Hofstede's Dimensions of Culture

In: Business and Management

Submitted By bakait
Words 1743
Pages 7
Hofstede's Dimensions of Culture

Geert H. Hofstede was born on October 2, 1928 in Haarlem, the Netherlands. He received his M.Sc. from the Delft Institute of Technology in 1953, his Ph.D. (cum laude) from Groningen University in 1967. Hofstede is most well known for his work on four dimensions of cultural variability, commonly referred to as "Hofstede's Dimensions." These include: Uncertainty Avoidance, Power Distance, Masculinity-Femininity, Individualism-Collectivism, and Long-Term/Short Term Orientation. These dimensions were arrived in his 1980 publication, "Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values." The study took existing survey data (sample size of 116,000) collected from a multinational corporation (IBM). The result was a score in each of the dimensions for 40 different countries.
During 1978-83, the Dutch cultural anthropologist Geert Hofstede conducted detailed interviews with hundreds of IBM employees in 53 countries. Through standard statistical analysis of fairly large data sets, he was able to determine patterns of similarities and differences among the replies. From this data analysis, he formulated his theory that world cultures vary along consistent, fundamental dimensions. Since his subjects were constrained to one multinational corporation's world-wide employees, and thus to one company culture, he ascribed their differences to the effects of their national cultures. (One weakness is that he maintained that each country has just one dominant culture.)
In the 1990s, Hofstede published a more accessible version of his research publication in Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind [Hofstede]. His focus was not on defining culture as refinement of the mind (or "highly civilized" attitudes and behavior) but rather on highlighting essential patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting that are…...

Similar Documents

Hofstede's Cultural Dimension

...Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions: A Comparison of Greece and U.S. Human Resource Management Approaches By Kelly M. Mistretta MBOL2 MBA 533, Human Resource in Management Dr. James C. Dumville Saint Leo University – Center for Online Learning September 9, 2012 Name: Kelly Mistretta Title: Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions: A Comparison of Greece and U.S. Human Resource Management Approaches Date: September 9, 2012 Abstract Globalization continues to become more important in the business culture in our world. No longer can management focus only on companies within their own country. Businesses are forced to compete with companies from other countries. With the increased global competition, a business must understand other cultures if they hope to remain competitive and have continued success. There are several models that show the influence of cultural differences between nations. Hofstede’s model, called the theory of cultural relativity of organization practices is the most recognized model. Hofstede’s model focuses on cultural influences and work behaviors in five different dimensions. Each dimension has important implications in understanding business. This paper will compare the Hofstede analysis of Greece and the United States. Biographical Sketch Kelly Mistretta is currently an MBA student at Saint Leo University. Mistretta has a BA in Accounting and plans to obtain an MBA to equip her with improved business skills to better contribute to......

Words: 1324 - Pages: 6

Geert Hofstede's 5 Cultural Dimensions

...Professor Geert Hofstede is celebrated for his 1980s theory of the 5s dimensions. “Professor Geert Hofstede conducted one of the most comprehensive studies of how values in the workplace are influenced by culture” (geert-hofstede.com). In theory he discusses the factual evidence that culture is programmed by groups and diversities make collective differences large enough to categorize. Hofstede’s dimensions are useful to distinguish what is considered valuable to which groups/ societies. Hofstede was able to pinpoint areas that have toleration for each country. The five dimensions include: Power Distance (PDI): PDI measures the amount of acceptance dictated by the powerful for each culture. “In cultures with low power distance, people are likely to expect that power is distributed rather equally, and are furthermore also likely to accept that power is distributed to less powerful individuals” (businessmate.org). For instance, when the PDI is high for a country, people are most likely more accepting of the unbalanced nature. They have accepted the inequality as part of the rights of those with the power. PDI measures the extent to which a community will accept this division and inequality. Low Power distance would include equality factors like decentralized government with constant questioning of authority, conscious democratic structure where society is actively part of its management. High Power Distance societies are centralized hierarchical structures that......

