Rawls' Original Position

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By vgz1106
Words 633
Pages 3
#2) Rawls’ original position and the veil of ignorance play a part with each other and focus on how a state will ultimately end up if people decide to form a social contract. Considering there are differences between people, such as social status, education, endurance, sex, race, etc…, Rawls says to imagine a veil of ignorance so decisions are not influenced from a place of self-interest. When individual persons part of a society, put a veil of ignorance each individual will disregard and eliminate bias notions amongst each other in that society including their own self. “Let us assume, to fix ideas, that society is a more or less self-sufficient association of persons who in their relations to one another recognize certain rules of conduct as binding and who for the most part act in accordance with them.” (Nozick, XB pg. 94-95 Para. 5) Rawls is assuming here that a society put aside their differences and acts accordingly by way of tacit acknowledgement concerning rules of conduct that connect them to each other.
The veil of ignorance is a significant part of Rawls’ original position. This gives Rawls’ concept of original position because there are no biases or judgmental decisions made and everyone in that society seeks the benefit of each other. Original position is then assumed since everyone in the supposed society is equal and has no bias opinions due to the veil of ignorance. Even though the original position is assumed and “…these rules specify a system of cooperation designed to advance the good of those taking part in it” (Nozick, XB pg. 94 [pp. 85] Para. 1) it doesn’t mean there won’t be a downside to his theory. The positive side of his theory as he states has to do with an identity of interests. Rawls says that life would be much better because there is a society to depend on with no biases; everyone is equal. A person will not have to go out and…...

Similar Documents

Rawls

...Rawls vs. Nozick In this essay I will explain the main theories Rawls and Nozick have on distributive justice and the role of the government in economic life, I will analyze and compare them and eventually indicate my preference. I will start with John Rawls and his thoughts in a theory of justice. Rawls strive to determine how we can make a society as just as possible. Rawls derives two principles; liberty principle and the difference principle. It is the latter I am going to analyze more closely. He also gives a theoretical device that he calls “the original position” and “the veil of ignorance” this device is ment to help us in the way that we picture our self behind a veil. We do not know the basic things about ourselves like our sex, age, financial status etc. This device is to help us be totally neutral in the sense that we do not know our status in society. After putting our self in a status quo if you will, we can now decide on what us just for the whole society. Rawls derives then the difference principle; to put this is Rawls own word the difference principle is: “Then the difference principle is a strongly egalitarian conception in the sense that unless there is a distribution that makes both persons better off an equal distribution is to be preferred.”(Rawls - theory of justice. 84/85) So in other words, the inequalities in a society can only be justified if it benefits the person that is least off. This is the main subject the debate between nozick and Rawls....

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Nozick vs. Rawls

...Trumbull Business Ethics 28 September 2012 Nozick & Rawls When trying to decide how to set up a basic, just society, there are two modern theories; the theories of justice from both John Rawls and Robert Nozick. Each theory has its ups and downs and can both be argued as just, or unjust. John Rawls’ theory starts with the “original position,” in which people make decisions or legislate laws behind what is called a “Veil of Ignorance.” Behind this “veil,” Rawls deprives us of any knowledge of our own attributes under which we know everything we need to about human nature generally, but nothing about ourselves – this includes gender, position, assets, professions, etc. The “veil” allows us to be objective and impartial and choose principles of basic fairness. We choose to lessen the downside of the society as a whole. Rawls uses a thinking experiment in which one puts themselves in a hypothetical reality where one is in the “original position.” Through this, individuals can decide how to set up a society by establishing principles of justice to be governed by. His thought experiment can be translated in a way where if we didn’t know what our positions in society would be, we would be more concerned for everyone equally. Basically, if it is possible for us to be in the least-advantaged status of a society, we will be a lot more concerned for the overall general welfare. If everyone starts off in the same position, it makes agreement between everyone much......

Words: 1310 - Pages: 6

Position

...Running head: DETERMINING YOUR PERFECT POSITION Assignment: Determining Your Perfect Position LDR/531 DETERMINING YOUR PERFECT POSITION: Leadership is an extremely important element in the achievement of any organization or company in international market. In case leadership is below average, the influence comes on efficiency. Being a part of free world, I suppose myself at the placement of leader of my imaginary organization. I select this position for me, after going through with the outcomes of Leadership Performance Test. The test had the title of, “What’s My Guidance Approach?” In this particular test the questions were given as follows, 1. I inspire motivation, participation, as well as creativity from my colleagues. 2. I as well as my people set up focal points for jobs to be completed. 3. I possess the abilities as well as sources required in order to carry out my duties efficiently. 4. I fix trouble as it happens, as well as think about the best interests of all involved. 5. I inspire motivation, participation, as well as creativity from my colleagues. 6. My people set up focal points for jobs to be completed. 7. I assign duty, responsibility as well as power efficiently. 8. I inspire my people in order to do their best on the job In the first question, I have scored 10 marks and in second obtained 14. It demonstrates that I am more tasks focused compared to having strong public relation, however 10...

