Tort and Civil Action

In: Other Topics

Submitted By mikelarry6969
Words 357
Pages 2
A sum of money awarded in a civil action by a court to indemnify a person for the particular loss, detriment, or injury suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of another.

Compensatory damages provide a plaintiff with the monetary amount necessary to replace what was lost, and nothing more. They differ from Punitive Damages, which punish a defendant for his or her conduct as a deterrent to the future commission of such acts. In order to be awarded compensatory damages, the plaintiff must prove that he or she has suffered a legally recognizable harm that is compensable by a certain amount of money that can be objectively determined by a judge or jury.

One of the more heated issues facing the U.S. legal system during the past quarter century has been the call for reform of states' tort laws. health care providers and other organizations have sought to limit the amount of damages a plaintiff can receive for pain and suffering because they claim that large jury awards in Medical Malpractice cases cause premiums on medical insurance policies to rise, thus raising the overall costs of medical services. California took the lead in addressing concerns with rising medical costs when it enacted the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 3333.2 (1997). The act limits the recoverable amount for non-economic loss, such as pain and suffering, to $250,000 in actions based on professional Negligence against certain health care providers. Although the statute has been the subject of numerous court challenges, it remains the primary example of a state's efforts to curb medical costs through tort reform.

Other states have sought to follow California's lead, though efforts to limit compensatory damages have met with considerable resistance. Opponents claim that because these limitations greatly restrict the ability of juries and courts to analyze the true…...

Similar Documents

"A Civil Action" Overview

...After viewing the 1998 film “A Civil Action” and reading the article by Marc Galanter about “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead” we see that the framework applied to the American legal system by Galanter in his article at this point in time is held true in the film. What Galanter does is tell us about the two options that sides may be in a legal case. First there are the One-Shotters, which we will refer to as the OSs. These indivduals are often those who are not regulars within the legal system and often are only there once or maybe twice. A fine example of OSs are the husband and wife in a divorce case or the two parents in a custody case. As suggested by the name, these people usually are only in once. When it comes to the results that they expect it is often tangible. Because this is there one and only case, they are not concerned with a reputation in the courts but instead with real, physical, in a way, results. On the flip-side you have the Repeat Players which we will refer to as the RPs. These individuals, again as the name suggests, are those who frequent the courtroom and are often involved the same kinds of cases. These are what one would expect them to be such as the IRS trying people who did not pay their income taxes or a large corporation. Now the goals for a RP are very different than those of an OS. Instead of the tangible goals of the one-shotter, the RPs are out to often establish a reputation and establish relations to shape future decisions made in the courts...

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6


...Tort of Negligence A tort can be defined as civil wrong which is not a breach of contract i.e. committed against an individual, it is apparent from this definition that there is a distinction between contract and tort. A tortious liability is not undertaken voluntarily by the courts leaving the defendant or/party no option but to accept. A tort doesn’t arise as a result of a bargain but as a consequence of committing a tort. Contractual liability is usually strict but that arising out of a tort is always ALMOST based on fault. The tort of negligence by far is the most important tort as its widely defined and can be committed in the multitude of ways, compared to other torts that apply in more limited circumstances. In order to establish a tort of negligence the plaintiff must establish three things on a balance of probabilities: - *The defendant owed a duty of care *Defendant breached the duty of care *There was damage or injury *No defenses An important distinction that we need to make is for vicarious liability where the employer is vicariously liable for the negligence of the employee, if the employer was negligent during the course of his employment. Duty of Care – the court will ask two questions to determine liability i.e. proximity and foreseeability, the landmark case that supports this was Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]. The case surrounded where the claimant had a decomposed snail in her ginger beer, which caused her to suffer gastroenteritis, and site of......