Words: 1080 - Pages: 5

Five Dimension of Culture

...Five Dimensions of Culture Individual Work Week 6 Raymond D’Aloisio MAN 2501-12 Everest University Orlando South Five Dimensions of Culture Dr Geert Hofstede did some extensive research to create the Five Dimensions of Culture. This research produces some interesting information for everyone to understand. What does this technology have to show us? Does this explain the means that people of different cultures find themselves working together and communicating more? How can we understand cultural differences? From the information Dr Hofstede put together here is a table with the breakdown of his work. “The Five Dimensions of Culture are armed with a large database of cultural statistics, analyzed and found clear patterns of similarity and difference amid responses along these five dimensions.” (Hofstede, G. 1970). The five dimensions are: Power/Distance – refers to the degree on inequality that exist and accepted worldwide. | Characteristics | Tips | High PD | * Centralized companies. * Strong hierarchies. * Large gaps in compensation, authority, and respect. | * Acknowledge a leader's power. * Be aware that you may need to go to the top for answers | Low PD | * Flatter organizations. * Supervisors and * Employees are considered almost as equals. | * Use teamwork. * Involve as many people as possible in decision making. | Individualism – the strength of ties people have within the community. | Characteristics | Tips | High...

Words: 793 - Pages: 4

Analysis on Hofstede's Cultural Dimension

...to Sweeney (2002), Geert Hofstede’s work on cultural dimension is considered to be very important to National Cultural attribute to a person’s value. However, in this article, the method of Hofstede's work are heavily criticised as the method used to formulate the notion are unreliable and misinterpreted as the author argues. Although the questionnaires used in Hofstede’s research were filled by 117,000 people, across 66 countries working in IBM, it is not guaranteed that these people effectively represent the national culture. Hofstede argued that values are formed in school and universities. Countering this argument the writer stated that, all schools and universities do not operate in the same standard. Furthermore, organizational culture also sufficiently influences the answers. Hence, questioning people from the same organization, performing similar job, doesn’t adequately support Hofstede’s methodology. The writer has mentioned in assumption two: the national is identifiable in the micro- local that triggers Hofstede’s argue in two ways where national culture is supposed to be carried by all individuals in a nation. Firstly, presupposition may not come with great outcome in all the time based on local sites of analysis. Apart from this, without supposition there are no valid grounds for treating local as representative of the national. Secondly, Hofstede defined occupational and organizational cultures as uniform. He also stated national culture only as average or......

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Hofstede's Dimensions of Culture

...Hofstede's Dimensions of Culture Geert H. Hofstede was born on October 2, 1928 in Haarlem, the Netherlands. He received his  M.Sc. from the Delft Institute of Technology in 1953, his Ph.D. (cum laude) from Groningen University in 1967. Hofstede served in the Netherlands Army from 1953 to 1955. In 1955, he married Maaike A. Van den Hoek. They've also "lived happily ever after", but I'm not sure where (probably Brussels, Belgium). Hofstede is most well known for his work on four dimensions of cultural variability, commonly referred to as "Hofstede's Dimensions." These include: Uncertainty Avoidance, Power Distance, Masculinity-Femininity, Individualism-Collectivism, Confucian Dynamism. These dimensions were arrived in his 1980 publication, "Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values." The study took existing survey data (sample size of 116,000) collected from a multinational corporation (IBM). The result was a score in each of the dimensions for 40 different countries. During 1978-83, the Dutch cultural anthropologist Geert Hofstede conducted detailed interviews with hundreds of IBM employees in 53 countries. Through standard statistical analysis of fairly large data sets, he was able to determine patterns of similarities and differences among the replies. From this data analysis, he formulated his theory that world cultures vary along consistent, fundamental dimensions. Since his subjects were constrained to one multinational corporation's......

