Organisational Change

In: Business and Management

Submitted By shamika01
Words 3667
Pages 15
IMPLEMENTING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AT PLANET AIR TRAVEL

Introduction

Organizational change is occurring every day and everywhere; it is a natural process that is essential for organizational development. Change occurs when companies transit from their current state to their desired future state. Change is imperative in today’s chaotic business environment due to constant in customer expectations, unpredictable economy, the emergence of new market and technological advancements. Internal and external drivers of change have an impact on the nature of organizational changes; therefore, in order to secure Planet Air Travel (PAT) future there was a need to undergo reactive and transformational changes along with emergent changes. However, employees react differently to change due to their perception of the change. At PAT employees will have various reactions throughout the change process, which is explained using Carnell (2003) coping cycle.Successful implementation of change is not an easy task, therefore; Kotter’s(1995 in Hayes 2010) eight-step model is a useful framework for successfully executing and implementing PAT vision.

Organization Context

Organization context is considered as "the ecology of the organization," which, consist of activities that occuroutside an organization's boundaries as well as those that are unique to the organization (Hahn, 2010). It is determined both bythe internal and external environment.
The internal context at PAT is the internal environment under its control, which enables the company to achieve its main goals and objectives. It includes the comprehensive end-to-end services offered at PAT, its coercive culture, values and beliefs, its relationship with the employees, its structure and organization principle, assets and its resources including Human Resource and technologies. It is anything within the organization that may…...

Similar Documents

Resistance to Organisational Change

...RESISTANCE TO ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE Introduction Resistance is a common reason for the failure of change initiatives. The subject is thus of extreme importance to management. This paper explores the contention by King and Anderson that a common theme in defining resistance is “a naïve and managerialist assumption that resistance is counter-productive – even irrational – behaviour which needs to be overcome” with an emphasis on organisational change. It begins by looking at organisational change and its managerialist perspective and then examines resistance in an organisational setting. It ends with suggestions on how resistance to change should be managed by organisations. What is organisational change? Organisational change can be described as the transformation of an organisation from a current state to another, desired state. In all definitions of change there is the emphasis on the alteration from one state to another (Goodman and Kurke 1982). This process can be either structured or unstructured and can be either incremental (an improvement on an existing state) or transformational (a total transformation to another state). Organisations themselves have been defined as “social arrangements for the controlled performance of collective goals” (Huczynski and Buchanan 1991) and Rogers (1962) defines change as an alteration in the structure and function of a social system. While no consensus exists as to why organisations change (Hughes 2010), it is generally......

Words: 3670 - Pages: 15

Organisational Behaviour - Managing Organisational Change

...ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR - Managing Organisational Change Essay Topic: One set of authors state that “An organisation’s ability to manage change will have a significant effect on its performance and prosperity” (Graetz. F., et al, 2006, p2 in Grates F. et al, 2006, Managing Organisational Change, John Wiley & Sons, Australia), whereas another author claims that few corporate change efforts have ever been successful (Kotter, J.P., 2005, ‘Why Transformational Change Efforts Fail’, Harvard Business Review, March-April 1995, pp 59-67). Discuss these two statements and build an argument that explains this apparent contradiction with regard to relevant organizational behavioural theory. In my opinion, the statements presented above do not contradict one another, in fact the two statements presented support the need for successful organizational change and the need for concerted effort in implementing the change. In almost every case, the basic goal has been has been the same: to make fundamental changes in how business is conducted in order to help cope with a new, more challenging market environment. Change is an organizational need, at one time or other and management needs rigorous support in achieving positive change outcomes. I want to look in detail the change management theory and practice including Transformational Change, The Tools and Techniques used for Change Management, Transforming Organisations for Organic Growth, Cultural Revitalisation and Behavioural......

Words: 3599 - Pages: 15

Effect of Organisational Change

...Advantages and disadvantages of organisational change Organisational change is usually good for any organisation because it can bring the fresh idea for the organisation. However, it also can be a challenge in any organisation if the strategy is not implemented properly. It will bring either the positive or negative effect to any organisation if use the change. Next we will discuss some advantages and disadvantages that can affect an organization. 6.1 Advantages of organisational change 6.1.1 Improved organisational performance The first advantage is improved organisational performance. (D’Netto et al, 2000) It can help the organisation to perform better. It may become higher productivity through use the advance in technology, training and other else. Besides that, the employees have more knowledge and pool of information about how to use machine or efficient use of the resources. For the example, the Toyota Company implement a concept which is JIT (Just in Time) to reduce the cost and promote the benefit of product (Likert, 2004). It is also the oldest and first way by Toyota and still uses it now. After that, Toyota add automation concept into management. They realize that Toyota way is also the most important change in Toyota’s management. So, they implement TPS which is Toyota Production System become philosophy of production management. 6.1.2 Flexibility The second advantage is flexibility (Mullins, 2010). That is because change can be implemented without......

