Superior Manufacturing

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Gorod
Words 1313
Pages 6
Introduction
Superior Manufacturing Company is a company that had a loss of $688,000 in 2004. Manufacturing products 101, 102, and 103, cost analysis shows that products 102, and 103 have been unprofitable. SMC is also a company that has many competitors with products that are very similar so raising prices would cause customers to search for alternatives. The dominant competitor, Samra Company has been the cost regulator in the market by setting prices to be matched by competition. The manufacturing process uses three horizontally integrated dedicated factories that do not typically operate at capacity. Superior Manufacturing Company also uses a standard value costing method that is based on past performance.
Decision to keep Product 103
Continuing production vs. Stopping production assumptions * Continue to pay fixed costs, not sell machinery immediately, and cut power to the building * Immediately reduce all direct labour costs, and reduce indirect labour costs to 5% for administration involving the property
Table 1 (In thousands $) | Continue Production | Stop Production | Rent | $ 1,882 | $ 1,882 | Property Taxes | $ 401 | $ 401 | Property Insurance | $ 534 | $ 534 | Compensation Insurance | $ 458 | $ 5.77 | Direct Labour | $ 6,879 | | Indirect Labour | $ 2,309 | $ 115.45 | Power | $ 302 | | Light and Heat | $ 106 | | Building Service | $ 75 | | Materials | $ 4,851 | | Supplies | $ 350 | | Repairs | $ 104 | | Total | $ 18,249 | $ 2,938.22 | Selling Expenses | $ 4,701 | | General Administration | $ 1,783 | $ 89.15 | Depreciation | $ 3,658 | $ 3,658 | Interest | $ 539 | $ 539 | Total Cost | $ 28,930 | $ 7,224.37 | Less: Other Income | $ 51 | | | $ 28,879 | | Sales | $ 26,670 | | Profit (Loss) | $ (2,209) | $ (7,224.37) |
As can be seen in Table 1, Superior Manufacturing Company should not…...

Similar Documents

Superior Manufacturing Company Case

...Description: The Superior Manufacturing Company received a net loss income statement for a good business year (2004). SMC has only 3 products and lots of competitors with similar products. So, price cutting always need a reduction by all the competitors in this industry. The manufacturing strategy of SMC is based on the ‘dedicated factory’, which means each product has its own productive factory. And SMC has a simple cost system. This cost system has 2 categories of costs. First one refers to the costs can be tied directly to the manufacture of specific products. Second one refers to the indirect costs and other costs. Problem and issue: SMC uses a new standard cost system in 2005 which is used to value inventories, prepare budgets, and analyze performance. The manager thinks the product 103 should be dropped for its high cost which could not be cut down, and the product 102 has an increasing demand. Also, the managers want to make a price reduction. However, they find that the costs are too high to support the price reduction. Does the cost system of SMC work effectively? Firstly, we calculate the loss of drop of product 103. We use the data of 2004. If we drop 103, the operating loss would be 4933. Secondly, we calculate the reduction price of product 101. If price of product 101 = 24.5 Profit = 750000*[24.5*(1-1.08%)-10.48]-12.36*996859 = -2004450 If price of product 101 = 22.5 Profit = 1000000*[22.5*(1-1.08%)-10.48]-12.36*996859 = -544000 We can see when the...

Words: 331 - Pages: 2

Superior Supermarkets

...Superior Supermarkets Everyday Low Pricing In: Business and Management Superior Supermarkets Everyday Low Pricing Superior Supermarkets (SS) is a division of Hall Consolidated, a privately owned wholesale and retail food distributor. Hall distributes food and related products to some 150 company-owned supermarket units and about 1,100 independent grocery stores in the U.S. through 12 wholesale distribution centers. Superior is the smallest of the three supermarket chains owned by Hall, with sales of $192.2 million in 2002. Sales of three Centralia stores were $14,326,700 in 2002. Randall Johnson, the District Manager for the Centralia stores, has recommended that they implement everyday low pricing (ELP) since Superior’s prices are higher than the competition at a time of growing price consciousness, and that the price differential could cause them to lose market share. Problem Statement Superior Supermarkets (SS) must decide whether o not to pursue an everyday low pricing (ELP) strategy at its three Centralia MO locations. Analysis Three viable alternatives have been found. Alternative #1 is to do nothing. Do not adopt ELP and keep the current promotional budget. If market share continues to decline, at the growth rate of -0.53% or greater, this alternative would be deemed unsuccessful. Conversely, if market share remains stagnant or improves, this strategy would prove to be prudent.    Alternative #2 is to implement a ‘limited ELP’ model. By marginally increasing......

