Pepsi Co

In: Business and Management

Submitted By jayboy28
Words 336
Pages 2
pPepsiCo, Inc 2005 Current Ratio= 10,454 (Current Assets) = 1.11% 9,406 (Current Liabilities)
Current Ratio= 8,639 (Current Assets) 1.28%
6752 (Current Liabilities) Vertical Analysis- 2005 1,716 (Cash, and Cash Equivalent) 0.054 or 5.4%
3,1727 (Total Assets)

Vertical Analysis- 2004
1,280 (Cash and Cash Equivalent) = 0.046 or 4.6% 27,987 (Total Assets)

Horizontal Analysis- 2005 2005 total current assets=10454 (8639 (total current assets 2004) = 1.2101 or 21%

Horizontal Analysis- 2004
2005 total current liabilities = 9404 (6752 total current liabilities 2004 = 1.393 or 39%. These shows with the company obtaining more liabilities with an increase of 39% and an increase to its assets by 21%, the results were good.

Coca Cola Company 2005 Current Ratio= 10,250 (Current Assets) 9,836(Current Liabilities) = 1.04 % 2004 Current Ratio= 12,281 (Current Assets) 11,133(Current Liabilities) = 1.10 % Vertical Analysis- 2005 4,701(Cash, and Cash Equivalent) 0.1598 or 1.6 % 29,427(Total Assets)

Vertical Analysis- 2004
6,707(Cash and Cash Equivalent)= 0.2133 or 2.1 % 31,441(Total Assets)

Horizontal Analysis- 2005 2005 total current assets=10250
2004 total current assets= 12281

Three commonly used tools of financial system analysis are the horizontal analysis, the vertical analysis, and the ratio analysis. The horizontal analysis is a technique used for evaluating financial statement data over a…...

Similar Documents

Coca-Cola vs Pepsi Co.

...compensation levels” percentage used to compute pension information for December 21, 2007 is 4.7%. 3. Determine which company you would rather invest in if you were a potential shareholder. Justify your answer. Coca Cola is a large company that was introduced in 1886 and their primarily marketing and selling products are carbonated soft drinks. They have a 63.9% gross profit margin for 2007 and show realistically good ratios indicating stability. About 74% of their net operating revenue comes from operations outside of the U.S. PepsiCo, Inc. is a large company as well that has been around since 1898. They are also a leader in the soft drinks market but have expanded and extended their business into another area very broad, snacks. Pepsi acquired Frito-Lay in 1965 and the group include Fritos, Doritos, Ruffles, Cheetos, Rold Gold pretzels, and Sun Chips just to mention a few of their main brand names with a remarkable variety. They also reveal stability and liquidity with good ratios. They have a 53.15% gross profit margin for 2007 and less than 40% of their net operating revenue comes from operations outside the U.S. Both are very promising, established, and profitable companies and I know with both it will be a good investment decision as a shareholder. If I was an investor I would choose PepsiCo, Inc. to invest, because of their diversity on markets and the shareholder returns are much more attractive and interesting. 4. Determine which company you would......

Words: 1073 - Pages: 5

Pepsi Co Acquisition

...Case Analysis for Pepsi Co Acquisition - More high level analysis (by beverages and food) we are in consumer packaged beverage and snack business Identify • Vision • Mission - Market leader in every industry they compete in - Synergies (transferring, management, HR skills, distribution channels – i.e. Power of One) - Market expansion (international) - Related diversification (share some of the same channels, advertising, distribution, etc) - There was no clear cut vision ( analysts and CEO even admitted it (looked like they were taking advantages of long term and short term opportunities) - Why do you have a portfolio of businesses? Maximize shareholder value ( would be one of the main drawbacks - Would buy current companies that will help piggy bank on their current success (i.e. restaurants and distribution channels) - Portfolio management – do they sell things off at the right time Identify Strategic Objectives (Are these objectives SMART) • Financial o Growth sale by certain percentage o Stock price o Cash • Non-Financial o Efficiency o International market Identify Current Business Strategy • Does It Make Sense? Why? Evaluate 1. Industry • Five Forces – Look at the industry today (*implication to the industry) Rivalry - Big companies manage to find niche and expand it - Little guys usually get bought out......