Words: 629 - Pages: 3


...A. Torts 1. Compensatory and Punitive Damages Tort law involves civil liability between private parties. A plaintiff who wins a tort suit usually recovers the actual damages or compensatory damages that she suffered because of the tort. Depending on the facts of the case, these damages may be for direct and immediate harms, such as physical injuries, medical expenses, and lost pay and benefits, or for harms as intangible as loss of privacy, injury to reputation, and emotional distress. In cases where the defendant’s behavior is particularly bad, injured victims may also be able to recover punitive damages. Punitive damages are not intended to compensate tort victims for their losses. Instead, they are designed to punish flagrant wrongdoers and to deter them and others from engaging in similar conduct in the future. Theoretically, therefore, punitive damages are reserved for the worst kinds of wrongdoing. Punitive damages have always been controversial, but they have grown more so in recent years due to the size of some punitive damage awards and the perception that juries are awarding them in situations where they are not justified. 2. Negligence Defenses The common law traditionally recognized two defenses to negligence: contributory negligence and assumption of risk. In many states, however, one or both of these traditional defenses has been superseded by new defenses called comparative negligence and comparative fault. Contributory negligence is the......

Words: 3405 - Pages: 14

Tort Debate

...Torts Julie and Mary are plaintiffs for the J&M Jewelry store that opened in the Sunny Market Place. The defendants are Tom and Fred who own the Deluxe Jewelry in Sunny Market Place. Tom and Fred do not want the competition for their store so they decided to take action against J&M Jewelry and trespassed by entering their store without consent. An intentional tort is the most willful of torts, this intent is not to harm but rather to engage in a specific act, which ultimately results in an injury, physical or economic to another” (Kubasek, Browne, Herron, Meyer, Barkacs, Dhoodge, and Williamson 2012, p. 185). Tom and Fred had no intent on causing physical harm to the plaintiffs; they wanted them to be afraid with the hopes of leaving the premises. The defendants were hoping to scare the ladies away by robbing the store, so they would no longer have competition and keep customers to themselves. Julie was upset with what the defendants did and slapped Tom causing him to push her. Julie did something unlawful by slapping Tom causing an assault and battery, which he returned the harm by pushing her down. Kubasek, Browne, Herron, Meyer, Barkacs, Dhoodge, and Williamson (2012) define the legal principle of assault and battery as “An assault occurs when a person is placed in fear or apprehension of an offensive bodily contact; if the contact occurs, it constitutes a battery “(p. 187). Another tort that occurred in this scenario is the strict liability tort when Tom takes......

Words: 465 - Pages: 2

Tort Reform

...Tort Reform All humans on this earth, whether they live in a crowded city, a sparsely populated farming community, a developed or developing nation or a small tribe in the rainforests of the Amazon, have some way by which their civilization is led and regulated for the safety and comfort of its inhabitants. People living together in near proximity need some sort of social control to regulate conduct and relations be it by laws or morals or both. Ivan Nuy, an author who developed the Social Control Theory in 1958, proposed that there are four types of social control: Internal, Indirect, Control with Needs Satisfaction and Direct. Social Control Theory proposes that people's relationships, commitments, values, norms, and moral beliefs encourage them not to break the law. Thus, if moral codes are internalized and individuals are tied into, (their) community, they will voluntarily limit their propensity to commit deviant acts. [ (Nuy, 1958) ] Law is needed for when comfort, morals and disapproval fail to prevent undesirable acts against people in a society. In our country’s system, we have two main types of classifications for justice, civil law and criminal law. Criminal law, under public law, covers laws and regulations that aim to protect all members of the society. Its emphasis is on punishment. Criminal offenders are prosecuted by government officials, who must provide “the burden of proof” to prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable, doubt, usually a......

