Nclb

In: Other Topics

Submitted By peggyg
Words 1161
Pages 5
No Child Left Behind Final Project C.M. 107-03 Peggy Graham

Education is the one resource everyone has that is theirs alone. It is also the one asset everyone has that can never be taken away from them. Does anybody believe that the United States government and politicians should be those holding the keys to our future generations’ quality of education? The future of any country of any nation depends directly upon the degree of cultural and educational development of younger generations. Besides, any education system needs constant control and upgrading to correspond to world standards and bring better results. This leads to discussing the Act of 2001, which received the name “No Child Left Behind” signed by President Bush at the beginning of the year 2002. NCLB is said to be “a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the central federal law in pre-collegiate education” (Mathis, 2003, pg. 679). The special aid program for disadvantaged students was the first to expand the ESEA. NCLB was formed in an answer to the reaction of public concern of education, with stricter guidelines for testing, and a stronger importance for highly qualified teachers’. Because of the public reaction about education the key aims of the “No Child Left Behind” Act is to improve as much as possible the situation in education and provide sufficient support for the disadvantaged students. The NCLB does not allow a single public school to be left out of this document.

The Act consists of several measures described, aiming at driving broad gains in students’ achievements and at making schools more accountable for the progress of their students (West & Peterson, 2003).…...

Similar Documents

No Child Left Behind

...No Child Left Behind Luisa Villalba EDU623 Professor Smith November 5, 2012 The No Child Left Behind act was put in place to help better educate America’s youth. The NCLB act shines light on our education system, and how our focus needs to be on educating our children. Explore what the NCLB act was intended to do its pros and cons, and President Obama’s fight to reform NCLB. In 2001 President George W. Bush proposed a federal law known as The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The law supports several federal programs intended to improve U.S. schools by raising the standards of responsibility for school districts, schools, and states. The law also allows room for parents to choose the schools they would like their children to attend. The NCLB act concentrates on increasing reading, and math sores nationwide. The objective of the NCLB act is that all students meet state guidelines set in hopes of students reaching their full academic potential. Funding for the NCLB act is divided into quite a few sections, or titles. For example * Title I, Part A focuses on obtaining resources for disadvantaged students. This is done by providing funding to bring qualified educators into the classroom. * Title 1, Part D ensures that children who are found to delinquent, or neglected receive quality education while in detention centers, or institutions. * Title II, Part A concentrates on bettering the quality of teachers, and principals. This......

Words: 1089 - Pages: 5

Nclb

... Abstract The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is a federal law that mandates a number of programs aimed at improving U.S. education in elementary, middle, and high school by increasing accountability standards. The aproach of NCLB is based on theories in education that high expectations and goal setting will result in greater educational achievement for most students. High standards for all students as well as educators are quality goals, however, using standardized tests to measure success is not the most effective method. Having high standards is a necessary part of our nation's success, it sets a high level of accountability and provides benchmarks for both the student and educators. Those schools that are categorized as performing poor are required to have supplemental asistance like tutoring, after school programs or even replacing teacher completely. Schools risk being restructured or even taken over by the state is after five years of not making adequate yearly progress. But standardized testing is an ineffective way of assessing individual student performance. This type of test gives reason to teach according to what is on the test, rather than for authentic learning. When using standardized tests there is no room to account for differennt learning styles and strengths of each student. Everyone learns differenntly but with this type of test doesn't allow for individuality. NCLB believes that boosting standardized tests scores should be the......

Words: 3103 - Pages: 13

Nclb

...involved with the way children learn, and I do not think it’s right. In 1965, the government got involved with the way children learn. The Elementary and Secondary Education act of 1965 is where it begins. Now this act was designed to help the United States schools to perform better and to see the flaws in teaching and the schools in general in every state. I, being a mother, see no problem with that. If it is to improve the way the teachers teach their student’s, I’m all for it. In 2001, this law was revised and a proposal was set forth on January 23rd 2001. No Child Left Behind was the new name, and it was signed into law on January 8th 2002. This new revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education act of 1965, now known as NCLB, is not helping our children at all. The act wants schools to meet a certain standard, which I think is impossible. Every child learns differently. All students across the U.S. in certain grades are given a basic skills test if their school receives federal funding. The standards are set for each individual state. To me, that is wrong. In all areas every child learns differently and the law makers do not take it into consideration. The main question I come across is: Does this system work? My personal opinion is no way, it doesn’t work for a second. All students take the same test with the same rules as the rest of the students. They leave out the children with disabilities. This is where I believe that all students are left behind. ......