Words: 1542 - Pages: 7

Pepsi Co

...reformulations to make snack foods and beverages less unhealthy. Their belief that its efforts to develop “good-for-you” or “better-for-you” products would create growth opportunities from the intersection of business and public interests. The company was organized into four business divisions which all followed the corporation’s general strategic approach. Frito-Lay North America manufactured, marketed, and distributed such snack foods as Lay potato chips, Doritos tortilla chips, Cheetos cheese snacks, Fritos corn chips, Quaker Chewy granola bars, Grandma’s cookies, and Smartfood popcorn. The PepsiCo Beverages North America beverage manufactured, marketed, and sold beverage concentrates, fountain syrups, and finished goods under such brands as Pepsi, Gatorade, Tropicana, Lipton, Dole, and SoBe. PepsiCo International manufactured, marketed, and sold snacks and beverages in approximately 200 countries outside the United States. Quaker Foods North America manufactured and marketed cereals, rice, pasta dishes, and other food items that were sold in super markets....

Words: 256 - Pages: 2

Pepsi Co Case Study

...Pepsi Co With the assumptions given in the case, we estimated the WACC to be 12.23%. The cost of equity represented in the WACC was calculated using the geometric mean return on T-bonds and the long-term government bond rate (4.5%) as the appropriate risk free rate. We chose this over the arithmetic mean return using T-bills under the assumption that the geometric mean is more appropriate to use in estimating the expected return over longer time horizons, especially because as we go towards longer time horizon returns become more serially correlated. The difference in our estimated WACC from the 11% estimated could be attributed to the choice between arithmetic or geometric risk premiums and the short term/long-term risk free rates. (See exhibit 1) Since PepsiCo is comprised of three different business segment, we felt that it was in our best interest to calculate the cost of capital for each of the segments in order to achieve the appropriate WACC. We calculated the new WACCs via pure play method and used comparable companies for references (See Exhibit 2 for divisional segments). In order to use the pure play method, we averaged the betas, debt-equity ratios, and tax rates for all the related companies in each segment. We unlevered the betas and re-levered it to PepsiCo’s specifications. We arrived with the betas of .85, .83, and 1.19 for restaurants, snack foods, and soft drinks respectively. In the end we estimated 12.17%, 13.15%, and 15.74% as our new WACCs for the......

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Pepsi Co

...organisational mission and objectives. The organisation reorganised their structure to a multidivisional structure in a move to exploit the full acquisition potential. A multidivisional structure is most suitable for an organisation that has not got a wide range of products like PepsiCo. The organisation did not experience benefits from the multidivisional structure because PepsiCo had a wide rage of products and different customers. The organisation was structured into divisions and each reporting to the headquarters and there was no synergies and economies of scale gained. PepsiCo revised the organisational structure to a matrix structure. It enabled the organisation to operate in its particular competitive situation at peak effectiveness. At Pepsi they discovered that it was essential to drive the various brands as part of one team. There was less conflict between employees because of the hierarchical setup of the organisation. PepsiCo Beverages became the No 1 liquid refreshment beverage company in measured channels. There was a strategic fit as its strengths in the growing non-carbonated drinks market could be exploited and PepsiCo became the market leader in the total soft drink market. QUESTION 1 Why was PepsiCo essentially organised into North American and international divisions? Why were there some variations in this structure? Examining the organisation structures outlined in this chapter, in which category would you put PepsiCo? Organisations in every......

Words: 2510 - Pages: 11

Pepsi Co.

... 3.6 Europe 6 3.7 Asia, Middle East and Africa 7 4.0 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE 7 4.1 STRATEGIES 7 4.2 Supply Chain of PepsiCo. And Supply Chain Strategy 8 4.3 Supply Chain Planning 8 4.4 Supply Chain Operation 8 4.5 Process Views of a Supply Chain 8 4.6 Competitive Advantage to PepsiCo. 9 4.7 Distribution Channels 9 4.8 Customers 10 4.9 Competition 11 5.0 Financial Performance 11 5.1 2013 13 5.2 2012 14 6.0 Corporate Governance 16 7.0 Conclusion 16 1.0 Company profile Pepsi co. Inc. was established through the merger of Pepsi cola. Pepsi cola was created in the late 1890s by Caleb brad ham, a New Bern, N.C. pharmacist. Frito-Lay, Inc. was formed by the 1961 merger of the Frito Company, founded by Elmer doling in 1932, and the H.W. lay company, founded by Herman W. lay, also in 1932. Herman lay, former chairman and CEO of Frito-Lay, was chairman of the boards of directors of the new company; Donald M. Kendall, former president and CEO of Pepsi cola, was president and chief executive officer. PepsiCo, Inc. was in corporate in Delaware in 1919 and was reincorporated in North Carolina in 1986. When used in this report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “PepsiCo” and the “Company” mean PepsiCo, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. They are a leading global food and beverage company with brands that are respected household names throughout the world. Through their operations, authorized bottlers, contract manufacturers and other third parties, they......