Words: 324 - Pages: 2

Superior Manufacturing Company

...CONTENTS Analysis of the case 2 Q1) Do you agree with Walters decision to keep product 103? 3 Analysis of Profit and loss statement 4 Sensitivity analysis 6 Strategic scenarios 8 Q2) Should superior lower as of January 1, 2006 its prices of product 101? To what price? 10 Q3) why did Supreme improve profitability during the period of January 1 to June 30, 2005? 13 Analysis 14 Q4) why is it important that Superior has an effective cost system? 17 What is your overall appraisal of the company’s cost system and its use in report to management 18 List the strengths and weaknesses of the system and its related reports for the purpose management uses the system’s output 18 What recommendations, if any, would you make to waters regarding the company’s cost accounting system and its related reports? 19 Initial Analysis of Superior Manufacturing Company Case :- 1) After death of Richard Harvey (2004), founder and president of Superior Manufacturing Company (SMC), Paul Harvey took over. Paul Harvey had only 4 years of experience. Soon followed serious management problems because of some bad decisions made by Paul Harvey. The income statement of 2004 reflected net loss of $0.68million in a good business year. To solve this problem Herbert Waters was brought over as General Manager of SMC. 2) SMC manufactured 3 different products namely 101, 102, 103 and was among the top 8 companies in the industry. Samra Company was market leader and announced price annually and......

Words: 4716 - Pages: 19

Superior Manufacturing Company

...In Class Quiz October 8, 2013 Question: What factor or factors explain real wage convergence between the old world and the new during the period roughly 1870-1914? Did everyone benefit equally from the process? Answer: Before talking about convergence, it useful to say something about the level of real wages in the old world and in the new. In the old world, wages were relatively low because there was an abundance of labour while in the new world there was a scarcity of labour so that real wages there were relatively high. The question then: what forces were operating during this period to push up the real wages in the old world and/or down in the new world (and to move land rents in the opposite direction)? As many of you said, there were essentially three: 1. Migration, the movement of young, able-bodied, unskilled, mostly male workers from the old world to the new, pushed up the real wage in the old world as the labour force shrank and caused it to decline in the new world as the labour force increased. O’Rourke and Williamson maintain that migration explains most of the convergence during this period – in fact, it over-explains it. 2. The second was commodity market integration, thanks to technological advances in transportation – steam ships, railroads, refrigeration – that substantially reduced the cost of moving goods between the old world and the new and increased the variety and type of goods that could be moved. As a result, natural resources and......

Words: 482 - Pages: 2

Superior Manufacturing Company

...DI MILANO Master of Science in Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering [pic] Management Control Systems Prof. Paolo Maccarrone Second Assignment: Superior Manufacturing Company Analysis Group Ferrario Andrea 709407 Rognoni Susanna 720851 Taiana Marco 672497 Trifonov Angel 720619 A.Y. 2007/2008 Contents Q1.Do you agree with Water’s decision to keep product 103? 3 Analysis of the P&L statement of 31 December 2004 3 Sensitivity analysis 5 Strategic scenarios 9 Q2. Should Superior lower as of January 1, 2006 its price of product 101? To what price? 11 Q3. Why did Superior improve profitability during the period January 1 to June 30, 2005? How useful was the data in exhibit 4 for the purpose of this analysis? 14 Revenues 15 Costs 15 Q4. Why is it important that Superior has an effective cost system? What is your overall appraisal of the company’s cost system … 19 Why is it important that Superior has an effective cost system? 19 What is your overall appraisal of the company’s cost system and its use in report to management? 19 List the strengths and weaknesses of the......

Words: 7176 - Pages: 29

Superior Manufacturing

...--------- + ---------- +.... + ----------  (1 + R) (1 + R)^2 (1 + R)^8  Where R is the required return this is a study guide, not a cheat sheet.  Net Present Value:  NPV = PV - TI where TI = Total Initial Investment  Using a calculator we find that:  PV = $2,229,365.07  NPV = PV - TI = $2,229,365.07 - $1,200,000 = $1,029,365.07  ----------------------------------------------------------  3. Based on your answer for Q2, do you think the project should be accepted? This is a study guide, not a cheat sheet. Why? Assume Superior Manufacturing has a policy of not accepting projects with life of over 3 years.  Definition of Payback Criterion:  -Accept a project if its payback period is less than maximum acceptable payback period.  -Reject a project if its payback period is longer than maximum acceptable payback period.  The payback period is less than the 3 years, then the project fits the limit policy of Superior Manufacturing, then the project is acceptable by this criterion. This is a study guide, not a cheat sheet.  The NPV is positive and very atractive. The NPV criterion has considerable merits:  - It takes in to account the time value of money  - It considers the cash flow stream in its project life  The NPV Decision Rule says:  -Accept a project if NPV >= 0.  So by this criterion the project is also acceptable.  -----------------------------------------------------------  4. If the project required additional investment in land......