Words: 1576 - Pages: 7

John Rawl

...John Rawls Roy Love Pol 462-01 Dr. Rose Tuesday, April 17, 2012 INTRODUCTION The philosopher and political thinker that I am doing my research paper on is John Rawls. John Rawls is world renowned as an American philosopher and a leading figure in moral and political philosophy. He was a student, professor, and an icon that achieved kleos apthiton to the highest regard. Mr. Rawls worked on many projects and wrote many books that we still use and reference today. Some of his works include: Justice as Fairness (2001), A Theory of Justice (1971), Political Liberalism (1993), and The Law of Peoples (1999). The most famous and influential work was the Theory of Justice, which was one of his first pieces of work; many say that book was his masterpiece. His work was so famous with the millions that read his work, that his work was nicknamed ‘Rawlsianism’. His work has been echoed through the ages and is quoted without people knowing who they are quoting. For example, the term veil of ignorance is used to describe the morality of an issue, like slavery. I have heard professors and others use that term without ever knowing where it came from. John Rawls has been the receipted of many awards, and according to the 42nd President of the United States, Bill Clinton, he helped a whole generation of learned Americans revive their faith in democracy itself (B. Clinton 1999). One of his famous students, Samuel Freeman, wrote a book in 2007 that will show some insight on how John Rawls......

Words: 1073 - Pages: 5

The Original Shithead

...consistently “tells” her boss that she is “a good worker and a genius” and that he does not “appreciate her”.  Even after a few months of training and support, she is unable to use the computer tools to be productive and efficient in completing the required tasks. The employee was hired for the specific position which requires the use of the computer applications to complete the required tasks. However, there is obviously a mismatch between her skills and the required work for that position. The computer applications are basic to her job which means that if she really was “a good worker and a genius” she would be able to learn quickly and apply that knowledge and those skills to the job. The computer applications could be very complicated and difficult to master, but the word “basic” implies the contrary. A few months of training and support should be enough for a “genius” to learn basic tasks but Jennifer, the employee, still hasn’t learned to use the computer tools to be productive and efficient. Therefore, as a manager, I could either reassign her to a different position in the company in order to utilize her “genius” competencies, or I could dismiss her from the position and the company, following the employment-at-will doctrine. In this specific scenario, I would most likely dismiss her completely due to the obvious mismatch of her skills and the job responsibilities. It is no longer suitable to keep spending time and resources to try and teach her the basic work if......

Words: 1582 - Pages: 7

Rawls Theory of Justice

...Presentation of Rawls Back track: original position is "to set up fair procedure to which any decisions that are made will be just." He attempts to use "pure procedural justice" as a basis of theory Two principals are First : each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others. Second: social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone's advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all." Knowing utilitarianism pertains to maximizing happiness ; Rawls believes this to be an alternative. He believes utilitarianism can negatively effect individual rights because maximizing happiness for an individual may involve removing certain rights from other individuals. Everything you heard is his answer to how happiness to a degree can be achieved since utilitarianism is one of the most scrutinized theories because in many cases, i believe promotes Liberalism in some sense. His alternative incorporates making decisions under uncertainty and maxim. They work hand in hand because the maximum of uncertainty should be appealing to all in charge of decision making. they are all equal in the fact that none should feel embarrassment or shame to another. No one is higher than another. Rawls continues after talking about the veil of ignorance, by speaking of the rationality of parties. Rawls......

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Original Sin

...Judaism’s Rejection of the Original Sin In the bible, the story of Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis serves as scriptural evidence of humankind’s first transgression of God’s command resulting in the expulsion from paradise. Christians claim that humans are tainted from the fall and many scholars reinforce the idea of a recovery narrative, which depicts the bible as following a pattern of decline and recovery, thereby reinforcing the belief that something was once lost and must be recovered. After mankind’s fall from the state of perfection, Christians believed that Jesus was their savior and would consequently sacrifice himself in order to redeem man. Through the act of disobedience in Genesis emerged the concept of the original sin, which stipulates that humans are born sinners and that sins pass from parent to child as an inherited characteristic. Jewish believers, however, often criticize this notion and although they acknowledge that the human race came under the dominion of sin, which would affect their subsequent environment, Judaism, unlike Christianity denies that man is born into this world in a state of sin. Judaism affirms that the act of sinning is not part of the human condition but rather represents a conflict between two opposing inclinations (a good and an evil tendency) and that man has the ability to resist sin and can overcome the evil inclination by willing himself to become a righteous person. Therefore, Jewish people believe that man is......