Words: 1406 - Pages: 6

Nclb

...No Child Left Behind, Does it Work? Debra Roberson Ashford University No Child Left Behind In 2001, then President G.W. Bush introduced the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. The U.S. Congress, with bipartisan support, passed the act. The NCLB Act was brought about to combat the rising and devastating social divide within the educational system. “The law targeted early learning, measuring student performance, offering options to failing schools, and ensuring more resources for schools” (Dolgoff, 2009, p. 125). The 1965 Elementary and Second Education Act allotted funding for primary and secondary education. This act was put in place to make sure all children were given equal education and equal opportunities with their education. (The Santa Fe New Mexican, pp. 1- 2003, A.1.) The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is a reauthorization of the 1965 ESA. New standards were put in place that required schools to meet certain criteria or lose funding for their schools. The NCLB Act has 37 categories that each school must meet. There are also 10 specific guidelines for AYP, Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Ten Categories: The Adequate Yearly Progress allows the government to determine how a school is performing academically based on the results of the required standardized tests. The Department of Education guidelines for the AYP are: 1. A single statewide accountability system, which is applied to all public schools and local education......

Words: 1658 - Pages: 7

Nclb Cons

...Left Behind Cons The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) has been a controversial topic from its start. There are passionate debaters on both sides of the arguments, each with their own validity behind their stance. Last week was all about focusing on the pros NCLB brings to the table, now lets dive into the cons. What are the negative affects? According to "Educational Research Newsletter And Webinars" (2006), " By imposing standards on students’ minds we are, in effect, depriving them of their fundamental intellectual freedom by applying one standard set of knowledge. Standardized tests oversimplify knowledge and do not test higher-order thinking skills. State standards are externally imposed on local teachers.” and “One-size-fits-all standards either dumb down instruction to the lowest common denominator or condemn low-ability students to frequent failure” (Standard-based assessments). The point this brings up is a strong one. How can the educational system except to successfully teach all students using the exact same model when it’s a well-known fact everyone has vastly different learning styles. Metaphorically, trying to shove the square through the circle whole is going to always lead to failure. The idea of having a set standard that all children should know is obviously very important, but setting down a specific guideline all kids are supposed to form to via an annual standardized test doesn’t work. The "Nclb Stories From The Front Lines" (N.D.) website......

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Nclb

...the important and interesting subjects, because they are non -tested subjects, such as art, social studies, health and even music. The NCLB is causing problems because student’s who don’t meet these standard have to face a lot of consequences No child left behind act does more harm than good as it ruin funding for schooling and it also places too much attention on testing. For instance, school are place on different levels according to the percentage of students passing the standardized test that is given in the subject areas. Schools that don’t have a high percentage of students passing the examination are put on probationary status. These school are even forced to undergo review by the state over the next year and if they don’t improve in these subjects, they will be at risk of losing their accreditation. furthermore, school may reach the point where they have to be shut down or relocate students. Some of the teachers are going home late and not having enough time to go home and relax because they are providing tutoring to increase their student’s scores fearing that the state will take over or shut the school down completely. For example, according to Diane Ravitch a historian of education stated in her article “Time to kill no child left behind” explains the consequences teachers and students will face if they don’t meet the requirement in NCLB. She said that, school that don’t make progress towards 100% proficiency for every group are subject to increasingly, stringent,......

Words: 1784 - Pages: 8

Human Rights

...Warren C. Everett| October 23, 2014| Initial Findings| Human Rights PS 459 The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) was drafted into legislation in hopes of substantially tightening the achievement gap in public education. Deriving from a concern about the efficacy of public education in America, the NCLB is meant to improve education in general, especially for minority students and also for students who have special needs (Ermolaeva and Ross, 2010 p. 33). The legislation is a junction of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and also President Bush’s strategies, which include: “Increased accountability for results from states, school districts, and schools; greater choice for parents and students, particularly those in low-performing schools; more flexibility for states and local educational agencies in the use of federal funds; qualified teachers in their subject areas; stronger emphasis on reading and mathematics; and scientifically based education methods,” (Harrison 2010, 346). The legislation was met with generally positive reviews due to its emphasis to remedy many of the factors, which have for centuries plagued the public education system. Yet, in recent years, the act is a hot button topic in debates among scholars, educators and parents. The NCLB has been praised for its initiative to fix the public education system and its advocacy for underrepresented students. Rhode (2012) says, “ No Child Left Behind represented an episode of bounded......