Words: 316 - Pages: 2

Organisational Culture and Change

...Culture within an organisational context is a widely explored paradigm. It's nature and mottled definitions have formed the basis of organisational study for many decades. From Handy's cultural forms in the notorious "Gods of Management"3, to the Morganest metaphoric representations of the concept such as, culture as a web, an onion, or an iceberg6. Therefore, the contents of culture encompasses a wide range of organisational phenomena including surface features such as values and forms of expression: preconscious factors such as symbols and norms: and deep structures such as basic assumptions and worldviews (Pettigrew 1979; Frost et al 1985)7. They all imply that culture is an integral part of organisations, that without due consideration, development of strategy will ultimately lead to failure, leading to the assumption that culture should always fit with organisational strategy. Revenaugh2 suggests that most researchers assume that corporate culture is an important consideration for understanding and effectively managing organisations, and thus supports that argument. Bringing me to the purpose of this essay, which is to explore the context of organisational culture in more depth and come to a more discernable conclusion about its relationship with strategic management. As a result of its wide and varying definitions, corporate culture can be hard to define, measure or manage; these definitions reveal culture to be a complex concept that involves many factors as......

Words: 1877 - Pages: 8

Advantages and Disadvantages of Organisational Change

...Advantages and disadvantages of organisational change Change Might Not Equal Progress Many companies emphasize a culture of continuous improvement. While never being satisfied with the status quo can drive excellence in your organization, there is some wisdom in the old adage, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Mistaking change for progress is similar to the common problem of mistaking activity for productivity. Every organization can be improved, no matter how well it is performing, but a manager should always ask the question, "How is this proposed change going to improve my organization's ability to achieve our key goals?" Cost-to-Benefit Ratio Change is never free. Changing the oil in your car takes time and materials, which cost money. Changing the phone system in your building costs time, money and training. Every change also has opportunity cost; spending your equipment budget on new computers means you have to wait to upgrade the phones. And there are intangible costs such as morale and customer satisfaction during the adjustment period. Determine whether the cost of a change is outweighed by the benefit that change will create. Internal Resistance According to an article by organizational change expert Garrison Wynn, the top two reasons people resist change are lack of knowledge about coming changes and fear of the unknown. You can expect some level of resistance to any change, no matter how small or how much benefit it might promise. The key tools for......

Words: 397 - Pages: 2

Organisational Change

...| How and why change models can facilitate change within organizations | | | | XXXXXX – 11XXXXXXX – Word Count: 1375HR388 - Human Resource Management & Organizational Change 21/1/15 | | How and why change models can facilitate change within organizations | | | | XXXXXX – 11XXXXXXX – Word Count: 1375HR388 - Human Resource Management & Organizational Change 21/1/15 | Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Change models & their effectiveness to Human Resource Management and Organisational Change 3 2.1. Stage 1: Unfreeze 4 2.2. Stage 2: Transition 6 2.3. Stage 3: Refreeze 7 3. Conclusion & Recommendation 7 4. References 8 1. Introduction To begin with an in depth explanation and definition of organisational change, it a process that has been developed over the years in terms of discovering the best techniques to implement at different stages of a company’s life; an important issue that every firm must constantly adopt in order to maintain competitiveness and efficiency. As a result of the ongoing external changes in its environment, whether at the strategic or operational level, companies must act accordingly in response to changes in taste, a crisis or whether the change was triggered by a leader within the organisation with motives to improve efficiency (Moran and Brightman, 2001: 111; Burnes, 2004; Hayes 2014). Change models are used as a means of making the necessary changes to an organisation’s development as......

Words: 1764 - Pages: 8

Effect of Organisational Change on Employees

...Organisational Commitment Richard McBain (2005) looks to define organisational commitment and concludes that although there is “no single definition of commitment”, he refers to Allen & Meyer’s (1990) three-component model and offers an explanation of those terms: 1. Affective commitment, “which refers to employees’ emotional attachment to, identification with, and involvement in, the organization” 2. Normative commitment, “which is based on feelings of loyalty and obligation” 3. ‘Continuance’ component “refers to the commitment based on the costs that employees associate with leaving the organization” Richard McBain (2005) also explores Swailes (2002) argument that measures of organisation commitment often seem to focus on the reasons for commitment, or its outcomes, rather than on the commitment itself. He also goes on to explore the research by Malhotra and Mukherjee (2003) where they test the importance of job satisfaction and organisational commitment on service quality and explore how commitment may influence the willingness of customer-contact employees to engage in discretionary efforts may reflect in the service quality they deliver. He goes on to comment on one of the key findings from Malhotra and Mukherje (2003) research; that affective commitment was more important than job satisfaction in determining the service quality of customer contact employees. Richard McBain (2005) goes on to conclude that “Service organisations should, therefore, strive to......

