Was Permissive Legislation in Britain in the 1960s and 1970s a Response to Social Change or Did It Create It?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By alexander1992
Words 3580
Pages 15
Was permissive legislation in Britain in the 1960s and 1970s a response to social change or did it create it?
In 1959, six years before becoming Labour’s Home Secretary, Roy Jenkins said that ‘the state should not impinge excessively on peoples private lives and personal morality’. Permissiveness is routed in this idea of a new relationship between society and the individual, representing ‘striking changes in public and private morals’. According to Andrews, social change began in 1956 with a ‘class initiative’, caused by rapidly growing affluence. The affluence of the 1950s is proven by the proportion of homeowners in England and Wales rising from 31% to 44% between 1951-60, representing vast economic growth. Many politicians, particularly those on the Left, believed that ‘the affluent society was directly responsible for the permissive society’. Rising affluence occurred amid the re-emergence of Conservative values in the post-World War Two period, with Brown claiming that ‘the 1950s were about perfecting Victorian values’. The conservatism of the 1950s gave the 1960s a cause for rebellion, creating the unique conditions for permissive legislation to be passed. This paper will focus on acts passed between 1967-1970, including the Abortion, NHS (Family Planning) and the Sexual Offences Acts of 1967, the Divorce Reform Acts (1969), and in 1970 the Matrimonial Property Act. These permissive acts symbolised the breakdown of Victorian and Christian morals, particularly surrounding the family, thus causing social change.
Politicians from the era debated how far social change was caused by legislation, with Left-wing politicians questioning how permissive the legislation really was. Marwick claims that ‘it is a mistake to concentrate on politics and changes of government’ as social movements ‘continued largely irrespective of the political complexions of government’.…...

Similar Documents

Social Change

...movements and progress that has been made throughout the years, it has let people better understand evils of race and how it is not something that should be of importance when deciding on where an individual stands in the world. People have always misconstrued an individual’s particular race with that as something that describes that person as a whole. Because of an individual’s race, this was something that was said to predict where people would fall in the community and this would lay out what chances an individual had in the working world in comparison to someone else. In reading William Julius Wilson’s thoughts on the idea of race and how it has been a major if not the most crucial reasoning to where a person stands in the world, I have been informed of what dilemmas there are that have and still occur today. I have been informed of the idea that race is unfortunately what people depict when they create an outcome for a particular individual. During the 20th century, it was now a period of time where it was no longer race that was as central of an issue, but it was now class position that was said to have the most importance of where people stood, Black individuals to be specific. When viewing the issues that lie within cities involving poverty, it has been said to focus rather on universal conclusions as a whole and not solutions directed mainly towards an individual’s race. It is important for us to realize that race should not be key but, what is critical is that we......

Words: 1483 - Pages: 6

Economic and Social Change in the Late 20th Century

...Chapter 30: Economic and Social Change in the Late 20th Century Economic, cultural, and social changes have affected America greatly in the late twentieth century. The population since 1980 has become increasingly older, urban, diverse, southern, and western. Declining birth rates and rising life expectancy combined to produce an aging population. Between 1970 and 1990 most American financial and industrial growth occurred in the South and West, the Sunbelt. The Sunbelt also proved attractive to large numbers of new immigrants from Latin America and Asia. Lyndon Johnson's 1965 Immigration Act laid the basis for an increased volume and diversity of immigrants. Modern legislation has attempted to limit immigration to political refugees, and also to curb illegal immigration, while raising the number of immigrants with specific skills. Continued flight of businesses and individuals to the suburbs brought transformation and crisis in the nation's urban areas, but the 1990s witnessed a revival and renewal in some major cities. Technological change has ushered in amazing economic transformations. The most noteworthy new technologies are those in biotechnology, high-performance computing, and communications systems. Innovations in credit, electronic banking, franchising, and globalization, especially through the widespread use of computers, have affected business. Employment in traditional manufacturing areas declined while unions saw their membership and political......

Words: 1011 - Pages: 5

To What Extent Did the Second World War Bring About a Social Revolution in Britain ?