Words: 997 - Pages: 4

Nclb

...Problem Solving GS1140 No Child Left Behind The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was originally called the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESES); it was debated in congress in 1964 and passed into law in 1966 by President L.B. Johnson. In 2001 president G.W. Bush revised the ESEA and called it the No Child Left Behind, and passed it into law in 2002. The NCLB was passed into law and is in effect in all fifty states in the U.S. NCLB requires all public schools receiving federal funding to administer a state wide standardize test annually to all students. This means all students must take the same test under the same conditions. The NCLB goal is to improve higher achievement in education for poor and minority students, also students with disability. In order for schools to receive federal funding states must test all students at selected grade levels. The requirements are grades 3 through 8 being tested every year in reading and math. Along with the testing there are other measures that the state holds the schools accountable for, annual testing is on by the 2005-06 school year, sate were required to begin testing students in grades 3-8 annually in reading and math. By 2007-08 students had to be tested in science at least once in elementary, middle and high school (www.edweek.org/ew/issues/no-child-left-behind/). Another is academic progress; each state creates their own academic standards for what a child should know and learn. The states are required to......

Words: 461 - Pages: 2

Aed 200 Week 7 Dq 1 and Dq 2

...and review the information on No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Review the section on NCLB from Chapter 5 in your textbook (p. 156-157). What are the implications of NCLB on teachers; on students in the classroom; and on schools and school districts? 3. Discussion Question 2 Post your response to the following: Standards-based education can sometimes put pressure on teachers to be sure they ‘measure-up’ to the expectations of state standards. How can teacher accountability have a positive and a negative influence on the classroom environment? Respond to classmates’ post from a parent perspective. AED 200 Week 7 DQ 1 and DQ 2 Get Tutorial by Clicking on the link below or Copy Paste Link in Your Browser http://hwguiders.com/downloads/aed-200-week-7-dq-1-dq-2/ For More Courses and Exams use this form ( http://hwguiders.com/contact-us/ ) Feel Free to Search your Class through Our Product Categories or From Our Search Bar (http://hwguiders.com/ ) Discussion Question 1 Resource: Review the No Child Left Behind section in Chapter 5(p.156-157) in Introduction to the foundations of American education (13th ed.). and go to the website http://www.schoolfunding.info/ Post your response to the following: Visit the website: http://www.schoolfunding.info/ and review the information on No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Review the section on NCLB from Chapter 5 in your textbook (p. 156-157). What are the implications of NCLB on teachers; on students in the classroom; and......

Words: 3409 - Pages: 14

Policy Paper

...public policy decision-making or dispute resolution, processes in which representation of all affected groups is desired. Stakeholders are the investors of the said company or organization and their opinions do matter. Any decisions, changes, or business matters that can affect the overall balance of the company stakeholders do have a say so and need to know. (NCLB) or No Child left behind act is becoming very popular where everyone has heard of it or will hear of it in some shape or form. The NCLB act of 2001 has changed its’ educational discourse in the United States. Terms such as “accountability,” “adequate yearly progress,” and “highly qualified” almost not even mentioned a decade ago have become more prevalent in the national vernacular. An accountability system driven by high expectations, ambitious deadlines, public reporting, and the threat of serious consequences for schools that fail to comply with the policy mandates, NCLB, the most recent reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965 (ESEA), has moved accountability for student performance to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness. Since NCLB was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002, there has been no shortage of literature and commentary on the topic. The ones really being affected are the children not getting the proper education by the teachers or schools and the parents that are trying to teach their kids but need the help from the schools. ......

Words: 1705 - Pages: 7

No Child Left Bihind

...we about to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? For the first time in more than a decade, Congress is moving forward on reauthorizing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act—known in its previous iteration as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Voices on both sides of the aisle have proposed major changes, including tossing the annual testing requirement for kids in grades 3 through 8, as well as repealing the accountability measures that have allowed the federal government to require states to address failing schools and yawning achievement gaps. There is no doubt that NCLB has problems that should be addressed in a new reauthorization. But before we throw out NCLB and rewind to the policies of the 1990s, we should examine what, if any, effect the era of accountability ushered in by President George W. Bush, late Senator Ted Kennedy (DMA), then-Congressman (now Speaker) John Boehner (R-OH), and retired Congressman George Miller (D-CA) has had on student achievement. As we outline below, even a cursory look at the data makes clear that after decades of stagnant scores, the last 15 years of accountability have brought measurable gains for students across the board, and the biggest gains during the NCLB era have been concentrated among the kids who needed them the most. While there are still serious problems to confront and inequities to overcome, for the first time in decades we are on a path towards addressing them. In fact, if another......