Words: 2182 - Pages: 9

Introduction to Organisational Change

...WEEK 1 – INTRODUCTION TO ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE Organisational change is an organisation’s response in process to external environmental changes. The pendulum of change: organisations will be at various stages, but desire to be on the OD side Organisational Focus vs. Organisational Transformational Focus OD – planned, long term, internal focus (strengthening the company for the future) (evolutionary) OT – unplanned, short term, reactive, external focus (revolutionary) Planned vs. Unplanned Planned change: an organisation’s ability to anticipate and respond to change (implementing new technologies) Unplanned change: organisations have limited time to respond and anticipate change (emerges as a response to unanticipated threat or event) Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary Evolutionary change: Slow, incremental but stable, change individual parts or departments, improve existing products Revolutionary: Fast, massive and establishes new equilibrium, transform entire organisation, new structure/management, introduce new products (Apple created a new smart phone in response to NOKIA, due to Steve Jobs). 1st order and 2nd order change First Order: incremental/episodic, adjustment in systems, changes maintains & develops Second Order: discontinuous, transformational, radical change that fundamentally alters the organisation (Revolutionary) Type of Organisational Change 1. Tuning: Incremental 1st order) 2. Adaptation: Incremental, reactive 3.......

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Organisational Change

...ANECDOTE WHITEPAPER Three journeys: A narrative approach to successful organisational change INTRODUCTION Early on in Anecdote, we did a trainingneeds assessment for part of the Australian Defence Force. Our discovery phase involved two teams; one team adopted a structured interview technique and the other used anecdote circles to collect stories. After our first day in the field we met with the structured interview guys to compare notes. “On first blush,” they said, “it seems like most things are in order. They are adhering to OH&S processes. Sure, there are some areas for improvement but generally things are OK.” As they were providing this assessment, those of us on the anecdotes team just looked at each other in astonishment and replied, “So, you didn’t hear about the soldiers who are showering in their own urine because their recycling system is broken or hear about the workshop where everyone wears protective footwear because some poor fellow lost his toes in an accident but no one wears protective eyewear because they have never had an eye accident?”. We had heard story upon story of major transgressions that weren’t picked up in the structured interview approach. This experience confirmed our assessment that a narrative approach is great for yielding new, and otherwise hidden, insights. A number of years and many clients later, we have seen that there is something even more important narrative techniques provide: a resolve among people to do something about the......

Words: 3800 - Pages: 16

Organisational Change

...was through a change methodology management plan. Systematically, the company began reducing its workforce. But, before this was done, through his change management leadership, the chairman gave the company the reasons for the restructuring and privatization of the company in order to prepare them for the upcoming change. Thus, through leadership and communication, he directed his company through a difficult time that could have been disastrous without effective change management resistance communication Organisational Change Sample Paper Abstract An organization that has great strategies but does not have a culture that can allow it to put the strategy into action seizes to be a prosperous organization. The purpose of this paper is to look into how organizational culture influences success in change strategies. The paper will expound on what a culture in an organization is and explain the impacts of a company with a solid culture and one with a weaker culture on change. Introduction Organizational culture has various definitions according to different scholars. A company should change just as the environment does. That is according to management literature. In the course of globalization and internationalization, there came up technological advancements and the growth of scarcity of resources. The companies and organizations therefore escalate towards rivalry against each other (Alvessonl & Sveningsson, 2007). This therefore triggers the desire for change in an......

Words: 2042 - Pages: 9

Organisational Change

...management Module: HRM 3008 –Organisational Change HRM1 2015-2016 January Cohort Group 5 Title-INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO Student name and Number -Anthony Arhin LON160108010 Lecturer: Samtai Rai Teacher: Simon Taylor Introduction According to many theorist’s, change is needed for an organisation to thrive. Most organisations operating today are successful because of change. This essay will examine the theories and concepts needed in for successful change. Reflective learning means improving performance by using the outcome of reflection to inform the future practice. Portfolio 1 Question  1) Does leadership have a role to play in change management? 2) Discuss the concept of servant leadership for initiating and implementing change in organisations.  Leadership plays an essential part in the change management process. Therefore, leaders have got to pay attention to leveraging. Getting the right people to inspire, encourage, motivate as well as having the ability to understand peoples emotional mind state. The Leaders is the key figure in the organisation for defining the need to change from internal and external drivers Carnell, (2003) says the people leading change can come from various......