Words: 2065 - Pages: 9

Why Does Mills Think That Utilitarianism Provides the Foundation for Justice and Why Does Rawls Reject It?

...Name Professor Course Date Why does Mills think that Utilitarianism provides the foundation for Justice and why does Rawls reject it? Introduction The concept of utilitarianism is one that has engulfed the philosophical arena with an obscene number of arguments that support and/or criticize it. Generally, utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics that defines an action as one that ensures maximum utility. Other schools of thought would like to put it as the concept of “maximizing happiness while reducing suffering” (Mills 3).In as much as utilitarianism has continued to receive applause from people and the political scene, other divergent scholars has come up with other theories that seek to compromise the philosophies under which the concept of utilitarianism operates. As a result, utilitarianism has become subject to contradictions from other theories in the field of ethics. The thinking class in other fields of utilitarianism characterizes in as a quantitative yet reductionist approach to ethics (Mills 3). Over time, the concept of utilitarianism has received ideological threats from; deontological ethics which does not assign moral worth to an action based on its consequences, virtue ethics that solely deals with action and habits that results to happiness, pragmatic ethics and other forms of ethics that backs the idea of consequentialism. In a nut shell, the concept of utilitarianism as defined by political philosophers and in relation to justice is......

Words: 3508 - Pages: 15

Module 3 Original Assignment

...matters. Rawls states that any action that is taken should focus on providing the most benefit to the least advantaged persons of the society. So it would be imperative for companies to provide these drugs not only to the people who can afford it, but to the least advantage people of the society which would be the poor. 4. do companies have an ethical obligation to make drugs available in poor countries at little or no cost? Many of these countries that these drugs are being tested in are very poor, so it becomes a matter of the ethics and morals of the company that is testing these products there. After a clinical trial has ended, it is most likely impossible for the people of the country to be able to afford these drugs that have most likely been helping them for the duration of the trial. I believe they do have an ethical obligation to make these drugs available to the people who are participating in these clinical trials and that they should take into consideration the price at which these people can afford these drugs. In regards to Rawls’ theory, decisions are supposed to be made under a veil of ignorance. Under this veil, we do not know our societal roles, or other societal norms. It takes away bias because it does not give the person in the original position something to compare certain concepts. This would be a fair way in deciding whether it is ethical to supply these drugs to poorer nations at little or no cost. The people in the original position......

Words: 1476 - Pages: 6

Wp2 Original

...Assessment. Part 5: Combining information A (1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 3.3) In this Part of the Assessment, you will need to apply knowledge you have gained in Session 5 of your WP2 Unit. You will need to download the resource files fruitandveggiepeople_logo and rainforest_image from the Unit Assessment Page to complete this Part of the Assessment. 1. Open the document WP2_newsletter that you saved at the end of Part 3. 2. Insert the image fruitandveggiepeople_logo into your newsletter. 3. Right align this image in the header of your document. 4. Crop / position / resize / wrap the image so that it fits well within the header. 5. Insert the rainforest_image into your document at an appropriate point. 6. Format this image so that it appears in the newsletter in a professional way and fits well with the rest of the newsletter content. Note: You may consider looking at things like the position, size and wrapping when formatting your documents. 7. Create a hyperlink to http://www.thefruitandveggiepeople.com on the text thefruitandveggiepeople.com. Save the amended version of the newsletter WP2_newsletter, and then paste a screenprint of your document in the space below. Make sure it shows the changes you have made to Page 1 of your newsletter. Use more than one screenprint if necessary. Remember to save the work you’ve done on your WP2 Assessment! Part 6: Combining information B (1.4, 1.6) In this Part of......