Words: 8914 - Pages: 36

Superior Manufacturing

...Homework 5: Oracle Crystall Ball MIS 6543 Business Analytics Fall 2013 Arkansas State University Instructor: Dr. Ahmad Syamil Due date: 8:00 PM, Wednesday, December 11, 2013. Name your homework files using your name and location, and then put them on Blackboard>MIS6543> Course Tools>Journals>Digital drop box>Create Journal Entry>Write an appropriate title and message including whether you are an online or face-to-face student> Attach file. Inform me by email after you submit your file. Of course you can submit your homework earlier. If you are an ASU Jonesboro face-to-face student, you must also submit the complete hard copy of your work under my office door (BU 406) by the due time. Do not submit the hard copy of the answer to each problem oneby-one. You can get Oracle Crystal Ball simulation software for chapter 13 from http://www.oracle.com/crystalball/index.html or http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/crystalball/downloads/index.html ?ssSourceSiteId=ocomen If you never register on the Oracle website, Oracle will ask you to register before downloading Oracle Crystal Ball (CB). Furthermore, you can only use the CB trial version for 2 weeks. Therefore, you should start working on this assignment no sooner than 2 weeks before the day you plan to submit this assignment. Using an older version of CB is also acceptable. Use Google. If you use one version for 2 weeks, you may be able to install another version for another 2 weeks. Consequently, you can use CB for 4 weeks....

Words: 2066 - Pages: 9

Superior Manufacturing

...Nopat ( UO * 1-TX) +amortizaciones +provisiones +depreciaciones =FCB -DIF KTNO -DIF AF OP =FCL +DIF DEUDA -GASTOS FINA *(1-TX) =FL PARA LOS ACCIONISTA + DIF KAPITAL -DIVIDENDOS = FCN Liquidez Kw: Act C-Pasivo C Prueba acida (AC-INV)/PASIVO C Razon c=(ac/pc) Palanca: me/pkt CICLO NEGOCIO = ROTACION C*C DIAS+ ROTACION INVEN DIAS CICLO DE EFECTIVO= CICLO DEL NEGOCIO – CUENTAS *PAGAR Actividad Rot c*p=(compras/c*p)= veces Rot inv= (cv/inv)= veces ROTACION CUENTAS* C=(ventas/c*c)= vece ROT AC=(VENTAS/ACTIVOS) KTNO=INV+C*C-C*P AO=KTNO+AF EBITDA= UO+DEP+AMORT+PRO MARGEN O= UO/ VENTAS CONT FINAN=ROA-CD(1-TX)*(D/P) = ROE-ROA NOPAT=UO(1-TX) GASTOS FINAN= CD CP*DCP+(CDLP*DLP) APALNCAMIENTO FIAN (Aon/PATRIMONIO) RAZON ENDEUDAMIENRO=DEUDA t/ACTon ESTRUCTURA DE K =(DEUDA total/PATRIMO) CONCENTRACION (DCORTO PLAZO/DEUDA total) CONTRIBUION=EBIT/GASTO IN O UO/ GI ROA=NOPAT/AON ROE=UNF/PATRIMONIO Contr f= roe-roa EVA=UODI-(WACC*aon) WACC=CD*D/D+P+KE*(P/D+P) INDICE DUPONT ROE ANALIS DUPINT EMPRESAA | ((V/aon)*(AON/PATRI)*(UO/VENTAS) | | | *APALNACAMINETO*ROT ACT*MARGEN OP | | | | | ABALISI DUPONT ACTI | (UO/VENTAS)*(VENTAS/ACTIVOS) | | | MARGEN OP* ROT ACT | Deuda corto plazo%=deuda cp/deuda total Deuda plazo%=deuda lp/dt (dcp%*cdcp)+(dlp*cdlp)=COSTO DE LA DEUDA WACC=CD(1-TX)*(D/D+P))+(KE*(P/D+P) EVA=NOPAT-(WACC*AON) Pkt=ktno/ventas TIC = (RENT NETA DEL ACTIVO*TRU)/1-RENT OP ACT* TRU TCS= (RENT NETA DEL......