Words: 3662 - Pages: 15

Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi Co

...Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi Co 2 1. Using the current ratio, discuss what conclusions you can make about each company’s ability to pay current liabilities (debt). The current ratio measures the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations with its short term assets. Between Coca Cola and PepsiCo, PepsiCo has a higher current ratio implying that is more capable of paying its obligations. The debt management policies of Coca-Cola in conjunction with share repurchase program and investment activity resulted in current liabilities exceeding current assets. From the ratio Pepsi Co suddenly had to pay all its short-term creditors, it would be able to do so and have a surplus of 44% of current assets. If Coca-Cola had to pay all its short-term obligations, it would have only 13% surplus of current assets after fully repaying all short term obligations. Therefore, it can be said that PepsiCo is more liquid than Coca Cola based on its current ratio. | Coca-Cola | Pepsi Co. | Current Ratio | 1.13 | 1.44 |   2. Using the profitability ratios, discuss what conclusions you can make about each company’s profits over the past three years. The return on assets ratio is an indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. Pepsi Co’s return on assets ratio is 14.92, slightly higher than the industry’s Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi Co ......

Words: 1054 - Pages: 5

Pepsi Co

...Background The beverage that became known as Pepsi Cola was invented by a pharmacist, Caleb Bradham in New Bern, North Carolina in 1893 (seven years after Coca-Cola was invented in Atlanta Georgia). The name Pepsi Cola was chosen after the kola nut extract in the recipe, and after the pepsin enzyme which aids digestion because Bradham believed his new drink had positive digestive properties, even though the recipe didn’t contain any pepsin. The Pepsi Cola Company was incorporated in 1092. Meanwhile, the the Frito Company was founded by Elmer Doolin in 1932, and the H. W. Lay Company, was founded by Herman W.Lay in that same year. Those two companies merged into the Frito-Lay company in 1961. When the Pepsi Cola company merged with the Frito-Lay company in 1965, PepsiCo Inc. was born. PepsiCo Company International Headquarters: The PepsiCo company headquarters are located in Purchase, NY. PepsiCo Company Mission Statement, Vision, and Purpose: The mission of the PepsiCo focuses on products and performance primarily, with a few values thrown in for good measure. The mission statement of the PepsiCo Company is: "Our mission is to be the world's premier consumer products company focused on convenient foods and beverages. We seek to produce financial rewards to investors as we provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to our employees, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty,......

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Pepsi Co

... Position Title: Project & Utilities Manager Dept: Operations Reporting To: Operations Director Role: Manage multiple projects within approved budgets and completion of projects within set timelines. Accountabilities: Simultaneous and multiple project leadership Obtain quotations and write Capex applications for all projects. Negotiation and authorized signatory of contracts involving purchasing/procurement, order placement, tracking and invoice processing for payment. Budget management to ensure all targets are achieved for capital, expense, asset write off and accruals. Compilation of feasibility studies, capital expenditure proposals and financial justifications of projects in conjunction with site requirements. Co-ordination of in-house project teams comprising all stakeholders as applicable. Design, research and technical development of equipment, in conjunction with suppliers, R&D and Central Engineering/MOS. Manage projects and contractors to ensure compliance with Occupational Health and Safety act and AIB regulations. Daily contact with superior/peers Guiding team in daily and weekly decision making and prioritizing Manages his own department expenses including headcount. Measures Actual vs. Plan vs. Y ago Project Deadlines Project related KPI’s Skills: Graduate engineer with a degree in electrical or mechanical engineering Minimum 3 years projects experience in the FMCG environment and 2 years managerial......