Words: 2372 - Pages: 10

Organisational Change

...(1.0) Introduction. Managing organisational change one believes is like running a household. There is going to be the members of the family who will resist the change and those who will embrace the change. It is said that managing organisational change involves processes and tools for managing the people within the organisational. It was necessary for Corus to have change management employed as there was the need for becoming more competitive and to reduce or even close the gaps between European competitors and themselves. This deemed to be the main reason behind Corus’s change. However, as you read along one goes in to more debt on organisational change and managing organisational change. (2.1) Why organisations change? When it comes to organizational change there are two main categories by which change transpire. These are internal reasons for change and external reasons for change. (1.1.1) Internal reasons for change. Internal triggers can often be seen as changes in response to influences in the organization’s environment. Table (1) Showing Internal Triggers of Change. Formation or disbandment of a labour union inside the company | Appointment of a new CEO or other top executive | Changing the administrative structures | Job redesign affecting many employees | Factory redesign or office layout | New IT equipment | New marketing strategy | Outsourcing | Layoffs | More resources to research and development department | ...

Words: 2558 - Pages: 11

Organisational Change Process

...Organizational and personal change management, process, plans, change management and business development tips Here are some rules for effective management of change. Managing organizational change will be more successful if you apply these simple principles. Achieving personal change will be more successful too if you use the same approach where relevant. Change management entails thoughtful planning and sensitive implementation, and above all, consultation with, and involvement of, the people affected by the changes. If you force change on people normally problems arise. Change must be realistic, achievable and measurable. These aspects are especially relevant to managing personal change. Before starting organizational change, ask yourself: What do we want to achieve with this change, why, and how will we know that the change has been achieved? Who is affected by this change, and how will they react to it? How much of this change can we achieve ourselves, and what parts of the change do we need help with? These aspects also relate strongly to the management of personal as well as organizational change. See also the modern principles which underpin successful change. Refer also to Psychological Contract theory, which helps explain the complex relationship between an organization and its employees. Do not 'sell' change to people as a way of accelerating 'agreement' and implementation. 'Selling' change to people is not a sustainable strategy for success, unless......

Words: 1373 - Pages: 6

Organisational Change

...Cambio consultants The most common obstacle to successful change is human resistance. Often people’s first reaction to the prospect of using a new business application, reporting to a new manager, or doing their work in a new way is to resist it. Anticipating potential resistance, assessing its threat to your change, and figuring out how to reduce the resistance is what change management is all about.  The problem for business management is that change is rarely optional, The choice is not whether to change, but: * Deciding what change is appropriate and necessary * How quickly it needs to be achieved * How resistance can be overcome and the organisation mobilised to complete the change Types of change Radical Incremental change Transitional Transformational Emergent Incremental change - Viewed as a process whereby individual elements of the organization address specific internal and external problems, as they arise, in a piecemeal fashion, which over time results in organisational transformation (Hedburge, 1976) * Ongoing piecemeal change which takes place as part of an organization’s evolution and development * Tends to more inclusive The disadvantages of such an incremental approach include avoiding structural, system-wide problems, and assume existing processes need modest improvement. In addition, using incremental approaches can be frustrating to employees and management if (pick a buzzword) does not catch on in the organization.......

Words: 959 - Pages: 4

Effect of Organisational Change

...Advantages and disadvantages of organisational change Organisational change is usually good for any organisation because it can bring the fresh idea for the organisation. However, it also can be a challenge in any organisation if the strategy is not implemented properly. It will bring either the positive or negative effect to any organisation if use the change. Next we will discuss some advantages and disadvantages that can affect an organization. 6.1 Advantages of organisational change 6.1.1 Improved organisational performance The first advantage is improved organisational performance. (D’Netto et al, 2000) It can help the organisation to perform better. It may become higher productivity through use the advance in technology, training and other else. Besides that, the employees have more knowledge and pool of information about how to use machine or efficient use of the resources. For the example, the Toyota Company implement a concept which is JIT (Just in Time) to reduce the cost and promote the benefit of product (Likert, 2004). It is also the oldest and first way by Toyota and still uses it now. After that, Toyota add automation concept into management. They realize that Toyota way is also the most important change in Toyota’s management. So, they implement TPS which is Toyota Production System become philosophy of production management. 6.1.2 Flexibility The second advantage is flexibility (Mullins, 2010). That is because change can be implemented without......

Words: 786 - Pages: 4