...extent did the Second World War bring about a social revolution in Britain? The impact of war was felt right across British society. One aspect was social mobility, the way the war took people out of their local communities and scattered them far wide across Britain and across the world. The war caused a massive emphasis on the idea that “we were all in this together”, that the Second World War was a “people’s war” with a universal acceptance of the impotence of civilians fighting on the home front. This involved universal acceptance of controls and sacrifices, such as rationing. World War Two encouraged and was a catalyst for social revolution in Britain after 1945. The war confronted Britain with many new social challenges and situations that had never been encountered before. However, it is debatable to what extent the social reform lasted and how strong its impact remains today. It is extremely clear that a social reform took place in Britain post World War Two for reasons including shared experiences and conscription. Military conscription was introduced in September 1940, with all men aged 18-40 liable to be called up, although there were exemptions for those needed in vital war work and for conscientious objectors. The impacts of certain factors did vary in strength and over time. It is evident that some factors still remain such as women in work but other factors such as propaganda were weak and therefore did not endure. It can be argued that the war did bring......

Words: 616 - Pages: 3

European Crisis in the 1970s and 1980s

...Crisis in the 1970s and 1980s During the 1950s and 1960s, Europe experienced a period of prosperity. Harold Macmillan gives a sense of just how well these times really were when he says, “Let us be frank about it: most of our people have never had it so good,” (Judt, 324). As political parties moved more towards a common center, rather than towards extremism, a rebirth of democracy was created, underlined by growth and full employment. The support for social democratic ideas flourished along with the prosperity of the 1950s and the 1960s in Western Europe. This time was characterized by conservative individualism and economic growth through regulated capitalism (Mazower, 327). With the help of the Marshall Plan, a global market was encouraged among the European Community. Europe began to prosper, as economics were structured more towards a consumer society. To provide for this new consumer society, unemployment rates in the 1950s and 1960s naturally were low, at about 4-5% (Dr. Shearer - lecture), and therefore created an increase in the productivity of the European worker. When compared to the previous eighty years, labor productivity in Western Europe rose by three times between 1950 and 1980 (Judt, 326). However, as this prosperity continued, problems eventually began to arise. The prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s gradually evolved into a crisis of “post modernity” (Mazower, 328). A gradual increase in the prices over time during the 1950s and 1960s introduced a......

Words: 2155 - Pages: 9

Assess the View That Religion Was Once Mainly a Conservative Influence but Today Is More a Force for Social Change (30 Marks)

...Assess the view that religion was once mainly a conservative influence but today is more a force for social change (30 marks) In the past religions role as a conservative force was portrayed by the monarchy, ruling the divine rights in medieval Europe, and the Egyptian pharaohs were considered as almost God-like figures and so no one questioned their authority. Feminists and Marxists both agree that religion is a conditioning device that oppresses people, diluting the demand for social change to protect the interests of the men and the ruling class. This is partially supported by the Functionalist approach, Durkheim expressed the belief that religion provides social cement, reinforcing traditional beliefs chosen by religious moral code; such as the 10 commandments for Christianity, for the good of society. However there are numerous examples of ways where religion has acted as a force of change, such as the war in Palestine, the wars in former Yugoslavia and in a positive way, the actions of religious leaders, such as Ghandi and Martin Luther King. In today’s society religion has acted as both a conservative force and a force of social change, as shown by ‘Islamic Fundamentalists’ in Iran and Afghanistan, and Christian fundamentalism reintroducing the teachings of creationism in the US. Religion is also seen to be a conservative force because it functions to preserve things as they are, it stabilises society and maintains status quo. Most religions have conservative......