Words: 4896 - Pages: 20

Pepsi Co and beverage industry. PepsiCo merged with Pepsi and is the parent company that owns a variety of other companies such as, Frito Lay, Quakers, and ocean spray just to name a few. Pepsi alone is considered to be in the soft drink industry. (The PBG Inc. 2013). In accordance to Kpmg LLP, PepsiCo's operations are organized into four business units: PepsiCo Americas Foods (PAF), PepsiCo Americas Beverages (PAB), PepsiCo Europe, and PepsiCo Asia, Middle East and Africa (AMEA). These four business units comprise six reportable segments: Frito-Lay North America (FLNA), Quaker Foods North America (QFNA), Latin America Foods (LAF), PAB, Europe, and AMEA. Pepsico is in 200 countries. Prior to their merger in February 2010, PepsiAmericas (PAS) and Pepsi Bottling Group (PBG), the two North American bottling units of PepsiCo, operated as the company's independent bottling subsidiaries. They were the major distributors of the finish goods. Since the merger, PAS and PBG are operating as a unit of Pepsi Beverages Company (PBC). PBC operates in the US, Canada and Mexico and encompasses approximately three-fourths of PepsiCo's North American beverage volume.(Kpmg 1). Other than producing, marketing and selling PepsiCo's global beverage brands, the PBC also manufactures and distributes third-party brands in key local markets such as Dr Pepper, Crush, Rock Star and Muscle Milk. In lieu of having a core focus on Pepsico, we will focus on Pepsi, its narrow subsidiary. Market definition......

Words: 5098 - Pages: 21

Pepsi Co

...product companies in the world and it is also one of the most famous soft drink companies. Currently PepsiCo owns more than 21% share of soft drink market world wide and has over 30% share in United states alone. Pepsi has many brands in soft drinks alone namely mountain dew, diet pepsi, mirinda etc. Also pepsi has expanded its reach to other products like quaker oats, Tropicana fruit juice, lays potato chips, cheetos, Gatorade etc. One of the Pepsi’s popular product was its ‘ Diet Pepsi’. It was introduced in 1964. Its main highlight was that it was a sugar free drink making it available to all larger section people. It had zero calories and also very less sugar content it and was an instant hit among the youth. PepsiCo is a leading company in soft drinks, snacks and foods and beverages. It has a revenue of more than 39 billion dollars and has employee strength of more than 1,85,000 people. PepsiCo company consist of mainly 3 companies. PepsiCo Americas Foods (PAF), PepsiCo Americas Beverages (PAB), and PepsiCo International (PI). PepsiCo’s products are one of the most recognized products in today’s world. PepsiCo’s increase in success is mainly due to high standard of performance, commitment, determination and hard work of each and every member of the PepsiCo family. Pepsi also follows one of the best marketing strategies and business practices. PepsiCo has faced many challenges in its history. It has had its toughest competition from its rival Coca-Cola. It also faced......

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Effective Communication of Pepsi Co

...Strategies of Pepsi Cola Table of Contents Executive Summery 3 Introduction 4 History 5 Effective Marketing and communication strategies of Pepsi 6 Media Commercials 6 Advantage of media commercials 6 Disadvantages of media commercials 7 Sponsorships 7 Advantages of Sponsorships 8 Disadvantages of Sponsorships 8 How to enhance the effectiveness of Sponsorship 8 Community Activities 8 Advantages of Community activities 9 Disadvantages of community activities 9 How to enhance the effectiveness of CSR projects 9 Product Diversification 10 Advantages of Product diversification 10 Disadvantages of product diversification 10 How to enhance the effectiveness of Product Diversification 11 Cross Comparison between the marketing strategies of Pepsi, Coca Cola, V and Red Bull 11 Conclusion 13 References 14 Executive Summery Pepsi is an aerated Soft drink that is produced by Pepsi Co. Inc. Pepsi Cola is using most of the modern communication and marketing methods to enhance their brand awareness among its consumers. Mainly they are advertising their brand on Television, Face book, Twitter and YouTube. In this report I have outlined the overview of the Pepsi Cola Corporation and its history, and the most effective communication strategies that are used by them to enhance their brand equity. These strategies include Advertisements, Sponsorships, Online promotions, Community activities and Product diversification of Pepsi Cola......