Words: 1232 - Pages: 5

Hofstede's Dimensions Italy

...in Italy to demonstrate power and let other people understand that they should have respect. According to Hofstede, the consequences of power distance are more evident in Southern Italy. (Hofstede, 2013a) All in all Italian companies have a rigid hierarchy (DePauw University, n.d.) and inequalities are part of the Italian culture. Of course, there are other cultures with a higher PDI, but 50 is also a reasonable value and therefore (visible) differences between managers and subordinates or between the poor and the rich are normal in Italy. www.haufe.de [10.10.2013] 3 Collectivism vs. Individualism This dimension deals with the degree of interdependence between the members of a certain society. The central point includes how people in such a society view themselves in terms of “I” (the person on its own) or in terms of “We” (the whole society). On the one hand in individualistic countries looking after themselves and their family would be much more important than taking care of other people. However, collectivistic societies belong to group-thinking and exchanging information with the whole country (Hofstede, 2013a). Italy is an individualistic culture at a score of 76, as the “I” perspective is more distinct than the “We” perspective. The family itself is an important variable for the Italian people. The members of such a society would become motivated from creating their own ideas and objectives which could also lead to personal fulfillment (Hofstede, 2013a). Some......

Words: 1866 - Pages: 8

Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions

...notion of culture. Leung et al (2005) define culture as “the values, beliefs, norms, and behavioural patterns of a national group.” Czinkota argues that “culture is an integrated system of learned behaviour patterns that are distinguishing characteristics of the members of any given society” (2011). Nakata and Huang (2002, cited by Yaprak) define culture as “the complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, customs, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society”, as an individual. Siew et al. argue that “culture is a complex and broad construct that is difficult to accurately measure” (2007). However, scholars have tried to theorize it through several frameworks. In this essay, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the GLOBE study dimensions are compared in order to assess the frameworks’ abilities to accurately measure culture. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions were created as a result of an empirical research of the employees of a global company in order to identify the different work motivations caused by the employees’ nationalities (2001, cited by De Mooji, 2013). The dimensions were constructed at the national level and thus their variables offer insights on nations. They do not correlate at individual or organizational level. However, scholars have misapplied Hofstede’s dimensions to individuals and organizations, which resulted in flawed conclusions at individual level (Venaik and Brewer, 2013). A criticism of Hofstede’s......

Words: 976 - Pages: 4

Hofstede's 6 Dimensions

...Hofstede's six basic cultural dimensions • Power distance (PDI), or the degree to which members of a national culture automatically accept a hierarchical or unequal distribution of power in organizations and the society; This dimension expresses the degree to which the less powerful members of a society accept and expect that power is distributed unequally. The fundamental issue here is how a society handles inequalities among people. People in societies exhibiting a large degree of power distance accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further justification. In societies with low power distance, people strive to equalize the distribution of power and demand justification for inequalities of power • Individualism-collectivism (IDV), or the degree to which individuals in a given national culture perceive themselves as separate from others and free from group pressure to conform; The high side of this dimension, called Individualism, can be defined as a preference for a loosely-knit social framework in which individuals are expected to take care of themselves and their immediate families only. Its opposite, Collectivism, represents a preference for a tightly-knit framework in society in which individuals can expect their relatives or members of a particular in-group to look after them in exchange for unquestioning loyalty. A society's position on this dimension is reflected in whether people’s self-image is defined in terms......

Words: 617 - Pages: 3

Culture Dimensions

...The Theory of Individualism and collectivism in the Translation of Address Terms 1. Introduction In 1980, Hofstede made his original study on cultural dimension of individualism and collectivism. Since then, many researchers have focused their attention on this field. Individualism versus collectivism has been established “as one of the basic pattern variables that determine human action” and “Individualistic and collectivistic value tendencies are manifested in everyday family, school, and workplace interaction” (Samovar, Porter and McDaniel, 2010). Since culture and translation enjoys a close relationship, individualism versus collectivism, as one of the theory in cross-cultural communication, plays a significant role in Chinese-English translation. When focusing on the translation of address terms, we can easily find the changes in the rendition of them which are due to the difference of value tendencies between Chinese collectivism and western individualism. And many scholars believe that the theory of individualism and collectivism functions in the translation of address terms. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to make a further discussion on the Chinese-English translation of address terms under the guidance theory of individualism and collectivism. Individualism and collectivism The concept of individualism and collectivism has been widely discussed in the field of cross-cultural communication and many scholars have given their own definitions. In this part, we......