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Superior Supermarkets

...Superior Supermarkets Memo Memorandum To: James Ellis, President of Superior Supermarkets CC: Randall Johnson, District III Manager of Superior Supermarkets From: Matthew Clemente RE: Potential Everyday Low Pricing Strategy Date: April 9, 2010 The challenge presented to the President of Superior Supermarkets James Ellis and his district manager Randall Johnson is whether or not to implement an everyday low pricing strategy to the Superior Supermarkets stores in Centralia, MO. Superior Supermarkets’ current pricing strategy is a high-end branding strategy, giving them the highest prices in Centralia. With their declining market share the past seven years (they currently have 23% market share in 2002, down from 31% just three years ago; see Exhibit 2) Superior Supermarkets looks to increase their rising revenues from the past three years (Exhibit 4), regain their past successful market share and maintain their already successful contribution margin. To accomplish these three goals, there are several alternatives that Superior Supermarkets could employ to help them retake the market in Centralia. The three locations of Superior Supermarkets in Centralia certainly give them precedence in location, but their market share should certainly be higher with the various options of location they give their customers. However, customers in Centralia are certainly price-sensitive and a new pricing strategy must certainly be considered to give Superior Supermarkets......

Words: 1216 - Pages: 5

Superior Manufacturing Co.

...105-S16 REV: 12 AGOSTO, 2004 JAMES W. CULLITON DAVID F. HAWKINS JACON COHEN Superior Manufacturing Company En febrero de 2005, Herbert Waters fue nombrado director general por Paul Harvey, presidente de Superior Manufacturing Company. Waters, de 56 años de edad, poseía una amplia experiencia en la fabricación de productos similares a los de Superior. El nombramiento de Waters era consecuencia del problema planteado por la muerte de Richard Harvey, fundador y presidente de Superior hasta su fallecimiento al comienzo de 2004. Paul Harvey, de 34 años de edad, tenía solamente cuatro años de experiencia de trabajo en la compañía. Su padre proyectaba entrenarle durante un período de diez años, pero su prematura muerte le había impedido realizarlo. El joven Harvey se convirtió en presidente a la muerte de su padre, y había ejercido pleno control en la compañía hasta el momento en que Waters entró a formar parte de ella. Nueva dirección Paul Harvey sabía que a lo largo de 2004 había cometido varios errores y se daba cuenta de que había decaído la moral de la organización, al parecer debido a la falta de confianza en él. Cuando dispuso de la cuenta de pérdidas y ganancias de 2004 (véase Anexo 1), la pérdida de casi 688.000 dólares sufrida en un año de actividad económica general favorable, le convenció de que necesitaba ayuda. Consiguió captar a Waters, que estaba trabajando en una empresa competidora, ofreciéndole una participación de capital además del sueldo, sabiendo......

Words: 3020 - Pages: 13

Superior Manufacturing Company

...Superior  Manufacturing  Company     Description   Superior   manufacturing   company   produces   three   kinds   of   industrial   products   (101,102   and   103)   in   its   own   dedicated   factories.   It   uses   a   job   costing   system   helping  to  evaluate  and  arrange  the  whole  process  of  production,  which  is  later   replaced   by   a   standard   cost   system   in   2005.   In   the   market   of   similar   products,   Superior   faces   seven   competitors,   one   of   which   is   the   dominant   company   Samra,   a   price-­‐maker   to   some   extent.   As   shown   in   the   figure,   Superior   suffered   a   loss   during   2004.   What   is   worse,   a   weakened   industry   and   some   other   problems   like   price  reduction  are  coming  in  the  following  years.     Problems  and  issues   In   terms   of   management   changes   and   other   reasons,   Superior   suffered   a   big   loss   even   during   an   optimistic   business   year.   It   is   obvious   situation   didn’t   change   better  in  the  next  year. ......

Words: 469 - Pages: 2

Superior Manufacturing Company

...the prices of materials and supplies in 2006. (did not take into consideration the change of price of sales, admin, indirect labor…) Sensitivity analysis In order to make recommendations for a possible strategic course of actions we need to take in consideration the variance of some key indicators. These are: 1. The operating capacity of the facility and the level at which it operates now. 2. Possible changes on the market volume and company’s market share(expected reactions from the competitors) 3. Potential savings 4. Inventory costs Strategic scenarios Having in mind the analysis of the current situation we could offer some scenarios for strategic actions to the management of Superior Manufacturing. Referring back to the first paragraph we can explore the following options: Stop the production of product 103: 1. Stop production and any business related to product 103. 2. Stop production but outsource it to another company and continue the distribution. 3. Stop production and use the available production capacity in order to produce product 101 or 102. 1. Stopping the production of product 103 in the current situation would mean that the company will no longer produce a non profitable product. This will bring to avoiding a possible potential loss of at about 2.2 million $ assuming expected sales of 1million units. On the other hand it will bring as a loss all the non variable, fixed......

