth, fairness, credibility, and intellectual clarity. The word “critical” is not used to imply negativity or pessimism. Critical thinking merely means that one must not automatically accept the validity of the information he or she is given. Someone who has strong critical thinking skills has a sense of curiosity and is interested in finding innovative solutions to problems. He or she is willing to examine previously held beliefs, opinions, or assumptions and objectively weigh them against facts—admitting when a lack of understanding or information impairs the decision making process and adjusting conclusions as needed to accommodate the introduction of new information. In this way, a person with strong critical thinking skills can be described as self-directed, self-monitored, and self-disciplined. Critical thinkers analyze situations and suspend judgment until all available data has been gathered and considered. This approach will make you more competitive in the workplace, since the ability to make logical decisions based on an analysis of all available data is an important part of success in the business environment. Throughout your college career in the Malcolm Baldrige School of Business at Post University you will be......

Words: 693 - Pages: 3

Critical Thinking

...2 of 56 Clear Thinking, Critical Thinking, and Clear Writing Students will learn to … 1. Determine acceptable and unacceptable degrees of vagueness in language 2. Understand and identify types of ambiguity 3. Identify the problems generality causes in language 4. Use definitions to increase precision and clarity and to influence attitudes 5. Understand the types of definitions 6. Acquire skills for writing an effective argumentative essay rom August 1987 until January 2007, Alan Greenspan was chairman of the Federal Reserve Board (“the Fed”). Because any remark he made about U.S. monetary policy could cause markets all over the world to fluctuate wildly, he developed a complicated way of speaking that came to be known as “Fedspeak.” Here’s an example: It is a tricky problem to find the particular calibration in timing that would be appropriate to 2/9/2016 12:17 PM 3 of 56 stem the acceleration in risk premiums created by falling incomes without prematurely aborting the decline in the inflation-generated risk premiums.* Greenspan has admitted that such remarks were not really intended to be understood. Asked to give an example by commenting on the weather, Greenspan replied, I would generally expect that today in Washington, D.C., the probability of changes in the weather is highly uncertain. But we are monitoring the data in such a manner that we will be able to update people on changes that are important.* Page 70 2/9/2016 12:17 PM This tells us nothing about the......

Words: 15340 - Pages: 62

Critical Thinking

...CheckPoint: Argument Credibility CRT205 Critical Thinking September 5, 2010   In this 11 Alive news video, the claim is being made that Federal Judge Jack Camp was buying drugs for himself and a stripper. In a Federal sting, Judge Camp is caught on video and audio buying drugs. Also, the stripper claims the Judge snorted cocaine in her presence. These claims conflict with my personal observations of what judges should and should not do. However, they do not conflict with my personal observations of what men will get into to have a good time with a sexy woman. From what I know, what I have seen and what I learned about men throughout the years, men will do just about anything to get with a sexy woman, who may be younger (most cases they are younger). I have seen powerful, well-known men give up everything they have accomplished, especially their marriage, to be with a young, nubile woman. Judge Camp saw this informant, wanted her and took a chance. Judge Camp took the chance and got caught, as reported by Kevin Rowson, a reporter for CBS 11 Alive News. Even though Rowson broke the story, his information was gleamed from a criminal complaint filed by the FBI. The FBI received the information from the stripper (they didn’t name her in the story), who is also a confidential informant. With her accusation alone, I would not have believed this story outright. However, the story has more credibility with the FBI conducting an undercover operation and validating her......

Words: 269 - Pages: 2

Critical Thinking

...comprehensiveness allows instructors to tailor the material to their individual teaching styles, resulting in an exceptionally versatile text. Highlights of the Fourth Edition: Additional readings and essays in a new Appendix as well as in Chapters 7 and 8 nearly double the number of readings available for critical analysis and classroom discussion. An online chapter, available on the instructor portion of the book’s Web site, addresses critical reading, a vital skill for success in college and beyond. Visit www.mhhe.com/bassham4e for a wealth of additional student and instructor resources. Bassham I Irwin Nardone I Wallace New and updated exercises and examples throughout the text allow students to practice and apply what they learn. MD DALIM #1062017 12/13/09 CYAN MAG YELO BLK Chapter 12 features an expanded and reorganized discussion of evaluating Internet sources. Critical Thinking thinking, using real-world examples and a proven step-by-step approach. A student ' s Introduction A student's Introduction everyday culture and critical thinking. It covers all the basics of critical Critical Thinking Ba ssha m I Irwin I Nardone I Wall ace CRITICAL THINKING A STUDENT’S INTRODUCTION FOURTH EDITION Gregory Bassham William Irwin Henry Nardone James M. Wallace King’s College TM bas07437_fm_i-xvi.indd i 11/24/09 9:53:56 AM TM Published by McGraw-Hill, an imprint of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright ©......

Words: 246535 - Pages: 987

Critical Thinking

...Guidelines for Using the Standards In thinking through any problem, the critical thinker must apply the Intellectual Standards to each of the Elements in order to avoid possible mistakes. The following table summarizes some of the key guidelines (or "checkpoints") for checking one's reasoning against the standards of critical thinking. All reasoning has a purpose • State your purpose clearly • Choose a significant purpose • Distinguish it from related purposes • Make sure it is fair in context • Periodically check to be sure you remain focused on your purpose All reasoning seeks to settle some question • State the question clearly and precisely • Clarify the question's meaning and scope by expressing it several ways • Determine whether the question has one right answer, is a matter of opinion, or demands reasoning from more than one point of view • Think through the question deeply (plumb its complexities) All reasoning is based on assumptions • Clearly identify your assumptions • Determine whether they are justifiable • Consider how your point of view is shaped by your assumptions All reasoning occurs from some point of view • Clearly identify your point of view • Seek other relevant points of view and identify their strengths and weaknesses • Strive for fair-mindedness in evaluating all points of view All reasoning is based on information • Claim only what you can support with the information you have • Seek information that opposes your position as......

Words: 366 - Pages: 2