Words: 1932 - Pages: 8

The Gifted and Nclb

...Composition I December 10, 2009 The Gifted and No Child Left Behind As each year progresses, students are facing many more challenges and struggles. Sadly, most of these are faced in the classrooms with the emphasis on the children being adequate in their studies. To help relieve some of these troubles, former president George W. Bush passed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) on January 2, 2002. Congress created this act to bring all students up to a base level of knowledge needed to be deemed successful for federally mandated tests as stated in No Child Left Behind (Kanjorski 1426). These standardized tests assess students’ knowledge in mathematics, reading comprehension, writing conventions and now science. With focus being shifted to bringing students up to par, the students on the other end of the spectrum, the gifted, have lost the support and programs in which they thrive. Because of this, it can be stated that No Child Left Behind hinders the performance of gifted students. Linda Kenny, a reporter for School Administrator, a well-known periodical, states: “One of the great myths is the assumption that bright kids will make it on their own… But they do need support and they do need the focus.” The curriculums that these students strive on have been pushed to the wayside in many different ways. In a school in Kentucky, the “TREASURES (To Recruit, Educate, and Serve Under-Represented Exceptional Students) Approach” was abandoned. The main reason for......

Words: 2350 - Pages: 10

Nclb

...8 Things That Anonymous, The Hacker 'Terrorist' Group, Has Done For Good It's easy to think of the hacking group Anonymous as a group of punk troublemakers, raising hell online. Some have even debated whether their extra-legal protests should be labeled terrorist acts. But that would overlook some of the genuinely good deeds the group — whose members identify themselves with the Vendetta mask — has done. Whether it's retaliating against kiddie porn sites, helping to identify Chinese military cyber-attacks, or targeting the digital properties of various hate groups, Anonymous can sometimes be a force for good. 8. In December 2006, Anonymous took down the website of white supremacist radio show host Hal Turner. The attack ended up with Turner paying some very expensive bandwidth bills and dropping a lawsuit a year later. 7. Beginning in January 2008, Anonymous kicked off "Project Chanology," its attack on the Church of Scientology, a cult-like religion which allegedly imprisons its dissident members. They launched denial of service attacks against the organization's websites, gamed the link-sharing site Digg to more prominently display anti-Scientology pages, and even physically protested — showing up in person — many church events. 6. Anonymous released user information from a major hacking forum in February 2011, and security firm Mandiant was able to use this data to link the Chinese military to cyber-attacks against the U.S. this year. 5. The Westboro......

Words: 418 - Pages: 2

Students Are Falling Behind

...it’s Time to Replace No Child Left Behind” in Time Magazine, Kayla Webley reports on the difficulties schools across the nation are going through because of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The article goes more in depth and explains the core issues with the NCLB and why it backfired the second they signed it. As Fair Fax county superintendent Jack dales says about the law, “It’s become meaningless” (Webley 42). As the law continues to conduct mayhem across the nation’s schools, more and more students are becoming slaves to the tests and are lacking basic academic skills. The article shows convincingly that NCLB is not working and needs to be restructured. However, I feel the NCLB can have a long lasting impact on the schools if the government would allow more flexibility in the classroom, and implement a rigorous schedule for the students. The high standards and narrow curriculum are taking away the creativity of the teachers’ lesson plans, but the creativity of the lesson plans is just one of the solutions the NCLB really needs. First of all, the NCLB focuses mainly on what is on the tests and lacks contextual creativity in the teacher’s lesson plans. NCLB needs to allow more flexibility in the classrooms so that teachers are able to teach at a higher rate. Webley explains that “NCLB has sucked the creativity out of their lesson plans, forcing them to narrow their curriculums and teach only those concepts that will be on the state tests” (44). The government......

Words: 743 - Pages: 3

Special Education and the Principles of Nclb

...Special Education and the Principles of NCLB Rebecca Foster AED/222 October 30, 2011 Paula Alysha Glover Special Education and the Principles of NCLB The No Child Left behind Act, (NCLB 2001), was designed to raise the standard for education in the United States. This act has five core principles that have been the foundation of the NCLB act which have each had pros and cons. States are responsible for being accountable for goal setting as well as for showing improvement of test results. The pros of this principle are that states have the authority to set their own goals, which is good because states have a better understanding of their population and their social economic factors that may affect test scores. The cons of states being responsible for their standards is that they have the ability to set their goals low to make it appear as though they are achieving better scores. Another problem with this is due to the varying local social and economic differences test scores may not be reflected fairly. Teachers are pressured to teach their students how to do well on the standardized testing instead of teaching for students to learn. The testing is also unfair because of the students with disabilities, students are discriminated upon because the state is able to make one percent of their students exempt to make up for these types of students. The NCLB act allows states and local officials to have greater flexibility when allocating where funds should go within......

Words: 772 - Pages: 4