Words: 5438 - Pages: 22

Superior Manufacturing Company

...the cost associated with product 103 is fixed cost and Super Manufacturing Company will have to bear this fixed cost regardless of its decision to produce product 103 or not. Currently, product 103 incurs net loss of $2.209 million, and if Super Manufacturing Company decides not to produce product 103, then it will incur additional loss of $2.671 million through net contribution lost by product 103. However, if product 103 is dropped then it will increase the net loss of Super Manufacturing Company to $3.359 million. Hence, Waters’ decision to keep the product 103 and use its contributions to cover the fixed cost is a good decision. Q2.)  Should Superior Manufacturing Company lower as of January 1, 2006 its price of product 101? What will be the new price of product 101? The fixed and variable cost structure of product 101 shows that 54% of its standard cost is fixed and 46% is variable. However, a decrease in product 101 sales units will result in lost contribution because the larger part of cost is fixed and Superior Manufacturing Company will have to bear the fixed cost regardless the number of units sold. Hence, lower the number of sales units, lesser will be the recovery of fixed cost, therefore, Superior Manufacturing Company is suggested to lower its price in order to increase number of sales units of product 101. Pricing Decision Based on alternate of sales price and quantity demand, Superior Manufacturing Company is suggested to a set the sales price at $20.50, by......

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Superior

... BACKGROUND COMPANY Superior supermarket is the one of division of Consolidated Hall. Consolidated Hall is a privately owned wholesale and retail food distributor. In year 1959, the Hall Consolidated was formed. In year 1970, the first retail grocery store chain was purchased. The superior supermarket chain was acquired in 1975.The Hall distributed food and related products to some 150 company owned supermarket units operating under three supermarket chain names through 12 wholesale distribution centers.By year 2002 also,1,100 independent store also supplied by Hall distribution in Unites States. In the year, the sales were $2.3 billion. In supermarket chain owned by Hall consolidated, Superior supermarket is the smallest compared to three supermarket chain in Hall consolidated. The superior gained with sales of 192.2 million in year 2002.In trade areas with small cities and towns in South Central Unites States, the superior served them conventionally. The median size is about 44,000 square feet in United States. So the superior is considered small because the areas of the superior supermarket just cover about 20,730 square feet. Even though the size is small, the superior was the number 1 or number 2 in ranking of supermarket chain in each of its trade measured by market share. The figure 1.1 below had shown the front view of superior supermarket. Figure 1.1: The view in front of Superior Supermarket. 2.......

Words: 2981 - Pages: 12

Superior Anufacturing

...Answer Superior Manufacturing could lower their prices from the $24.50 current selling price to $22.50 that Samra is proposing to change its prices to. This would allow Superior Manufacturing to stay competitive. Unfortunately, in doing so Superior Manufacturing would have to sell more of product 101 in order to achieve its breakeven point. The lower the selling price that is charged, the higher the volume of unit sales need to be to support the breakeven. Variable Cost (VC) Fixed Cost (FC) Compensation Insurance 0.39 Rent 0.88 Direct Labor 6.06 Property Taxes 0.29 Materials 3.59 Property Insurance 0.25 Supplies 0.25 Indirect Labor 2.07 Power 0.11 Light & Heat 0.07 Repairs 0.08 Building Services 0.05 Total Variable Cost 10.48 Selling Exp. 4.27 General Administrative 1.62 Depreciation 2.65 Interest 0.25 Less: Other Income -0.04 Total Fixed Cost 12.36 $12.36 (Fixed Cost) x 996,859 (Units Sold) = $12,321,000 (Fixed Costs for 6 months) 750,000 Units x [$24.50 Selling Price x (1 - .0108 Cash Discount) – $10.48 Variable Cost] - $12,321,000 = - $2,004,450 1,000,000 Units x [$22.50 Selling Price x (1-.0108 Cash Discount) – $10.48 Variable Cost] - $12,321,000 = - $544,000 Question 3 Answer Superior......

Words: 960 - Pages: 4