Words: 2165 - Pages: 9

Hofstede’s 5 Dimensions

...based on seniority or age • lack of tolerance for deviants • strong need for consensus • need for predictability hence, planning is important • respect for authority INDIVIDUALISTIC CULTURES – INDIVIDUALISM - COLLECTIVISM • foster contractual relationships that are based on the principles of exchange. They calculate profit and loss before engaging in a behavior. • focus on self or at most on close loved ones, are concerned with the relationship between their behaviors and their own needs, interests & goals. • value independence & self-sufficiency place self interests above collective interests accept confrontation as an attribute • emphasize pleasure, fun & personal enjoyment more than social norms and duties belong to many in- groups that exert little influence on their lives • believe that their beliefs are unique • give precedence to horizontal relationships (e.g. spouse-spouse) over vertical relationships (e.g. parent- child) COLLECTIVISTIC CULTURES - • behave according to social norms that are designed to maintain social harmony among members of an in- group • consider implications of their actions for wider collective • share resources and are prepared to sacrifice personal interest for collective interests • favor certain in-groups (e.g. family, friends). The Chinese culture, for example, believes that one’s elf- esteem and future are tied to one’s in-groups such as parents, siblings, friends. • belong to a small number of in-groups that influence......

Words: 420 - Pages: 2

Hofstede Model of Culture Dimensions

...Model of Cultural Dimensions The main part of Prof. Geert Hofstede’s study or Model of Cultural Dimensions is “how values in the workplace are influenced by culture.” From 1967 to 1973 Prof. Hofstede collected and analyzed data base of employees value scores. Actually this data was collected by IBM from more than 70 countries. The total number of countries was divided into 3 parts to make the analysis easy. In first part they considered largest 40 countries to analyze data. Then he extended the analysis to remaining 40 countries and 3 regions. Based on IBM study replications and extensions, international population and cultural factors includes 74 countries for Prof. Geert Hofstede’s ranking scores from 2001. The four primary Dimensions of Hofstede’s Model to assist in differentiating cultures are: Power Distance – PDI, Individualism – IDV, Masculinity – MAS, and Uncertainty Avoidance – UAI Additional fifth Dimension developed after study with Chinese employees and managers and applied for 23 countries- Based on Confucian dynamism (Long-Term Orientation – LTO) The dimensions are related to the other country, cultural, and religious paradigms. About Hofstede (Small Biography) Name: Gerard Hendrik Hofstede Dutch organizational sociologist Studied: the interactions between national cultures and organizational cultures Date of Birth: 3 October 1928 Place of Birth: Haarlem Work: Author of several books including Culture’s Consequences and Cultures and......

Words: 300 - Pages: 2

Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions: Jamaica

...Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions: Jamaica Gerard Hendrik Hofstede was born on October 2, 1928 in The Netherlands. He received his PhD in social psychology in 1967. Dr. Hofstede founded and managed the Personnel Research Department at IBM International. IBM is where he began his research on culture, which led to his Cultural Dimensions Theory. Dr. Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory consists of a model on national culture. The national culture model is made up of six dimensions: Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance, Long Term Orientation and Indulgence. Jamaica is an island located in the Caribbean Sea. The island is just over 4,200 square miles and is just south of Cuba. There are currently 2.9 million people living in Jamaica. The Arawaks, also called Tainos, originally inhabited the island. The Arawaks were from South America and called the island Xaymaca, which meant “land of wood and water”. Christopher Columbus landed on the island on May 5, 1494 after the Cubans described the island as “the land of blessed gold”. The island did not contain gold. Columbus claimed the land for Spain and enslaved the Arawaks. The Arawaks quickly died off from disease and the harsh conditions of their newfound enslavement. The Spanish used the island as a supply base. Horses, men, food and arms were shipped and stored in Jamaica to aid in the conquering of America. The English attacked Jamaica on May 10, 1655. The Spanish surrendered and......