Words: 1694 - Pages: 7

Tort Law

...MATERIALS WEEK 1 The dotted line between ‘fault liability’ and ‘strict liability’: four ideal types of liability in tort law 1. Are the notions of fault and strict liability misleading? • two notions should be considered as they will be applied all along the four types of liability: - fault (as in fault liability) ( liability for one’s own faults. - risk (or strict liability) ( accountability, based on criteria other than individual fault, for the consequences resulting from an unlawful/illegal act. Four ideal types • a) Individual liability for one’s own faults ▪ the basis for this type of liability lies in the conduct of the person held liable. ( this deserves the qualification ‘fault liability’. ▪ article 6:162 BW is the legal basis for the duty to pay damages where the conduct of a person is qualified as wrongful. • b) Individual liability without blameworthiness ▪ accountability is required. ( elements of fault, as wrongful conduct provides the foundation but also elements of strict liability, since there may be no grounds for apportioning blame. ▪ article 6:162 BW as well as article 6:165 BW may provide some legal basis. • c) Liability for damage caused by others (vicarious liability) ▪ this is a form of strict liability, insofar as there is strict responsibility for the fault of others. ▪ Articles 6:169, 6:170, 6:171 and 6:172 BW provide some legal bases...

Words: 986 - Pages: 4

The Civil Action

...The Civil Action (1988) is film that based on a true story of an environmental lawsuit, which took place in Woburn, Mass. In this movie, Jan Schlittman, a personal injury lawyer, agrees to represent a group of families whose children died from leukemia after a large corporation carelessly deposed toxic chemicals damaged the water supply for Woburn, Mass. This case becomes Jan’s obsession, even to the extent that he is willing to give up everything. When we look at the case in ethical way, we can find several individuals and entities acting unethically. In this paper, we are going to discuss three unethical activities and entity occurred in the movie, including the ways local tanneries deposed toxic chemicals, and try to cover it after the lawsuit has been filed; the defendant attorney’s behaviors throughout the movie; the judge’s position in the case. First unethical activity is the ways local tanneries carelessly deposed toxic chemicals. As we know that toxic chemicals is danger in any course, and need to handle and depose in proper way. However, the local tanneries dump directly to the land, which they call “swimming pool”. After long period of time, the soul was loaded with toxic chemicals, and leaked them to the water supply. This is unethical and morally wrong. Moreover, after t lawsuit has been filed, they rented a dump truck and destroyed the evidences to cover what they did. Second unethical activity is the defendant attorney’s behaviors throughout the movie.......

Words: 629 - Pages: 3


...Grade: A University of London LLB, 2nd year Tort Law Question Amber Valley Primary School was closed 6 months ago by Amber Borough Council (ABC), the local education authority, which owns all the land and buildings. The school has been standing empty while ABC attempts to find a buyer for the site. Although ABC placed fencing around the site, local residents reported that youths had broken into the site on a number of occasions. Last week a group of youths from a nearby young offenders institution, operated by Chigley Services Ltd (CS) under contract to the Home Office, broke into the disused school and set fire to it. The youths had been clearing rubbish from a neighbouring stream and were supposed to have been under the supervision of Justin and Jason, both of whom are CS employees. However, Justin and Jason had gone for a cigarette break and left the youths unsupervised at the time the break-in occurred. The fire caused damage to neighbouring property including a baker's shop owned by Mark. It is likely to be many weeks before the business can reopen and Mark stands to lose many thousands of pounds in lost profits. It later transpired that the fire would not have had time to spread to neighbouring property had the Fire Brigade acted more swiftly. The Amber Valley Fire engine was unavailable at the time and another engine had to be dispatched from Leicester. The crew got lost on the way because they put the wrong address in the sat-nav (satellite......

Words: 4446 - Pages: 18

Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure

...Running head: Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure | | | Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure In defining the term law, tort law, criminal law, contract and the sources from which law derives, I will use a case that took place in 1929 “Donoghue v Stevenson” to demonstrate the these laws which will show a successful negligence suit, as well as defenses a defendant presenting evidence to refute a plaintiffs evidence. J.G. Holland said it best! In the words of J. G. Holland “Laws are the very bulwarks of liberty; they define every man’s rights, and defend the individual liberties of all men”. Laws are derived from the United States Constitution; Constitutional law is the body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. Established Constitutional and administrative law govern the affairs of the state. Constitutional law concerns both the relationships between the executive, legislature and judiciary and the human rights or civil liberties of individuals against the state. Most jurisdictions, like the United States and France, have a single codified constitution with a bill of rights. A few, like the United Kingdom, have no such document. A "constitution" is simply those laws which constitute the body politic, from statute, case law and convention. Law is defined as a system of......