Words: 987 - Pages: 4


...1970s From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search "Seventies" redirects here. For decades comprising years 70–79 of other centuries, see List of decades. From left, clockwise: U.S. President Richard Nixon doing the V for Victory sign after his resignation from office after the Watergate scandal in 1974; Refugees aboard a US naval boat after the Fall of Saigon, leading to the end of the Vietnam War in 1975; The 1973 oil crisis put the nation of America in gridlock and caused economic damage throughout the developed world; Both the leaders of Israel and Egypt shake hands after the signing of the Camp David Accords in 1978; The 1970 Bhola cyclone kills an estimated 500,000 people in the densely populated Ganges Delta region of East Pakistan (which would become independent as Bangladesh in 1971) in November 1970; The Iranian Revolution of 1979 ousted Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi who was later replaced by an Islamic theocracy led by Ayatollah Khomeini; The popularity of the disco music genre peaked during the middle to late 1970s. Millennium: | 2nd millennium | Centuries: | 19th century – 20th century – 21st century | Decades: | 1940s 1950s 1960s – 1970s – 1980s 1990s 2000s | Years: | 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 | Categories: | Births – Deaths – ArchitectureEstablishments – Disestablishments | The 1970s, pronounced "the Nineteen Seventies", refers to a decade within the Gregorian calendar that began on January 1, 1970,......

Words: 11872 - Pages: 48

When Did Britain Become a Democracy?

...When Did Britain Become A Democracy? A democracy is a system of government where the majority of the population has the right to vote for government representatives from several political parties. There was a situation in the 1820s that caused problems to the people in Britain some of them were: no women were allowed to vote, nobody who voted could keep their vote a secret and that only men had the right to become MPs. These are just a few but you can imagine how many more there are. From Sir Philip Francis we can tell that barely any people voted because he said that “I was elected by one voter to represent this borough in parliament. There was no other candidate or opposition.” I think that this should not have happened in 1820 because they were being sexist. For me I find this a terrible thing like racism. The 1832 Reform Act (a.k.a Great Reform Act). This reform act was an act of parliament. Most argue that it did not lead to lots if quick changes it got people more convinced that they have the right to vote as well not just men who were rich. After this there were two more reform acts. Chartism was a working-class movement for political reform in Britain between 1838 and 1848 which took its name from the People's Charter of 1838. The Chartists made ‘The Peoples Charter’ it consisted of six basic reforms which were: Every man over 21 who is not a criminal or insane should be allowed to vote, voting should be done in secret, candidates should not need to be rich or......

Words: 945 - Pages: 4

How Far Do Sources 1 and 2 Challenge the View That the Boer War Was Responsible for Social Change in Britain?

...parliament justifying the involvement of the British Empire in the Boer war, October 1899. It suggests that the main reasons for the involvement of the British Empire in the Boer war was to protect British subjects – people like Bates, Milner and Rhodes who had invested in mines and were subject to harsh treatment – and to protect the Empire, giving his speech a more old imperialistic view. Also, the quote “in the last resort” suggests that the Boers have already had chances, but Britain gave them their last chance. Source 2 was an extract from Lloyd-George, a responding speech to Chamberlain’s. Source 2 suggests that the involvement of Britain in the Boer war was more to do with capitalism and profit instead of the defence of the Empire. “forces to defend our possessions”, this quote slightly agrees with source 3, as it shows we did have to defend ourselves in Boer territory. However, source 2 doesn’t agree with source 3 in other aspects, as Lloyd-George says that we are involved mainly for capitalism and profit, “the war has no connection with the civil rights of British subjects”. So source 2 does agree slightly with source 3 , on the basis that Britain did have to defend themselves, but Chamberlain wanted to defend the possessions (gold mines etc) to promote economic growth of the Empire. Also, source 3 was a speech in parliament. If Chamberlain went out right and said that ‘I want to get involved in the Boer war because I want to secure the gold mines and make us......