Words: 3206 - Pages: 13

Pepsi Co

...strategy and structure to accomplish their organisational goals.   Introduction Over a three year period from 1998-2001, PepsiCo made 2 major acquisitions. Each acquisition was made for a price premium that could only be repaid by finding new synergies and economies of scale. This required PepsiCo to develop new organisational structures designed to deliver these major benefits. PepsiCo is the world’s largest snack and crisp manufacturer with annual sales of US$29 Billion dollars, although PepsiCo is better known for its carbonated drinks. The table below lists some of their top brands, which includes those that arrived through its acquisitions strategy in the 6 years leading to 2004. Brand Worldwide sales (US$ bn) Regular Pepsi 17.0 Diet Pepsi 6.0 Mountain Dew 5.5 Gatorade Sports Drink 5.2 Acquired 2001 Lays Potato Chips 5.0 Doritos Tortilla Chips 3.0 Tropicana Juice Drink 2.9 Acquired 1998 7Up Drink (Outside the USA) 2.4 Aquafina bottled water 2.3 Cheetos Cheese Flavoured Snacks 2.0 Quaker Cereals 1.5 Acquired 2001 Table 1: PepsiCo leading brands. Lynch (2009:451) The acquisitions of Quaker cereals, Tropicana and Gatorade left PepsiCo with new strategy and structural challenges to optimise the benefits from their newly acquired brands. The obvious benefits from acquiring these brands would not be suffient, to constitute the premium price paid for these brands. The new challenges and opportunities brought on an exciting era for PepsiCo. It was of......

Words: 2894 - Pages: 12

Strategic Analysis of Pepsi-Cola Co.

...This essay will take a look at the company Pepsi Cola. For a better understanding of the subject company, this paper will delve into a brief history of the Pepsi Company’s growth over the years and the effects of competition on Pepsi’s strategies in the international and domestic market. This essay will attempt to discuss the effectiveness of Pepsi’s marketing strategies and its results. Body Pepsi was one of several other brands that got their start in the late 1800s. A North Carolina pharmacist named Caleb Bradham invented "Brad's Drink" in 1893, which was later renamed Pepsi-Cola. Pepsi’s early growth was less significant than that of Coke's, and its real strength as a competitor to Coke began after Alfred Steele became CEO in 1950, a time when Pepsi was nearly bankrupt. Steele was expected to liquidate the Pepsi-Cola Co. Instead, he made it his goal to "beat Coke" (Wolburg, 2003). Pepsi Cola has taken part of that appeal and has used it in several different marketing strategies. Pepsi was born after Coca Cola, or Coke. It began in North Carolina, invented by a pharmacist named Caleb Bradham. It came out for public use on August 28, 1898. It had the reputation for being a food drink; Bradham was a pharmacist and he claimed that his concoction aided digestion. This claim, in a way, was already a marketing strategy, because during those times, people were always buying medicinal aids for digestion. Pepsi spread to Canada in 1906, and the year......

Words: 2630 - Pages: 11

Pepsi Co.

...Pepsi Co. After reading through the articles pertaining to Pepsi and their current search for a new CEO, the question can be raised as to whether or not the company should hire from within or search elsewhere for a suitable replacement. When a company is deciding whether to hire from within the company or to choose an outsider, there are both positives and negatives that come with each side of the decision. Choosing an insider that has already worked in the company has its advantages such as conveying a positive message to other employees throughout the organization. For instance, promoting a hirer level executive to fill the CEO roll with show all current employees that if they work hard and dedicate themselves to their profession, they may be able to get promoted to higher-level positions. Secondly, by promoting within a company, a sign of relief goes out to the majority of the current executives who are working for the company because when an outsider is hired for the role of CEO, often they will bring their own management team with them thus taking away jobs from the current employees. Lastly, promoting from within an organization ensures that the knowledge of the corporate culture remains intact. When an outsider is hired, it takes time for that person to learn the ins and outs of an organization whether it is finding out whom the all-star employees are or just what the culture of the work place is like. In essence, hiring an outsider equals a longer learning period,...

Words: 459 - Pages: 2