Words: 1720 - Pages: 7

Scenario Involving Civil Liability and Civil Action

...Scenario Involving Civil Liability and Civil Action Jacquelyne Anderson Professor Phillip Edwards CJ499-01 September 14, 2014 In this scenario project I will identify four alleged crimes and one criminal civil action. In addition, I will apply principles involving criminal law relevant to the criminal justice practice, and I will demonstrate my understanding of civil liabilities relative to criminal justice agencies, and practitioners. Furthermore, I will identify case laws relevant to the possible civil action that could be brought against the police officer, the department and the city. After addressing these issues, I will have described a scenario involving a civil liability and a civil action. When identifying the four alleged crimes and the one criminal civil action, regarding this scenario project, the four alleged crimes are: 1) attempted robbery, 2) drug possession, 3) carrying a gun, and 4) assault and battery. After speaking to a female victim, Officer Jones noticed an individual who partially fit the description, and walked toward them. Officer Jones identified himself, and told the individual to stop. Unfortunately, this individual did not stop, and kept on walking from the officer, and the officer shouted again identifying himself, but this time the individual stopped. When the individual stopped he looked at the officer and there was a big bulge in his right pocket, but refused to put his hands where the cop could see them. The subject began...

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Civil Action Reflection

...A Civil Action Trial Procedure In the movie, A Civil Action, a civil lawsuit takes place between families of the victims of a small town Woburn, Massachusetts against the corporations Beatrice Foods, and W.R. Grace Company. The corporations are being sued by the families for indirectly killing their children by contaminating the water that runs through their town. The attorney that files a lawsuit against the big corporations is Jan Schlichtmann. This movie portrays a great example of a civil trial procedure in the U.S. Court. The first stage of a civil trial procedure are the pleadings, which include the filing of complain, and motions to dismiss. A complaint was made by the families of Woburn, stating that the deaths of their children were the cause of the contamination of their town’s water supply. The complaints were made for the corporations Beatrice Foods, and W.R. Grace Company. Mr. Cheeseman, the attorney on behalf of Grace Company made a motion to dismiss the case but the judge ruled otherwise. The second stage is the pretrial, where discovery of facts and motions for summary judgment take place. In A Civil Action, the discoveries began with depositions of witnesses by the victim’s family members, residents of Woburn, and employees that work for the factories that are being blamed for contaminating the water. Witnesses came up stating that they were experiencing events of abnormal health issues and that it could be correlated with contamination of the water. One...

Words: 459 - Pages: 2


...Kafi Hunter Torts Assignment Module 6 As a result of the crash, Farmer suffered several thousand dollars in damage to his land. Neither Dan nor Pilot suffered any physical injuries. 1. Does Farmer have any claim(s) for damages against Pilot based on intentional tort? Discuss. Intentional tort is a deliberate action to cause harm. The Pilot could not see if the land that she choose to navigate the plane for a safe landing had any crops therefore her intent was not deliberate to destroy the crops. However, the Pilot did trespass on the Farmers land. Trespass is considered an intentional tort and occurs when the violation of an exclusive possession is interfered upon. A trespass violation also gives the owner of the property the right to bring a civil lawsuit and collect damages as compensation for any harm suffered. The Pilot did not have permission to land on the Farmers land when landing the plane. The Pilot also destroyed crops with landing the plane. The Farmer does have a claim against the Pilot based on the intentional tort of trespass. 2. Does Dan have any claim(s) against Pilot for intentional tort? Discuss. Dan could claim battery against the Pilot because she intended to move him out of the way. Battery is an intentional tort and a crime because it is a harmful or offensive contact towards another person. Pilot asked Dan to move out of the way of the exit so that Pilot could leave the plane. Dan choose to remain seated until the Fire Department......