Words: 617 - Pages: 3

Was Great Britain Really That Great

...The industrial revolution began in the 1700 till the late 1800’s it was an era that began in Britain and slowly spread across the globe. It was a transition to new manufacturing processes which changed Britain from a land of small towns, villages and farms to large towns and factories. The industrial revolution marked a turning point in Britain’s history. Every aspect of daily life was affected in some way. The standard of living increased greatly as did the life expectancy of humans. It was a time where new technologies were invented. During the industrial revolution new medical inventions helped increase the standards of healthcare and with the invention of the vaccination many diseases were prevented. Before the industrial revolution the only means of transport were horses and they provided the only motive transport on land and sails for the sea. The industrial revolution brought railways and canals to Britain. People could move from one place to another faster and in a cheaper price. Due to these new inventions raw materials were transported quicker and easily to factories which helped in the growth of the industry. Population increased rapidly during the industrial revolution due to the improved living conditions. The increase was due to the better health care, as a result less infant mortality. The increase in Britain’s population allowed more people to work which lead to Britain becoming richer and richer and eventually the most powerful country in the world...

Words: 509 - Pages: 3

Social Movements in the 1970s

...Women in the 1960s Regina Wilson HIS/145 07/29/2015 Women's liberation movement became prominent in the 1960s. Women's liberation was the fight for the equality of women and men. In the previous years, men were always dominant over women in every sense of the word. They held the jobs; they made all of the financial decisions, as well any other decisions about the household, as far as sexual relationships, men decided when, where and how. When courageous women were bold enough to speak out about being the inferior gender, and developing organizations that addressed the issue, as well as writing books about it, the idea of women finally having more freedom was appealing and became popular very quick. Organizations were formed promoting Women's liberation, and some are still in existence today. National Organization for Women, commonly known as NOW, was founded in 1966 and is still in existence today. This organization's motto was "to take action, to achieve equality of women." One of the co-founders of the organization was a lady named Betty Friedan. Ms. Friedan was the author of a book called The Feminine Mystique (A.W. 1976). Ms. Friedan was a woman that was not afraid to voice her opinion on anything for jobs to sex, and these are things that women had wanted to do for years, but just did not know how. Because of her brazen and bold conversations, she instantly became famous, and when......

Words: 818 - Pages: 4

How Far Was Cultural Change in Britain in the 1960’s Due to the Contraceptive Pill

...How far was cultural change in Britain in the 1960’s due to the contraceptive pill (24 marks) During the sixties Britain experienced a huge amount of cultural change, some may say that this was due to the contraceptive pill and it’s liberalising affect on women. On the other hand it could have been due to the rise in affluence, technological advances or the development of the car. The pill was licensed for use in Britain in 1961 and could be prescribed on the National Health Service. As source B states ‘women were keen to try it’. It led to cultural change firstly as it was liberalising to women. Source A states that women felt ‘in control’ and ‘free’. This was because the pill allowed women to plan when they wanted children, which in turn gave them a chance to get careers, something that wasn’t common for women during this time. It meant that women weren’t confined to being housewives as they could choose when and if they wanted to have a baby. As source A states ‘it changed women’s lives’. Further to this it led to a more permissive society. Women could have sex without the worry of getting pregnant, especially important as abortion hadn’t been legalised at this time. Source a states that she ‘had an affair’’ because she ‘could get away with it’. The family planning act in 1967 added to this when it allowed the pill to be prescribed to single women, not just married. This shows that there was a change in moral standards. For example the media was now publicising......

Words: 746 - Pages: 3

The Labour Government (1964 to 1970) Was Strong on Rhetoric, but Not on Action.” to What Extent Do You Agree with This Statement? (45)

...Harold Wilson, who was the Prime Minister during 1964-70, had promised Britain one of his most effective campaign speeches. He had promised that Britain would catch up with “the white heat” of technological change. Wilson had successfully linked the Labour Party to modernisation in contrast to what were described as the “wasted years” of the Conservative government. The Labour government seemed to be more in touch with the social and cultural trends of the 1960s. Modernisation of the British economy was one of the key priorities for the Labour government. By 1964, it was widely accepted that Britain was lagging behind other countries such as West Germany and Japan. Britain’s economy seemed to be trapped in the cycle of “stop-go”, with bursts of prosperity always leading to inflation, runs on the pound snd regular crises over the balance of payments. Reorganising the economy to break out of this cycle was the key aim of Wilson’s government in 1964. Moreover, Labour inherited a deficit of about £800million. The two classic economic solutions to this kind of problem were deflation and devaluation. But Wilson and his Chancellor of Exchequer, James Callaghan, refused to do neither. Instead, Wilson was convinced that these problems could be fixed by careful management and planning. A new department, the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) was set up, led by George Brown and a National Plan had been drawn up. He had set growth targets and devised a national system of “economic......