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Culture Dimension and Gulf

...on some of Hofstede’s and Trompenaars’ Cultural Dimensions. You are also required to briefly analyze the UAE website of papa john’s, providing suggestions on how they can further localize their content for a Gulf audience. 1. Video Presentation and Supporting Document Each student will be required to create a 3-6 minute video presentation (mp4 or other suitable format). Each student MUST produce a video presentation. Failure to provide a video presentation will result in 0% for the ENTIRE individual element of this assessment. The video presentation must be accompanied by a supporting document, using the template provided (maximum word count 1,500 words excluding reference list, appendix etc.) In your video presentation/supporting document, you need to look at a Gulf/Bahraini audience in terms of the following cultural dimensions. Focus on everyday examples about how people socialize, do business, communicate, eat out etc. (a) Uncertainty Avoidance (Hofstede) (b) Collectivism/Individualism (Trompenaars and Hofstede) (c) Universalism/Particularism (Trompenaars) (d) Neutral/Affective (Trompenaars) (e) Look at the Papa John’s UAE website (http://www.papajohns.ae/pj/) and provide 3 relevant examples of how it needs to localize its web content for a Bahraini/Gulf audience. Link your suggestions briefly to your previous analysis. (Bahraini or gulf) Answer: -Part one: (Bases on my own experience) Hofstede’s and Trompenaars’ Cultural Dimensions: Text:......

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Hofstede’s Five Dimension Comparison of Germany and China

... Hofstede’s Five Dimension comparison of Germany and China Hofstede’s Five Dimensions Hofstede’s five dimensions are a useful tool to give someone an insight of different cultures. These elements give a country’s behaviour tendencies rather than an exact prescription. There are weaknesses to Hofstede’s Five Dimension theory as it may too easily encourage stereotyping. Even in countries as small as the UK, not all citizens are alike – e.g. it is argued that the culture in the North of England is quite different to the South. Hofstede has also been criticized for being too simplistic; however Hofstede’s theory does give us a general base to work from. 74 countries are listed on Hofstede’s website from which information can be drawn to make comparisons not only between countries but against the world average to give a broader picture. The following graph gives a comparison between Germany and China. It also allows for assessment against the Asian average and World average and our own British culture as benchmarks. Hofstede Comparison: UK, Germany, China Asian Average and World Average [pic] Comparison of Germany and China [pic] Power Distance Index Germany 35 LOW China 80 HIGH Individualism Germany 67 HIGH China 66 LOW Masculinity Germany 66 HIGH China 66 HIGH Uncertainty Avoidance Germany 65 HIGH China 30 LOW Long Term Orientation Germany 31LOW China 118 HIGH Power Distance Index – PDI Power Distance measures......

Words: 2764 - Pages: 12

Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions

...semester 2016, 11.06.2016 Table of Contents – Cultural Dimensions according to Hofstede 1. The psychologist Hofstede a) Geert Hofstede b) Gert-Jan Hofstede 2. The cultural dimensions a) Social Orientation - Individualism-Collectivism-Index (IDV) b) Power Orientation – Power-Distance-Index (PDI) c) Uncertainty Orientation – Uncertainty-Avoidance-Index (UAI) d) Goal Orientation – Masculinity-Femininity-Index (MAS) e) Time Orientation – Long-Time vs. Short-Time-Orientation-Index (LTO) 3. Examples – Germany, United States, Venezuela 4. Problems and Discrepancies 5. Conclusion 6. Bibliography 1 Cultural dimensions according to Geert Hofstede Classifying and comparing cultures is strongly connected with the name Geert Hofstede. The Dutch social psychologist, as he calls himself, was born in 1928 in Haarlem(Netherlands) as Gerard Hendrik Hofstede. He went to schools until 1945, that was when he completed the Diploma Gymnasium Beta. From 17 on until he was 25 years old, he studied Mechanical Engineering and ended it in 1953 with a Master’s Degree. After two years of military service he started working in managerial jobs until 1965. He completed his Ph.D. in Social Sciences in part time studies. Already during that time, from 1965 until 1971 he founded and managed the Personnel Research Department of IBM. In this time, he developed the theory of the Cultural Dimensions that are presented in this paper. He worked with 117.000......

Words: 2323 - Pages: 10