Words: 2647 - Pages: 11

Foxy Original Case Study

...TO: Jen Kluger, Suzie Orol FROM: DATE: September 12, 2011 SUBJECT: Foxy Originals Expansion into U.S. Market Introduction This memorandum compares two approaches Foxy Originals can take to expand their Canada-based operations into U.S. markets. Specifically, CVP analyses will be conducted to figure out the financial implications of each method. Finally, recommendations will be made about how Foxy Originals should proceed in its expansion. Mission of Foxy Originals Jen Kluger and Suzie Orol built Foxy Originals on the principles of having fun, gaining exposure for new product lines, and staying ahead of fashion trends. Foxy offers high style and high-quality jewelry at an affordable price, targeted toward women between 18 and 30 years of age. Kluger and Orol have established a strong Foxy presence in the Canadian market and are now ready to expand into the much larger United States markets with the hope of growing profit by at least $100,000. Kluger and Orol first have to decide whether the best method of distribution going forward is to attend trade shows or hiring sales representatives in the key U.S. fashion hubs. Option 1: Personal Attendance Trade shows are a good place to expand a business because they are very large, often with over 75,000 buyers. Jewelry companies set up booths to showcase their products to these potential buyers, who then place orders for select merchandise they would like to sell in their stores. Trade shows are a good place to learn...

Words: 849 - Pages: 4

The Original Keep

...The Original Keep We know that after the Norman Conquest (and the initial massacres) Britain settled down to an uneasy peace. The Viking raids became much less of a concern, everyday life was probably more settled than it had been in the 10th century. The Normans bought with them castle building technologies, and throughout the 11-14th centuries they build hundreds of castles throughout England, which in turn influenced Scottish Kings and barons to build their own fortifications. The foundations of Hogwarts Castle probably dates from this period. The important thing to remember is that Hogwarts Castle was never built to be a school because boarding schools, as we would understand them, did not exist at the point when it was built. It was likely that the original hill fort settlement of Hogwarts was already in an ideal defensive location and the local baron (probably also a magical person) started building a castle to protect the economically important town. The first phase of building would have resulted in nothing more than a square stone tower (called a keep) and strengthening of existing walls. However we know from history that castles, if they were strategically important, were constantly expanded and updated. Thus Hogwarts castle probably grew in size over the next few centuries adding a great hall, towers, ramparts etc. The round towers described in the book would not have been added until the 14th century, when it was discovered that round towers were......

Words: 1267 - Pages: 6

Rawls

...John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John rawls John......

Words: 268 - Pages: 2

Theory of Justice (Rawls

...equality. It may seem like a double standard to some but in fact it is not. This subject can be looked at from three different points of view the first being individuals who are hard workers and still can’t seem to thrive. It is this group who really suffer the most, fairness to them would them having the same opportunities to do as well as the upper classes. Sometimes it is due to their own decisions that they are in the position they are in but many times they are just recipients of bad luck. The next group of people are the people who are lazy and still think they deserve to have the same success as the next level of the monetary food chain. These individuals believe fairness is them being handed what others work very hard for. This is not that same idea of fairness that most of the rest of the country subscribes to . The third group is the individuals who thrives. These people are the upper-middle class and upper class who worked hard to get educations and/or build up their skills in a particular field which allows them to thrive (Lawhead 588) Does Rawls have a point? Yes. It becomes apparent that those who work hard and have success should not be held back by those who do not have the same success. If everyone receives the same “equal” share the more successful people would have no reason to work hard and truly be successful because they will always have the same as everyone else. At the same time it cannot be forgotten that there is a group of hard workers that are......

Words: 328 - Pages: 2

John Rawls

...| John Rawls | Justice and Equality | | [Type the author name] | 5/25/2012 | Ethics and the Legal Environment LS 312 Kaplan University | John Rawls was born in 1921 in Baltimore, Maryland. His father was a well known attorney, and his mother was a chapter president of the League of Women Voters. His parents, through occupation and affiliation were questioners of society as and its’ injustices. This I would think was a contributing factor in John Rawls philosophy of justice as fairness. His time in World War II challenged his faith as he learned of the holocaust and senseless killings upon innocent people in combat. Then the Vietnam War caused Rawls, like many other Americans, to begin to challenge the political system and how conscientious resistance from citizens could affect policies. (Wenar, 2008) Rawls attended Princeton University John Rawls is claimed to be the most important political philosopher of this century. His articles of the 60s and his first book, Theory of Justice written in 1971, was about collective coercive power and its’ use in demanding justice and fairness in a societies as addressed in his dissertation in 1951, “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics”. (Richardson, 2005) Rawls also studied at Oxford University. His first appointments were at Cornell University and MIT and joined the Harvard University faculty in 1962 where he remained for his career of thirty years. (Wenar, 2008)John Rawls had a philosophy of......

Words: 840 - Pages: 4