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Civil Action

...A Civil Action We live on the blue planet; a planet that is named after the abundant presence of water on its surface. So yes there is a lot of water but how much of that water is actually useful to us? Most of the water on Earth is deposited in seas and oceans i.e. it is salty. The human species cannot digest saltwater hence the only water that is useful to us is in the handful of lakes, ponds and under the ground surface. Thus our illusion of there being enough water for us to live on for generations needs to be break. After watching the Civil Action, I realized how much the people around me and I take water for granted. Because it is available to us readily, we do not even think twice about our usage patterns. But we need to realize that the situation depicted in the Civil Action is real and much more common than we think it is. There are people in this world who do not have access to clean drinking water and there are also people who are being lied to about the cleanliness of their drinking water. Water is a basic necessity of life because we need it to survive; in simple words, it is our basic human right. But as seen in the Civil Action, there are many people in this world who are being deprived of their basic right. In the current world, companies like those depicted in the movie are chasing after monetary things like profit and in the process are neglecting safety and health. But is money more important than health? I don’t think so. The Civil Action was a......

Words: 637 - Pages: 3

Civil Action

...The movie Civil Action is about personal injury lawyer named Jan Schlichtman who sues two major companies, Beatrice foods, and Grace Industries. Jan becomes too emotionally attached to the case. At first he is all about the money then it becomes more than that to him and he gets to involved in finding the truth, and his judgment becomes slighted. Throughout the movie and the case; civil trail procedure is shown from jury selection to the verdict. In the movie Jan starts out as a rich millionaire personal injury lawyer who is also one ofBoston’s top 10 bachelors. Then an orphan case one day had landed on his desk, and this case was filed by the town ofWoobergfor the wrongful death of eight children. Jan said no to the town at first and told them that there was no money involved for him so he would not do it, but he then got curious and did some research and found that 2 major companies were involved in this case. The companies Beatrice Foods and Grace Industries. So then Jan decides that now he has the opportunity to make a lot of money so he tells the town he has reconsidered and will do the case. Once the complaint is filed and the two companies are summoned to the pre trail court, the two lawyers for the companies are Mr. Cheeseman for Grace and Mr. Facher for Beatrice. Grace Industry’s lawyer Mr. Cheeseman tried to overturn the case by using Rule 11. Rule 11 is a very old and ridiculous rule that has not been used in decades so then his appeal is overturned. After the......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Civil Action

...Civil Action Assignment 3 1. An expert witness is a witness who has knowledge beyond that of the ordinary lay person enabling him/her to give testimony regarding an issue that requires expertise to understand. Experts are allowed to give opinion testimony which a non-expert witness may be prohibited from testifying to. 2. Both sides had to bring in experts in regards to the chemicals that the wells were contaminated with. Then they had to bring in experts in ground water movement, they had to prove chemicals were dumped, and had to prove the chemicals made the people sick. Proving of causation was the reason why so many experts were called on. Every aspect of the evidence had to be proven to be as solid as possible to be allowed in court. 3. Hydrogeologist, Geologist, Engineering Geologist, Soil scientists, Geochemist 4. The first issue is money. Experts are paid for their time and even though it creates a substantial incentive for the expert to advocate a party's position that is not supported by available research and data. This problem is particularly acute with the professional witness, who makes her living testifying as an expert. A professional witness is highly motivated out of self interest to develop relationships with lawyers because those relationships are the expert's lifeblood. The more effective the expert is in advancing the lawyer's case, the greater the likelihood the expert will be retained again. The Safeguards of the Adversary......

Words: 577 - Pages: 3