Words: 1323 - Pages: 6

Canada in the 1970s

...During the 1970s, there were social, political, and economic events and issues that challenged Canadians. Throughout the 70s, some of the social issues were racism, gender discrimination, and language rights. A few of the political issues were immigration, refugees seeking asylum in Canada, and the challenge of humanitarianism of Canadians. Economically, Canada faced the most problems here; “oil price shock”, “supply shocks”, stagflation, and inflation. Throughout the 1970s, Canadians were changing Canada’s society to become more equal in the context of racism, gender discrimination, and language rights. Pierre Elliott Trudeau was trying to build Canadian society to a “just” society where it is multicultural and everyone would live in harmony. Throughout the 1970s federal government implanted new social programs and expanded the old ones. In the 1960s women's rights activists demanded the establishment of the Royal Commission on the status of women. In December of 1970 that document included new recommendations such as; providing daycare services for working women, prohibiting gender discrimination bias or marital status, unemployment benefits to working women on maternity leave, and wages established based on skills and responsibility rather than gender. The Women's movement was a defining moment for Canada’s society in the 1970s. Canadian women all agreed on the basic need to improve the situation of women; to fight racism and sexism. Women demanded affirmative action......

Words: 1112 - Pages: 5

Social Change in Britain 1625-1688

...How far do you agree that population growth was the most important factor in causing social change between 1625 and 1688? * Population growth * Colonisation- North America colonies and also The Caribbean * The growth of London and its impact on economic development Throughout the 17th century Britain underwent substantial social change beginning most prominently under the Stuart monarchs Charles the 1st and 2nd. Many things changed drastically in and around this period which lead to drastic social change for example firstly there was a big spurt in population going from around 2 million inhabitants in Britain in the 15th century to around 5 million in the 16th, Britain’s great colonisation successes in the North Americas and the Caribbean building its economy and strength as a world power competitively and finally the growth of London and the impact it had on the rest of the country and Europe as it emerged as the no1 trading centre in the whole of Europe eventually which bettered the lives of many. I believe that population growth was by far the most significant factor in causing social change between 1625-1688; this is mainly because this was in a way a catalyst for change as the economy and infrastructure had to cope with the ever-growing and demanding population of Britain. For example the development of the national markets in the country only came about after the much smaller and local markets which existed where becoming too small, so this here lead to...

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

To What Extent Was the Impact of Social Reformers the Most Important Change for the People of Wales and England 1880 – 1929?

...To what extent was the impact of social reformers the most important change for the people of Wales and England 1880 – 1929? In the 1880s Britain was led by the Liberal leader Gladstone. He believed in laissez-faire meaning that people helped themselves rather than relying on the government for help. The poor were seen as either undeserving or deserving and upper class men were the only people who had the vote. There were only two political parties to vote for – the Conservatives and the Liberals, neither of which offered any help to the poor as they felt that they didn’t deserve help as it was their own fault for getting into poverty. The first time that the government got involved in people’s lives was in 1906 with the Liberal Reforms, and was a direct result of the social reformers. In the 1880s, the settlement movement started where middle class citizens would go to areas of poverty to provide childcare and education, in order to try and improve the lives of the poor. The Social Reformers, Booth and Rowntree, published their findings and made an effect felt by many people in different ways. They conducted studies in London and York on poverty and published their findings and coined the term ‘poverty line’. They found that 30% of people lived in poverty and that it was a direct cause of poor health. They found that the primary causes of poverty were low wages, illness and age. No matter how hard someone worked, they could not lift themselves above the poverty line....

Words: 1214 - Pages: 5